scholarly journals The Protective Role of Dormant Origins in Response to Replicative Stress

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 3569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lilas Courtot ◽  
Jean-Sébastien Hoffmann ◽  
Valérie Bergoglio
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Replication Timing ◽  
Protective Role ◽  
Entire Genome ◽  
Replicative Stress ◽  
A Cell ◽  
The Many

Genome stability requires tight regulation of DNA replication to ensure that the entire genome of the cell is duplicated once and only once per cell cycle. In mammalian cells, origin activation is controlled in space and time by a cell-specific and robust program called replication timing. About 100,000 potential replication origins form on the chromatin in the gap 1 (G1) phase but only 20–30% of them are active during the DNA replication of a given cell in the synthesis (S) phase. When the progress of replication forks is slowed by exogenous or endogenous impediments, the cell must activate some of the inactive or “dormant” origins to complete replication on time. Thus, the many origins that may be activated are probably key to protect the genome against replication stress. This review aims to discuss the role of these dormant origins as safeguards of the human genome during replicative stress.

scholarly journals The Protecting Role of Dormant Origins in Response to Replicative Stress

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lilas Courtot ◽  
Jean-Sébastien Hoffmann ◽  
Valérie Bergoglio
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Replication Timing ◽  
G1 Phase ◽  
Human Chromosomes ◽  
Entire Genome ◽  
Replicative Stress ◽  
Origin Activation ◽  
A Cell

Maintenance of the human chromosomes stability requires a tight regulation of DNA replication to duplicate once and only once the entire genome of a single cell. In mammalians cells, origin activation is controlled in space and time by a cell specific and robust program called replication timing. About 100 000 of potential origins are loaded onto the chromatin at the G1 phase but only 20-30% are selected and active during the replication of a given cell. When the replication fork is slowed down by exogenous or endogenous sources, the cell need to activate more origins to complete the replication on time. Thus, the large choice of origins that can be activated may be a key player in the protection of the genome. The aim of this review is to discuss about the role of these dormant origins as housekeepers of the human genome in response to replicative stress.

scholarly journals The Amazing Acrobat: Yeast’s Histone H3K56 Juggles Several Important Roles While Maintaining Perfect Balance

Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 342
Author(s):  
Lihi Gershon ◽  
Martin Kupiec
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Entry And Exit ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
M Phase ◽  
Dna Replication And Repair ◽  
H3k56 Acetylation ◽  
Timely Fashion ◽  
The Many

Acetylation on lysine 56 of histone H3 of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been implicated in many cellular processes that affect genome stability. Despite being the object of much research, the complete scope of the roles played by K56 acetylation is not fully understood even today. The acetylation is put in place at the S-phase of the cell cycle, in order to flag newly synthesized histones that are incorporated during DNA replication. The signal is removed by two redundant deacetylases, Hst3 and Hst4, at the entry to G2/M phase. Its crucial location, at the entry and exit points of the DNA into and out of the nucleosome, makes this a central modification, and dictates that if acetylation and deacetylation are not well concerted and executed in a timely fashion, severe genomic instability arises. In this review, we explore the wealth of information available on the many roles played by H3K56 acetylation and the deacetylases Hst3 and Hst4 in DNA replication and repair.

scholarly journals The Temporal Order of DNA Replication Shaped by Mammalian DNA Methyltransferases

Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 266
Author(s):  
Shin-ichiro Takebayashi ◽  
Tyrone Ryba ◽  
Kelsey Wimbish ◽  
Takuya Hayakawa ◽  
Morito Sakaue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Temporal Order ◽  
Expression System ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Replication Timing ◽  
Dna Methyltransferases ◽  
Dna Hypomethylation ◽  
Transcriptional Changes ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Genomic Regions

Multiple epigenetic pathways underlie the temporal order of DNA replication (replication timing) in the contexts of development and disease. DNA methylation by DNA methyltransferases (Dnmts) and downstream chromatin reorganization and transcriptional changes are thought to impact DNA replication, yet this remains to be comprehensively tested. Using cell-based and genome-wide approaches to measure replication timing, we identified a number of genomic regions undergoing subtle but reproducible replication timing changes in various Dnmt-mutant mouse embryonic stem (ES) cell lines that included a cell line with a drug-inducible Dnmt3a2 expression system. Replication timing within pericentromeric heterochromatin (PH) was shown to be correlated with redistribution of H3K27me3 induced by DNA hypomethylation: Later replicating PH coincided with H3K27me3-enriched regions. In contrast, this relationship with H3K27me3 was not evident within chromosomal arm regions undergoing either early-to-late (EtoL) or late-to-early (LtoE) switching of replication timing upon loss of the Dnmts. Interestingly, Dnmt-sensitive transcriptional up- and downregulation frequently coincided with earlier and later shifts in replication timing of the chromosomal arm regions, respectively. Our study revealed the previously unrecognized complex and diverse effects of the Dnmts loss on the mammalian DNA replication landscape.

