A Poor Research Landscape Hinders the Progression of Knowledge and Treatment of Reproductive Diseases

Reproductive diseases have gone under the radar for many years, resulting in insufficient diagnostics and treatments. Infertility rates are rising, preeclampsia claims over 70 000 maternal and 500 000 neonatal lives globally per year, and endometriosis affects 10% of all reproductive-aged women but is often undiagnosed for many years. Policy changes have been enacted to mitigate the gender inequality in research investigators and subjects of medical research. However, the disparities in reproductive research advancement still exist. Here, we analyzed the reproductive science research landscape to quantify the gravity of the current situation. We find that non-reproductive organs are researched 5-20 times more annually than reproductive organs, leading to an exponentially increasing relative knowledge gap in reproductive sciences. Additionally, reproductive organs (breast and prostate) are mainly researched when there is a disease focus, leading to a lack of basic understanding of the reproductive organs. This gap in knowledge affects reproductive syndromes and other bodily systems and research areas, such as cancer biology and regenerative medicine. Current researchers, funding organizations and educators must take action to combat this longstanding disregard of reproductive science.

Embryologist's Job in Assisted Reproductive Technologies and in Vitro Fertilization

What exactly does an embryologist do? is one of the most common question asked by patients and the possible answer could be that embryologist is the child’s first watchperson. The ability to grow embryos in laboratory environment was a huge scientific achievement. Scientists and Embryologists are involved in reproductive research and fertility treatment. The embryologist has a huge role to play in IVF/ICSI process and the contribution of embryologist is no less than infertility consultant. They might not be doctors, but they are highly trained medical professionals, holding a master’s degree or Ph.D. due to specialized nature of work. They are responsible for management and maintenance of laboratory used in creating embryos as well as monitoring those embryos. The important activities that embryologist does are maintaining the embryology lab (temperature, humidity, CO2 cylinder, diffusion gas and pH), oocyte screening during ovum pickup (OPU), incubation and checking of fertilization, embryo transfer, vitrification and embryo biopsy for pre-implantation genetic screening (PGS) or pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD).

The ontology of early labour (and the difficulties of talking about it): Using interview methods to investigate uncertain and gendered concepts

This article presents reflections on the process of collecting interview data about fathers’ experiences of ‘early labour’. Early labour is the first phase of labour, defined in textbooks by regular contractions and cervical dilation of up to 4 cm. Women are typically encouraged to stay at home during early labour and only travel to hospital when they are in ‘active labour’. Maternity services (and other providers of antenatal education) devote a great deal of attention to educating parents-to-be about the phases of labour and about how to recognise the ‘right time’ to travel to hospital but ‘early’ admission remains a problem. Prompted by suggestions in the existing literature that male partners may influence when women seek admission, my research set out to explore fathers’ understanding and experiences of early labour. However, interviewing fathers about early labour was challenging and, in this article, I will argue that this was due to a particular configuration of practical, epistemological and ontological issues. I argue that early labour is a slippery and uncertain concept beyond the clinical context and that Mol’s ‘multiple ontologies’ provides productive tools for reflecting on the difficulty of asking about early labour, keeping early labour in focus during the interviews, and finding early labour in the data. However, the gendered nature of reproductive social research requires additional analysis to understand the gender dynamics at work when asking about reproductive research objects of multiple or uncertain ontologies.