scholarly journals Worldwide border interceptions provide a window into human‐mediated global insect movement

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca M. Turner ◽  
Eckehard G. Brockerhoff ◽  
Cleo Bertelsmeier ◽  
Rachael E. Blake ◽  
Barney Caton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

1970 ◽  
Vol 3 (11) ◽  
pp. 939-941 ◽  
Author(s):  
M L Luff ◽  
L Molyneux


2003 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-64
Author(s):  
Björn Malmqvist ◽  
V. Benno Meyer-Rochow ◽  
Hans Silfverberg

Wichard, W., Ahrens, W. & Eisenbeis, G. 2002: Biological Atlas of Aquatic Insects. — Apollo Books, Stenstrup (Denmark). 338 pp. 490 DKK. Woiwood, I. P., Reynolds, D. R. & Thomas, C. D. 2001: Insect Movement: mechanisms and consequences. CABI-Publishing, Wallingford, Oxon (U.K.) and New York (U.S.A.). 458 pp. Romero Samper, J. 2002: Iconografía del género Iberodorcadion. — Argania editio (Barcelona),192 pp. Price 105 Euros.



1999 ◽  
Vol 354 (1388) ◽  
pp. 1479-1495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugh D. Loxdale ◽  
Gugs Lushai

The majority of insect species do not show an innate behavioural migration, but rather populations expand into favourable new habitats or contract away from unfavourable ones by random changes of spatial scale. Over the past 50 years, the scientific fascination with dramatic long–distance and directed mass migratory events has overshadowed the more universal mode of population movement, involving much smaller stochastic displacement during the lifetime of the insects concerned. This may be limiting our understanding of insect population dynamics. In the following synthesis, we provide an overview of how herbivorous insect movement is governed by both abiotic and biotic factors, making these animals essentially ‘slaves of their environment’. No displaced insect or insect population can leave a resource patch, migrate and flourish, leaving descendants, unless suitable habitat and/or resources are reached during movement. This must have constrained insects over geological time, bringing about species–specific adaptation in behaviour and movements in relation to their environment at a micro– and macrogeographical scale. With insects that undergo long–range spatial displacements, e.g. aphids and locusts, there is presumably a selection against movement unless overruled by factors, such as density–dependent triggering, which cause certain genotypes within the population to migrate. However, for most insect species, spatial changes of scale and range expansion are much slower and may occur over a much longer time–scale, and are not innate (nor directed). Ecologists may say that all animals and plants are figuratively speaking ‘slaves of their environments’, in the sense that their distribution is defined by their ecology and genotype. But in the case of insects, a vast number must perish daily, either out at sea or over other hostile habitats, having failed to find suitable resources and/or a habitat on which to feed and reproduce. Since many are blown by the vagaries of the wind, their chances of success are serendipitous in the extreme, especially over large distances. Hence, the strategies adopted by mass migratory species (innate pre–programmed flight behaviour, large population sizes and/or fast reproduction), which improve the chances that some of these individuals will succeed. We also emphasize the dearth of knowledge in the various interactions of insect movement and their environment, and describe how molecular markers (protein and DNA) may be used to examine the details of spatial scale over which movement occurs in relation to insect ecology and genotype.



2020 ◽  
Vol 152 (6) ◽  
pp. 823-829
Author(s):  
Alexandre M.M.C. Loureiro ◽  
Vilis O. Nams

AbstractUnderstanding what drives insect movement is crucial to understanding how they might be affected by environmental or human disturbances. Methods that measure movement can be expensive, and few are available that do not rely on some sort of video footage. We developed a relatively inexpensive method that allows the user to see the full path of the individual insects within an arena after a certain amount of time, which can be captured with a photograph and later analysed with computer software applications. In our proof-of-concept experiment, we found that the ground beetle, Harpalus rufipes (Coleoptera: Carabidae), was more active in darkness and in light than in ultraviolet light and that it displayed different movement patterns under all three light treatments.



2004 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott N. Johnson ◽  
Derek B. Read ◽  
Peter J. Gregory


1991 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 955-963 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Turchin ◽  
F. J. Odendaal ◽  
M. D. Rausher
Keyword(s):  


1999 ◽  
Vol 89 (6) ◽  
pp. 557-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Turner ◽  
Y.-H. Song ◽  
K.-B. Uhm

AbstractThis paper reports on the performance of an atmospheric numerical model called BLAYER which has been adapted to forecast the movement of migrant brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens (Stål) and white-backed planthopper Sogatella furcifera (Horvarth) populations from China to Korea. Comparison of model forecasts with trapping data for the 1987 and 1988 migration seasons indicated: (i) that the model is capable of successfully simulating the movement of planthoppers to Korea; (ii) that the model has sufficient detail to simulate insect movement into different regions of Korea; (iii) the source region for early season migrants is most likely to be south-eastern China (i.e. south of 25°N and east of 115°E); (iv) later season migrants may not necessarily always originate from an expanded northward region (south of 30°N); (v) the flight level of migrants may vary from about 500 to 2000 m altitude from one migration episode to another; and (vi) flight times ranging between 24 and 45 h are required to explain the migratory influxes. The results reported here have led to BLAYER forecasts of planthopper migration being produced on an operational basis within Korea.





Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document