Mapping replication timing domains genome wide in single mammalian cells with single-cell DNA replication sequencing

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 4058-4100
Author(s):  
Hisashi Miura ◽  
Saori Takahashi ◽  
Takahiro Shibata ◽  
Koji Nagao ◽  
Chikashi Obuse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Single Cell ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Replication Timing ◽  
Genome Wide

scholarly journals The Main Role of Srs2 in DNA Repair Depends on Its Helicase Activity, Rather than on Its Interactions with PCNA or Rad51

mBio ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Bronstein ◽  
Lihi Gershon ◽  
Gilad Grinberg ◽  
Elisa Alonso-Perez ◽  
Martin Kupiec
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Dna Helicase ◽  
Main Role ◽  
Helicase Domain ◽  
Helicase Activity ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
Srs2 Helicase

ABSTRACTHomologous recombination (HR) is a mechanism that repairs a variety of DNA lesions. Under certain circumstances, however, HR can generate intermediates that can interfere with other cellular processes such as DNA transcription or replication. Cells have therefore developed pathways that abolish undesirable HR intermediates. TheSaccharomyces cerevisiaeyeast Srs2 helicase has a major role in one of these pathways. Srs2 also works during DNA replication and interacts with the clamp PCNA. The relative importance of Srs2’s helicase activity, Rad51 removal function, and PCNA interaction in genome stability remains unclear. We created a newSRS2allele [srs2(1-850)] that lacks the whole C terminus, containing the interaction site for Rad51 and PCNA and interactions with many other proteins. Thus, the new allele encodes an Srs2 protein bearing only the activity of the DNA helicase. We find that the interactions of Srs2 with Rad51 and PCNA are dispensable for the main role of Srs2 in the repair of DNA damage in vegetative cells and for proper completion of meiosis. On the other hand, it has been shown that in cells impaired for the DNA damage tolerance (DDT) pathways, Srs2 generates toxic intermediates that lead to DNA damage sensitivity; we show that this negative Srs2 activity requires the C terminus of Srs2. Dissection of the genetic interactions of thesrs2(1-850) allele suggest a role for Srs2’s helicase activity in sister chromatid cohesion. Our results also indicate that Srs2’s function becomes more central in diploid cells.IMPORTANCEHomologous recombination (HR) is a key mechanism that repairs damaged DNA. However, this process has to be tightly regulated; failure to regulate it can lead to genome instability. The Srs2 helicase is considered a regulator of HR; it was shown to be able to evict the recombinase Rad51 from DNA. Cells lacking Srs2 exhibit sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents, and in some cases, they display defects in DNA replication. The relative roles of the helicase and Rad51 removal activities of Srs2 in genome stability remain unclear. To address this question, we created a new Srs2 mutant which has only the DNA helicase domain. Our study shows that only the DNA helicase domain is needed to deal with DNA damage and assist in DNA replication during vegetative growth and in meiosis. Thus, our findings shift the view on the role of Srs2 in the maintenance of genome integrity.

scholarly journals Genome-wide stability of the DNA replication program in single mammalian cells

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saori Takahashi ◽  
Hisashi Miura ◽  
Takahiro Shibata ◽  
Koji Nagao ◽  
Katsuzumi Okumura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Developmental Plasticity ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Replication Timing ◽  
Small Degree ◽  
3D Genome ◽  
Inactive X Chromosome ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Individual Mouse

ABSTRACTHere, we report the establishment of a single-cell DNA replication sequencing method, scRepli-seq, which is a simple genome-wide methodology that measures copy number differences between replicated and unreplicated DNA. Using scRepli-seq, we demonstrate that replication domain organization is conserved among individual mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs). Differentiated mESCs exhibited distinct replication profiles, which were conserved from cell to cell. Haplotype-resolved scRepli-seq revealed similar replication timing profiles of homologous autosomes, while the inactive X chromosome was clearly replicated later than its active counterpart. However, a small degree of cell-to-cell replication timing heterogeneity was present, and we discovered that developmentally regulated domains are a source of such variability, suggesting a link between cell-to-cell heterogeneity and developmental plasticity. Together, our results form a foundation for single-cell-level understanding of DNA replication regulation and provide insights into 3D genome organization.

