Deriving VOS from VSO in Tongan

Research on word order has established several possible ways in which VOS order can be derived from VSO order. This chapter considers the derivational relationship between VSO and VOS in the Polynesian language Tongan. VSO order is basic in Tongan, and we address the derivation of VOS from this basic order in the context of multiple possibilities. We argue that Tongan VOS is better analyzed as rightward displacement of the subject as opposed to leftward displacement of the object proposed by Otsuka (2005a,c). The clause-final subject shows many of the hallmarks of rightward movement, including information-structural restrictions, locality with respect to the matrix clause, lack of clitic doubling, and connectivity with respect to case and binding. Given that rightward movement has an uneasy place in syntactic theory, we take pains to establish that the analysis is successful and worth further scrutiny.

Estimating Judicial Ideology

We review the substantial literature on estimating judicial ideology, from the US Supreme Court to the lowest state court. As a way to showcase the strengths and drawbacks of various measures, we further analyze trends in judicial polarization within the US federal courts. Our analysis shows substantial gaps in the ideology of judges appointed by Republican Presidents versus those appointed by Democrats. Similar to trends in Congressional polarization, the increasing gap is mostly driven by a rightward movement by judges appointed by Republicans. We conclude by noting important avenues for future research in the study of the ideology of judges.

The syntax of PP-adverbs within English determiner phrases

The current article explores the distribution of PP-adverbs, such as this month, this year etc., within English determiner phrases. Examples extracted from English newspapers show that PP-adverbs surprisingly separate head nouns from their PP-complements (i.e. of-phrases), e.g. the election this month of the first female president. At other times, PP-adverbs follow PP-complements, e.g. the election of the first female president this month. Assuming that these PP-adverbs have a null preposition (Larson 1985; McCawley 1988; Caponigro & Pearl 2008, 2009; Shun'ichiro 2013), I put forward three possible syntactic analyses to account for the examples above: (i) adjunction of both the PP-complement and the PP-adverb; (ii) leftward movement of the head noun or the noun phrase; and (iii) rightward movement of the PP-complement. Following Stowell (1981), Higginbotham (1983) and Anderson (1984), the adjunction proposal argues that both PP-adverbs and of-phrases are adjuncts, thus being freely ordered in the nominal hierarchy (Bresnan 1982; Svenonius 1994; Stroik & Putnam 2013). In contrast, the leftward movement analysis respects Kayne's (1994) Antisymmetric Theory of Linearization and argues that the of-phrase in the examples above is still a genuine complement, but the head noun, or sometimes the noun phrase, moves leftwards to a position higher than spec,FP where PP-adverbs are situated. As for the rightward movement account, it follows the leftward movement in treating the of-phrase as a complement but differs in that it extraposes the PP-complement outside PP-adverbs and right-adjoins it inside the DP. The article shows that the first two proposals are untenable, and sometimes cannot derive the wanted data. The third account is superior in that it accounts for the required data as well as other island-sensitive facts.

The Elite and Popular Roots of Contemporary Republican Extremism

The unremitting rightward movement of the Republican Party is currently driving asymmetric partisan polarization in the United States. After Democrats won major victories in 2006, 2008, and 2012, Republicans responded by pushing unpopular efforts to cut taxes on the rich, eviscerate labor protections, and slash spending on education, Social Security, and health care. Drawing from recent research, this chapter explains how two separate currents of right-wing extremism—billionaire ultra-free-market fundamentalism and popularly rooted ethno-nationalist resentment—have worked in tandem to remake the GOP. Although these elite and popular forces are often in tension, they have fused in a mutually leveraging way during the Donald Trump presidency.

C-16 Assessment of 9-Year-Old, Nonverbal Female with Spastic Cerebral Palsy & Seizure Disorder

Objective Case serves to illuminate how complex medical/neurological/motor history can be assessed creatively/thoroughly while maintaining standardization in an effort to determine true abilities of young girl. Earlier evaluation suggested NVIQ scores in the 30th percentile, however more recent school testing suggested performance in 2nd percentile. Method Nine-year-old, Caucasian, right-handed female with diagnoses of spastic CP, recent seizures with LOC, GERD, assessing functioning/academic needs. Pt born 40-weeks gestation via c-section due to fetal heartbeat loss resulting in emergency CPR/NICU admission for six weeks. MRI suggests significant hypoxia-related prenatal damage to right frontal/temporal regions. Nerve/muscle development results in leftward preference permitting rightward movement. Pt is nonverbal, implanted gastrostomy tube, utilizes modified sign-language/augmentative, alternative communication device (AACD). Current behavioral concerns in multiple settings. Pt prescribed esomeprazole, baclofen, oxcarbazepine. Results Results suggest deficits in adaptive functioning, set-shifting, language. Sustaining gaze was difficult, with subsequent invalid scores on numerous measures. Even with incorrect responses, Pt understood TEACh tasks. Given tools (calculator) at her disposal, Pt scored in 30th percentile on Math Computation. Further, TONI-4 nonverbal index was stronger than school expectations (10th percentile). PTONI negatively impacted by motor deficits. AACD offered limited vocabulary – Pt appeared well-aware of missing words when they arose (small vs. thin). Pt demonstrated high frustration-tolerance and ability to joke with examiners. Conclusions Conclusions: Pt’s performance and motivation were highly impressive given circumstances. Even with limiting factors, standardized measures can be utilized with critical qualitative observations to acquire more representative test results, provide adequate recommendations for ongoing care/accommodations, thereby advocating for academic success and improving Pt well-being.

