Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance parameters and biomarkers following myocardial infarction; 10 year follow‐up of the Eplerenone Remodeling in Myocardial Infarction without Heart Failure trial

Author(s):  
Robin AP Weir ◽  
Suzanne Clements ◽  
Tracey Steedman ◽  
Henry J Dargie ◽  
John JV McMurray
2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Holzknecht ◽  
M Reindl ◽  
C Tiller ◽  
I Lechner ◽  
T Hornung ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is the parameter of choice for left ventricular (LV) function assessment and risk stratification of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI); however, its prognostic value is limited. Other measures of LV function such as global longitudinal strain (GLS) and mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) might provide additional prognostic information post-STEMI. However, comprehensive investigations comparing these parameters in terms of prediction of hard clinical events following STEMI are lacking so far. Purpose We aimed to investigate the comparative prognostic value of LVEF, MAPSE and GLS by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in the acute stage post-STEMI for the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Methods This observational study included 407 consecutive acute STEMI patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Comprehensive CMR investigations were performed 3 [interquartile range (IQR): 2–4] days after PCI to determine LVEF, GLS and MAPSE as well as myocardial infarct characteristics. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of MACE defined as composite of death, re-infarction and congestive heart failure. Results During a follow-up of 21 [IQR: 12–50] months, 40 (10%) patients experienced MACE. LVEF (p=0.005), MAPSE (p=0.001) and GLS (p<0.001) were significantly related to MACE. GLS showed the highest prognostic value with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.71 (95% CI 0.63–0.79; p<0.001) compared to MAPSE (AUC: 0.67, 95% CI 0.58–0.75; p=0.001) and LVEF (AUC: 0.64, 95% CI 0.54–0.73; p=0.005). After multivariable analysis, GLS emerged as sole independent predictor of MACE (HR: 1.22, 95% CI 1.11–1.35; p<0.001). Of note, GLS remained associated with MACE (p<0.001) even after adjustment for infarct size and microvascular obstruction. Conclusion CMR-derived GLS emerged as strong and independent predictor of MACE after acute STEMI with additive prognostic validity to LVEF and parameters of myocardial damage. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Vera Sainz ◽  
A Cecconi ◽  
P Martinez-Vives ◽  
MJ Olivera ◽  
S Hernandez ◽  
...  

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background In patients admitted for heart failure (HF) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and a concomitant high-rate supraventricular tachyarrhythmia (SVT) it is challenging to predict LVEF recovery after heart rate control and distinguish tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy (TIC) from dilated cardiomyopathy (DC). The role of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and the electrocardiogram (ECG) in this setting remains unsettled. Methods Forty-three consecutive patients admitted for HF due to high-rate SVT and LVEF <50% undergoing CMR in the acute phase were retrospectively included. Those who had LVEF >50% at follow up were classified as TIC and those with LVEF <50% were classified as DC. Clinical, laboratory, CMR and ECG findings were analyzed to predict LVEF recovery. Results Twenty-five (58%) patients were classified as TIC. Patients with DC had wider QRS (121.2 ± 26 vs 97.7 ± 17.35 ms; p = 0.003). On CRM the TIC group presented with higher LVEF (33.4 ± 11 vs 26.9 ± 6.4% p = 0.019) whereas late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was more frequent in DC group (61 vs 16% p = 0.004). On multivariate analysis, QRS duration ≥100 ms (p = 0.027), LVEF < 40% on CMR (p = 0.047) and presence of LGE (p = 0.03) were identified as independent predictors of lack of LVEF recovery. Furthermore, during clinical follow-up (median 60 months) DC patients were admitted more frequently for HF (44% vs 0%; p < 0.001) than TIC patients (Figure 1). Conclusion In patients with reduced LVEF admitted for HF due to high-rate SVT, QRS duration ≥100 ms, LVEF <40% on CMR and presence of LGE are independently associated with lack of LVEF recovery and worse clinical outcome.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Schneider ◽  
T H Huemme ◽  
J Schwab ◽  
B Gerecke ◽  
U Desch ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy (LVNC) is characterized by an increased number of LV trabeculations with deep intertrabecular recesses. This abnormality is associated with heart failure, arrhythmias and arterial embolic events (AE). At present, it is unknown if AE is mainly due to blood stasis within the intertrabecular recesses, reduced LV ejection fraction or concomitant atrial fibrillation. LVNC is usually diagnosed by echocardiography but cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) has evolved as an alternative method. This study assessed the prognostic value of CMRI for arterial embolic events in patients (pts) with LVNC. Methods 34 consecutive pts (19m, 15f, age 53±16) with LVNC underwent cine and contrast-enhanced CMRI with a 1.5 T scanner. LV diameter, volume, ejection fraction, and ratio of noncompacted to compacted myocardium (NC/C) were determined, and in 32 pts presence and localization of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was assessed. Clinical and CMRI findings were compared in pts with and without LV thrombus and/or AE. Results Overall, 20 pts (59%) were in heart failure NYHA III or IV, 14 (41%) had left bundle branch block (LBBB), 7 (21%) paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and 6 (19%) ventricular tachycardia (VT). By CMRI, LV diameter in end-diastole (66±8 mm), end-systole (53±10 mm), end-diastolic (229±69 ml) and end-systolic volume (150±68 ml) were enlarged and ejection fraction (36±14%) was reduced. The NC/C ratio was 3.2±1.4 in end-diastole and 2.6±1.4 in end-systole. One pt had right ventricular involvement with a thrombus. LGE was seen in 9/32 pts (28%) in the compacted myocardial layer (n=6), in the noncompacted trabecular layer (n=6) and within the papillary muscles (n=3). LGE was present in 3 areas in 1 and in 2 areas in 4 pts. In 3 pts (9%) a thrombus was seen within the trabecular layer which resolved under anticoagulation, and 6 additional pts (18%) without detectable thrombus experienced AE (transient ischemic attack n=1, stroke n=5). Thrombus and/or AE were not associated with age, sex, NYHA class, larger left atrial or LV diameter, LV volume, LBBB or documented VT. Atrial fibrillation (2/9 vs 5/25 pts, p=ns), LV ejection fraction (33±13% vs 38±15%, p=ns) and the NC/C ratio in end-diastole (median 3.2 vs 3) or end-systole (both median 2.6, p=ns) were similar. Thrombus and/or AE occurred mainly in pts with LGE (6/9 vs 2/23 pts, p=0.002). Conclusion In LVNC, evaluation by CMRI and demonstration of LGE in the compacted or noncompacted myocardium identifies patients at high risk for thrombus formation and/or arterial embolic events, warranting anticoagulation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document