scholarly journals CDK2 activity determines the timing of cell-cycle commitment and sequential DNA replication

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sungsoo Kim ◽  
Alessandra Leong ◽  
Chellam Nayar ◽  
Minah Kim ◽  
Hee Won Yang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Threshold Level ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinases ◽  
Safety Mechanism ◽  
Cdk2 Activity ◽  
Tightly Coupled ◽  
Rb Phosphorylation

AbstractTo enter the cell cycle, mammalian cells must cross a point of no return (the commitment point), after which they proceed through the cell cycle regardless of changes in external signaling. This process is tightly regulated by the cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) and downstream molecules such as retinoblastoma (Rb). Here we show that CDK2 activity coordinates the timing of cell-cycle commitment and DNA replication. CDK4/6 activation initiates Rb phosphorylation and E2F activity, causing a gradual increase in CDK2 activity. Once CDK2 activity reaches a threshold level, CDK2 triggers the commitment point by maintaining Rb phosphorylation and subsequently initiates DNA replication. While the timing of the commitment point is tightly coupled with DNA replication, our experiments, which acutely increased CDK2 activity, suggest that the timing of the commitment point is before DNA replication. These findings highlight how cells utilize a safety mechanism to maintain genome stability by protecting against incomplete DNA replication.

scholarly journals ATRIP protects progenitor cells against DNA damage in vivo

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel E. Matos-Rodrigues ◽  
Paulius Grigaravicius ◽  
Bernard S. Lopez ◽  
Thomas Hofmann ◽  
Pierre-Olivier Frappart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Progenitor Cells ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Genomic Stability ◽  
Interacting Protein ◽  
Replicative Stress ◽  
Dependent Cell ◽  
Short Life Expectancy

AbstractThe maintenance of genomic stability during the cell cycle of progenitor cells is essential for the faithful transmission of genetic information. Mutations in genes that ensure genome stability lead to human developmental syndromes. Mutations in Ataxia Telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) or in ATR-interacting protein (ATRIP) lead to Seckel syndrome, which is characterized by developmental malformations and short life expectancy. While the roles of ATR in replicative stress response and chromosomal segregation are well established, it is unknown how ATRIP contributes to maintaining genomic stability in progenitor cells in vivo. Here, we generated the first mouse model to investigate ATRIP function. Conditional inactivation of Atrip in progenitor cells of the CNS and eye led to microcephaly, microphthalmia and postnatal lethality. To understand the mechanisms underlying these malformations, we used lens progenitor cells as a model and found that ATRIP loss promotes replicative stress and TP53-dependent cell death. Trp53 inactivation in Atrip-deficient progenitor cells rescued apoptosis but increased mitotic DNA damage and mitotic defects. Our findings demonstrate an essential role of ATRIP in preventing DNA damage accumulation during unchallenged replication.

scholarly journals Replication timing analysis in polyploid cells reveals Rif1 uses multiple mechanisms to promote underreplication in Drosophila

Genetics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Souradip Das ◽  
Madison Caballero ◽  
Tatyana Kolesnikova ◽  
Igor Zhimulev ◽  
Amnon Koren ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Copy Number ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Timing Analysis ◽  
Replication Timing ◽  
Critical Function ◽  
Replication Fork Progression ◽  
Polyploid Cells ◽  
Genomic Regions ◽  
Insight Into

Abstract Regulation of DNA replication and copy number is necessary to promote genome stability and maintain cell and tissue function. DNA replication is regulated temporally in a process known as replication timing (RT). Rap1-interacting factor 1 (Rif1) is a key regulator of RT and has a critical function in copy number control in polyploid cells. Previously, we demonstrated that Rif1 functions with SUUR to inhibit replication fork progression and promote underreplication (UR) of specific genomic regions. How Rif1-dependent control of RT factors into its ability to promote UR is unknown. By applying a computational approach to measure RT in Drosophila polyploid cells, we show that SUUR and Rif1 have differential roles in controlling UR and RT. Our findings reveal that Rif1 acts to promote late replication, which is necessary for SUUR-dependent underreplication. Our work provides new insight into the process of UR and its links to RT.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document