Isolating the impact of COVID-19 lockdown measures on urban air quality in Canada

We have investigated the impact of reduced emissions due to COVID-19 lockdown measures in spring 2020 on air quality in Canada’s four largest cities: Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver, and Calgary. Observed daily concentrations of NO2, PM2.5, and O3 during a “pre-lockdown” period (15 February–14 March 2020) and a “lockdown” period (22 March–2 May 2020), when lockdown measures were in full force everywhere in Canada, were compared to the same periods in the previous decade (2010–2019). Higher-than-usual seasonal declines in mean daily NO2 were observed for the pre-lockdown to lockdown periods in 2020. For PM2.5, Montreal was the only city with a higher-than-usual seasonal decline, whereas for O3 all four cities remained within the previous decadal range. In order to isolate the impact of lockdown-related emission changes from other factors such as seasonal changes in meteorology and emissions and meteorological variability, two emission scenarios were performed with the GEM-MACH air quality model. The first was a Business-As-Usual (BAU) scenario with baseline emissions and the second was a more realistic simulation with estimated COVID-19 lockdown emissions. NO2 surface concentrations for the COVID-19 emission scenario decreased by 31 to 34% on average relative to the BAU scenario in the four metropolitan areas. Lower decreases ranging from 6 to 17% were predicted for PM2.5. O3 surface concentrations, on the other hand, showed increases up to a maximum of 21% close to city centers versus slight decreases over the suburbs, but Ox (odd oxygen), like NO2 and PM2.5, decreased as expected over these cities.

Mini ozone holes due to dust release of iodine

<p>Desert dust as a source of iron and other micronutrients is recognized to fertilize oceans, but little attention has been paid to dust as a source of iodine. Empirical observations find iodate on dust measured during ship cruises downwind of the Sahara desert. However, it remains unclear whether iodine in dust is the result of marine iodine uptake on dust during transport in the marine boundary layer, or whether such iodine accumulates over geological time scales, and is emitted together with dust. Significant enhancements of iodine have been observed in Sahara dust events in form of methyl iodide (CH<sub>3</sub>I) and iodine monoxide (IO) radicals, but atmospheric models currently do not consider dust as a source of iodine. Furthermore, dust plumes are often accompanied by significant ozone loss, which is commonly attributed to reactive uptake of O<sub>3</sub> and other odd oxygen species (i.e., N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>, HNO<sub>3</sub>) on dust surfaces. However, laboratory experiments struggle to reproduce the large reactive uptake coefficients needed to explain field observations, and do not consider iodine chemistry. We present evidence that dust induced "mini ozone holes" in the remote (Southern Hemisphere) lower free troposphere west of South America (TORERO field campaign) are largely the result of gas-phase iodine chemistry in otherwise unpolluted (low NO<sub>x</sub>) dust layers that originate from the Atacama and Sechura Deserts. Ozone concentrations inside these elevated dust layers are often 10-20 ppb, and as low as 3 ppb, and influence entrainment of low ozone air from aloft into the marine boundary layer. Ozone depletion is found to be widespread, extending up to 6km altitude, and thousands of kilometers along the coast. Elevated IO radical concentrations inside decoupled dust layers are higher than in the marine boundary layer, and serve as a source of iodine, and vigorous ozone sink following entrainment to the marine boundary layer. The implications for our perception of iodine sources, surface air quality, oxidative capacity, and climate are briefly discussed.</p>