“No One Wants to Change the System as Much as Those Who Are Trapped by the System”

This chapter analyzes media content, elite discourse, and public opinion on welfare reform in the mid-1990s. It demonstrates that major television and newspaper coverage of this historic neoliberal policy change significantly favored neoliberal views and downplayed elite and nongovernmental criticism. The chapter also demonstrates dwindling substance in news coverage of neoliberal policies since the early 1980s. Corporate imperatives in the increasingly consolidated media system and rightward movement in the Democratic Party during this historical period are connected to patterns in welfare news. Survey data suggest that media coverage shaped public opinion to support this paradigmatic neoliberal social policy.

The Bitter Fruits of Anticommunism

The legacy of the Cold War Liberalism, to which many intellectuals were drawn, comes in for a harsh critique in this chapter. Following a look at the post-1960s political transformations of Susan Sontag and David Horowitz, the rightward movement of Norman Podhoretz, Midge Decter, Irving Kristol, Hilton Kramer, and others are tracked, along with some observations about the last days of Philip Rahv. This includes discussion of publications such as New Criterion and Commentary.

Morphosyntax of Dravidian Languages

The Dravidian languages, spoken mainly in southern India and south Asia, were identified as a separate language family between 1816 and 1856. Four of the 26 Dravidian languages, namely Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, and Malayalam, have long literary traditions, the earliest dating back to the 1st century ce. Currently these four languages have among them over 200 million speakers in south Asia. The languages exhibit prototypical OV (object–verb) properties but relatively free word order, and are rich in nominal and verbal inflection; only Malayalam lacks verb agreement. A typical characteristic of Dravidian, which is also an areal characteristic of south Asian languages, is that experiencers and inalienable possessors are case-marked dative. Another is the serialization of verbs by the use of participles, and the use of light verbs to indicate aspectual meaning such as completion, self- or nonself-benefaction, and reflexivization. Subjects, and arguments in general (e.g., direct and indirect objects), may be nonovert. So is the copula, except in Malayalam. A number of properties of Dravidian are of interest from a universalist perspective, beginning with the observation that not all syntactic categories N, V, A, and P are primitive. Dravidian postpositions are nominal or verbal in origin. A mere 30 Proto-Dravidian roots have been identified as adjectival; the adjectival function is performed by inflected verbs (participles) and nouns. The nominal encoding of experiences (e.g., as fear rather than afraid/afeared) and the absence of the verb have arguably correlate with the appearance of dative case on experiencers. “Possessed” or genitive-marked N may fulfill the adjectival function, as noticed for languages like Ulwa (a less exotic parallel is the English of-possessive construction: circles of light, cloth of gold). More uniquely perhaps, Kannada instantiates dative-marked N as predicative adjectives. A recent argument that Malayalam verbs originate as dative-marked N suggests both that N is the only primitive syntactic category, and the seminal role of the dative case. Other important aspects of Dravidian morphosyntax to receive attention are anaphors and pronouns (not discussed here; see separate article, anaphora in Dravidian), in particular the long-distance anaphor taan and the verbal reflexive morpheme; question (wh-) words and the question/disjunction morphemes, which combine in a semantically transparent way to form quantifier words like someone; the use of reduplication for distributive quantification; and the occurrence of ‘monstrous agreement’ (first-person agreement in clauses embedded under a speech predicate, triggered by matrix third-person antecedents). Traditionally, agreement has been considered the finiteness marker in Dravidian. Modals, and a finite form of negation, also serve to mark finiteness. The nonfinite verbal complement to the finite negative may give the negative clause a tense interpretation. Dravidian thus attests matrix nonfinite verbs in finite clauses, challenging the equation of finiteness with tense. The Dravidian languages are considered wh-in situ languages. However, wh-words in Malayalam appear in a pre-verbal position in the unmarked word order. The apparently rightward movement of some wh-arguments could be explained by assuming a universal VO order, and wh-movement to a preverbal focus phrase. An alternative analysis is that the verb undergoes V-to-C movement.