scholarly journals High-flow nasal cannulae for respiratory support in adult intensive care patients

Author(s):  
Sharon R Lewis ◽  
Philip E Baker ◽  
Roses Parker ◽  
Andrew F Smith
Author(s):  
Amanda Corley ◽  
Claire M Rickard ◽  
Leanne M Aitken ◽  
Amy Johnston ◽  
Adrian Barnett ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Amanda Corley ◽  
Claire M Rickard ◽  
Leanne M Aitken ◽  
Amy Johnston ◽  
Adrian Barnett ◽  
...  

Neonatology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
pp. 300-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett J. Manley ◽  
Simone K. Dold ◽  
Peter G. Davis ◽  
Charles C. Roehr

ANALES RANM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 137 (137(02)) ◽  
pp. 154-160
Author(s):  
Ester Zamarrón ◽  
Carlos Carpio ◽  
Ana Santiago ◽  
Sergio Alcolea ◽  
Juan Carlos Figueira ◽  
...  

Objectives: to assess the impact of non-invasive respiratory therapies in critically ill patients diagnosed with COVID-19. Methods: retrospective cohort study of COVID-19 hospitalized patients who required non-invasive respiratory support. The impact of these treatments was evaluated in three groups of patients: pre-intensive care patients, discharged patients from critical care unit (CCU) and non-CCU admitted patients. The impact was assessed 30 days after completing respiratory therapy and was categorized as hospital discharge, transfer to a rehabilitation center, admission to the UCC and deceased. Results: a total of 80 patients were included (average age: 65.9 ± 11.9; men = 45 [56.3%]). 29 (36.3%) patients received BIPAP, 35 (43.8%) CPAP and 27 (33.4%) high-oxygen nasal cannula. Regarding the groups for the indication of respiratory treatment, 37 (46.3%) patients corresponded to the pre-intensive care patients, 24 (30%) were discharged patients from the CCU and 19 (23.8%) to the non-CCU admitted group. In the pre-intensive care, admission to a CCU was avoided in 19 (52.8%) patients and, on the other hand, 14 (38.9%) patients finally were admitted in a CCU. In the group of discharged patients from the UCC 19 (82.6%) patients showed a favorable course of disease. Only 3 (13%) patients were admitted in a UCC or died. Finally, in the group of non-CCU admitted, 6 (31.3%) improved after the use of respiratory therapy and 13 (68.4%) were deceased. Conclusions: respiratory therapies have a favorable impact on critically ill patients affected by COVID-19, both in patients with an indication for admission in the CCU, in those who are discharged from the CCUs and in those who do not have criteria for admission in these units.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 245
Author(s):  
Khaloud S. Almukhaini ◽  
Najwa M. Al-Rahbi

Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and high-flow nasal cannulae therapy (HFNCT) are first-line methods of treatment for children presenting with acute respiratory distress, with paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) providing an ideal environment for subsequent treatment monitoring. However, the availability of step-down units, where NIV and HFNCT can be safely utilised, has reduced the need for such patients to be admitted to PICUs, thereby leading to the better overall utilisation of critical care resources. In addition, NIV and HFNCT can also be used during transport instead of invasive ventilation, thus avoiding the complications associated with the latter approach. This review article examines the safety and applicability of these respiratory support approaches outside of paediatric intensive care as well as various factors associated with treatment success or failure.Keywords: Critical Care; Children; Pediatric Intensive Care Units; Noninvasive Ventilation; Nasal Cannulae; Transportation of Patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document