P-BN22 The use of virtual clinics in gallbladder polyp surveillance

Background Gallbladder polyps are common findings on ultrasound with a prevalence between 0.3-9.5%. Their significance is not clear but are theorised to have potential risk of transformation into gallbladder malignancy which have poor prognosis if not caught early. Current guidelines recommend surveillance of polyps and that laparoscopic cholecystectomy should be offered if certain criteria are met. Most patients are asymptomatic and regular reviews in clinic is time consuming for patients and adds to strain on services. This study looks at the use of virtual clinics in gallbladder polyp surveillance. Methods Since January 2019 patients identified with gallbladder polyps have been added to virtual clinic. Each patient is added to a database which is maintained by one upper GI surgeon. Current guidelines are followed: laparoscopic cholecystectomy is offered if polyps are greater than 1cm, there is an increase greater than 2mm between scans, and in high-risk groups or in symptomatic patients. All other patients are offered interval scans as per guidelines and a template letter is generated informing patients of their scan results and date of their follow up scan. Results Since January 2019, 70 patients have been identified to have gallbladder polyps. Of these 48 patients so far have benefitted from involvement from follow up in virtual clinic to date, this has resulted in 88 clinic appointments being saved. 12 patients have undergone laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to increase in size of their gallbladder polyps or secondary to symptoms. 7 patients have been lost to follow up, 2 discharged due to the gallbladder polyps disappearing and the other 49 remain under surveillance in the virtual clinic. Conclusions Long term polyp surveillance can be time consuming for both the patient and clinician. This model of a virtual clinic maintains clear communication with patients about their scan findings, the risks associated and plans for future scans. This is an efficient method of monitoring these patients that has good compliance and identifies patients appropriate for surgery.

SP6.1.10 Can gallbladder polyp surveillance be justified? Experience of a large DGH

Aims Gallbladder polyps are typically an incidental finding on sonographic or pathological examination with an estimated prevalence of 0.3 – 9.5%. Their role as a precursor to gallbladder malignancy is disputed. The 2017 European Joint Society Guidelines (ESGAR/EAES/EFISDS/ESGE) aim to standardise management of gallbladder polyps detected prior to cholecystectomy. We aim to describe our experience in the management of gallbladder polyps in a district general hospital. Methods This single centre retrospective case series included consecutive cholecystectomies over an 8-year period, identified through pathology records. Medical records were interrogated to identify the presence of gallbladder polyps identified pre-operatively and at subsequent histopathological analysis. Results 3835 cases were included. Four cases (0.1%) had an adenocarcinoma identified; none of these had pre-operatively identified polyps. Two cases (0.05%) were found to have lesions with high-grade dysplasia, 1 of which had a 17mm polyp preoperatively. One case (0.03%) had cellular atypia, without a pre-operative polyp. Forty six cases (1.2%) were found to have low-grade dysplasia; 1 (2.2%) of these had adenomyomatosis pre-operatively but none had pre-operative polyps. Overall, 53 patients (1.4%) had abnormal pathology with only 1 (1.9%) of these having a pre-operative polyp identified. Conclusions Our results suggest that in the real-world setting, intensive surveillance of gallbladder polyps has limited utility in identifying cases of gallbladder malignancy. The burden on services produced by adherence to strict surveillance guidelines is difficult to justify and a less arduous approach is unlikely to significantly influence the management or outcome in patients with gallbladder malignancy.

Meta-analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound for the diagnosis of gallbladder malignancy

Background The diagnosis between benign and malignant gallbladder lesions is sometimes difficult. The objective of this study is to assess whether contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CH-EUS) can be an accurate method for detecting gallbladder malignancy and to determine which imaging signs can be indicative of malignancy. Methods A study search of PubMed, Elsevier, and Sciencedirect was performed in May 2019. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve were used to examine the accuracy of CEUS and CH-EUS. Results Twenty-one studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivities of CEUS and CH-EUS were 0.81 (0.75–0.86) and 0.92 (0.86–0.95); the specificities were 0.94 (0.90–0.96) and 0.89 (0.69–0. 97); the DORs were 64 (32–127) and 89 (22–354); and the area under the SROC curves were 0.90 (0.87–0.92) and 0.92 (0.90–0.94). On CEUS, the diagnostic criterion for gallbladder malignancy according to four features were analyzed. Sensitivity and specificity were 0.75 (0.65–0.83) and 0.98 (0.85–1.00) for integrity of gallbladder wall; 0.69 (0.55–0.81) and 0.89 (0.77–0.95) for heterogeneous enhancement; 0.81 (0.71–0.88) and 0.88 (0.76–0.94) for irregular vessels; and 0.81 (0.66–0.91) and 0.75 (0.59–0.86) for washout time within 28 s. On CH-EUS, heterogeneous enhancement could be indicative of malignant lesions with a sensitivity of 0.94 (0.85–0.97); and the specificity was 0.92 (0.71–0.98). Conclusions CEUS and CH-EUS are promising and reliable imaging modalities with a high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of gallbladder malignancy. CH-EUS might be more sensitive than CEUS with a higher sensitivity. In addition, irregular tralesional vessels and washout time within 28 s on CEUS and heterogeneous enhancement on CH-EUS are indicative of malignancy. However, larger scale and well-designed studies are warranted to verify our results.

Management of gallbladder polyps

Summary A gallbladder polyp (GP) is defined as an elevation of the gallbladder mucosa that protrudes into the gallbladder lumen. Gallbladder polyps (GPs) have an estimated prevalence in adults of 0.3–12.3%. However, only 5% of polyps are considered “true” GPs that have malignant potential or are even already cancerous. The most important imaging method for diagnosis and follow-up of GPs is transabdominal ultrasound, but it fails to discriminate between true and pseudo polyps at a clinically relevant level. Although gallbladder cancer (GBC) arising from polyps is a rare event, malignancy is significantly more common among polyps from a size of 10 mm. In light of this, the consensus, which is reflected in current guidelines, is that surgery should be considered for polyps of 10 mm or greater. However, 10 mm is an arbitrary cutoff, and high-quality evidence to support this is lacking. Lowering the threshold for cholecystectomy when patients have additional risk factors for gallbladder malignancy may improve the cancer detection rate in polyps smaller than 10 mm. Nevertheless, the evidence behind this is also weak. This review shows the shortcomings in the available evidence and underlines the decision-making process regarding the surgical indication, surveillance, or both.

Haemocholecyst related to gallbladder malignancy

A haemocholecyst is a clot-filled gallbladder caused by bleeding into its lumen. It is a rare entity with fewer than 50 cases reported in the English literature. Preoperative diagnosis is often not possible even with good quality cross-sectional imaging. Here, we present a case of a gallbladder mass, whose nature was only made clear at operation, where a hugely enlarged gallbladder was found filled with blood clots. There was neither liver infiltration nor regional lymphadenopathy. The clinical status of the patient demanded simple cholecystectomy. Histopathological examination, however, revealed a gallbladder adenocarcinoma, infiltrating the perimuscular connective tissue. Thus, more radical surgery was performed eight weeks later. At the 21-month follow-up, the patient was found to be well.