Mapping Replication Timing in Single Mammalian Cells

2022 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel A. Bartlett ◽  
Vishnu Dileep ◽  
Timour Baslan ◽  
David M. Gilbert
2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 3569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lilas Courtot ◽  
Jean-Sébastien Hoffmann ◽  
Valérie Bergoglio

Genome stability requires tight regulation of DNA replication to ensure that the entire genome of the cell is duplicated once and only once per cell cycle. In mammalian cells, origin activation is controlled in space and time by a cell-specific and robust program called replication timing. About 100,000 potential replication origins form on the chromatin in the gap 1 (G1) phase but only 20–30% of them are active during the DNA replication of a given cell in the synthesis (S) phase. When the progress of replication forks is slowed by exogenous or endogenous impediments, the cell must activate some of the inactive or “dormant” origins to complete replication on time. Thus, the many origins that may be activated are probably key to protect the genome against replication stress. This review aims to discuss the role of these dormant origins as safeguards of the human genome during replicative stress.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 4058-4100
Author(s):  
Hisashi Miura ◽  
Saori Takahashi ◽  
Takahiro Shibata ◽  
Koji Nagao ◽  
Chikashi Obuse ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saori Takahashi ◽  
Hisashi Miura ◽  
Takahiro Shibata ◽  
Koji Nagao ◽  
Katsuzumi Okumura ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTHere, we report the establishment of a single-cell DNA replication sequencing method, scRepli-seq, which is a simple genome-wide methodology that measures copy number differences between replicated and unreplicated DNA. Using scRepli-seq, we demonstrate that replication domain organization is conserved among individual mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs). Differentiated mESCs exhibited distinct replication profiles, which were conserved from cell to cell. Haplotype-resolved scRepli-seq revealed similar replication timing profiles of homologous autosomes, while the inactive X chromosome was clearly replicated later than its active counterpart. However, a small degree of cell-to-cell replication timing heterogeneity was present, and we discovered that developmentally regulated domains are a source of such variability, suggesting a link between cell-to-cell heterogeneity and developmental plasticity. Together, our results form a foundation for single-cell-level understanding of DNA replication regulation and provide insights into 3D genome organization.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vishnu Dileep ◽  
David M. Gilbert

AbstractIn mammalian cells, distinct replication domains (RDs), corresponding to structural units of chromosomes called topologically-associating domains (TADs), replicate at different times during S-phase1–4. Further, early/late replication of RDs corresponds to active/inactive chromatin interaction compartments5,6. Although replication origins are selected stochastically, such that each cell is using a different cohort of origins to replicate their genomes7–12, replication-timing is regulated independently and upstream of origin selection13 and evidence suggests that replication timing is conserved in consecutive cell cycles14. Hence, quantifying the extent of cell-to-cell variation in replication timing is central to studies of chromosome structure and function. Here we devise a strategy to measure variation in single-cell replication timing using DNA copy number. We find that borders between replicated and un-replicated DNA are highly conserved between cells, demarcating active and inactive compartments of the nucleus. Nonetheless, measurable variation was evident. Surprisingly, we detected a similar degree of variation in replication timing from cell-to-cell, between homologues within cells, and between all domains genome-wide regardless of their replication timing. These results demonstrate that stochastic variation in replication timing is independent of elements that dictate timing or extrinsic environmental variation.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Takuya Hayakawa ◽  
Rino Suzuki ◽  
Kazuhiro Kagotani ◽  
Katsuzumi Okumura ◽  
Shin-ichiro Takebayashi

E/L Repli-seq is a powerful tool for detecting cell type-specific replication landscapes in mammalian cells, but its potential to monitor DNA replication under replication stress awaits better understanding. Here, we used E/L Repli-seq to examine the temporal order of DNA replication in human retinal pigment epithelium cells treated with the topoisomerase I inhibitor camptothecin. We found that the replication profiles by E/L Repli-seq exhibit characteristic patterns after replication-stress induction, including the loss of specific initiation zones within individual early replication timing domains. We also observed global disappearance of the replication timing domain structures in the profiles, which can be explained by checkpoint-dependent suppression of replication initiation. Thus, our results demonstrate the effectiveness of E/L Repli-seq at identifying cells with replication-stress-induced altered DNA replication programs.


Genes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phoebe Oldach ◽  
Conrad A. Nieduszynski

3D genome organization is strongly predictive of DNA replication timing in mammalian cells. This work tested the extent to which loop-based genome architecture acts as a regulatory unit of replication timing by using an auxin-inducible system for acute cohesin ablation. Cohesin ablation in a population of cells in asynchronous culture was shown not to disrupt patterns of replication timing as assayed by replication sequencing (RepliSeq) or BrdU-focus microscopy. Furthermore, cohesin ablation prior to S phase entry in synchronized cells was similarly shown to not impact replication timing patterns. These results suggest that cohesin-mediated genome architecture is not required for the execution of replication timing patterns in S phase, nor for the establishment of replication timing domains in G1.


2017 ◽  
Vol 217 (2) ◽  
pp. 541-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily J. Platt ◽  
Leslie Smith ◽  
Mathew J. Thayer

Mammalian cells replicate their chromosomes via a temporal replication program. The ASAR6 and ASAR15 genes were identified as loci that when disrupted result in delayed replication and condensation of entire human chromosomes. ASAR6 and ASAR15 are monoallelically expressed long noncoding RNAs that remain associated with the chromosome from which they are transcribed. The chromosome-wide effects of ASAR6 map to the antisense strand of an L1 retrotransposon within ASAR6 RNA, deletion or inversion of which delayed replication of human chromosome 6. Furthermore, ectopic integration of ASAR6 or ASAR15 transgenes into mouse chromosomes resulted in delayed replication and condensation, an increase in H3K27me3, coating of the mouse chromosome with ASAR RNA, and a loss of mouse Cot-1 RNA expression in cis. Targeting the antisense strand of the L1 within ectopically expressed ASAR6 RNA restored normal replication timing. Our results provide direct evidence that L1 antisense RNA plays a functional role in chromosome-wide replication timing of mammalian chromosomes.


2012 ◽  
Vol 31 (18) ◽  
pp. 3678-3690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Cornacchia ◽  
Vishnu Dileep ◽  
Jean-Pierre Quivy ◽  
Rossana Foti ◽  
Federico Tili ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tyrone Ryba ◽  
Dana Battaglia ◽  
Benjamin Pope ◽  
Ichiro Hiratani ◽  
David Gilbert

Author(s):  
Lilas Courtot ◽  
Elodie Bournique ◽  
Chrystelle Maric ◽  
Laure Guitton-Sert ◽  
Miguel Madrid-Mencía ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTDNA replication is well orchestrated in mammalian cells through a tight regulation of the temporal order of replication origin activation, named the replication timing, a robust and conserved process in each cell type. Upon low replication stress, the slowing of replication forks induces delayed replication of fragile regions leading to genetic instability. The impact of low replication stress on the replication timing in different cellular backgrounds has not been explored yet. Here we analysed the whole genome replication timing in a panel of 6 human cell lines under low replication stress. We first demonstrated that cancer cells were more impacted than non-tumour cells. Strikingly, we unveiled an enrichment of specific replication domains undergoing a switch from late to early replication in some cancer cells. We found that advances in replication timing correlate with heterochromatin regions poorly sensitive to DNA damage signalling while being subject to an increase of chromatin accessibility. Finally, our data indicate that, following release from replication stress conditions, replication timing advances can be inherited by the next cellular generation, suggesting a new mechanism by which cancer cells would adapt to cellular or environmental stress.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document