scholarly journals Anthropometric factors and ovarian cancer risk: A systematic review and nonlinear dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies

2014 ◽  
Vol 136 (8) ◽  
pp. 1888-1898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dagfinn Aune ◽  
Deborah A. Navarro Rosenblatt ◽  
Doris Sau Man Chan ◽  
Leila Abar ◽  
Snieguole Vingeliene ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 125 (3) ◽  
pp. 758-763 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Rota ◽  
Elena Pasquali ◽  
Lorenza Scotti ◽  
Claudio Pelucchi ◽  
Irene Tramacere ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 1635-1648 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Aune ◽  
D.A. Navarro Rosenblatt ◽  
D.S.M. Chan ◽  
S. Vingeliene ◽  
L. Abar ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 5349-5359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asma Salari-Moghaddam ◽  
Alireza Milajerdi ◽  
Pamela J Surkan ◽  
Bagher Larijani ◽  
Ahmad Esmaillzadeh

Abstract Context Prospective studies on caffeine and different types of coffee intake in relation to the risk of ovarian cancer have shown conflicting results. Objective The aim of the present study was to perform a dose–response meta-analysis of cohort studies on the association between dietary caffeine intake, different types of coffee consumption, and the risk of ovarian cancer. Data sources PubMed/Medline, ISI Web of Science, Scopus, and EMBASE were searched to identify relevant studies reported until October 2018. Study selection Prospective cohort studies that had considered caffeine or different types of coffee as the exposure variable and ovarian cancer as the main outcome variable or as one of the outcome variables were included in our systematic review and meta-analysis. Two of us independently screened 9344 publications. A total of 14 cohort studies were included in the meta-analysis. Data extraction Two of us independently extracted the data. Any disagreements were resolved in consultation with the principal investigator. Results Combining 13 effect sizes, we found no substantial association between coffee consumption and risk of ovarian cancer [risk ratio (RR), 1.08; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.33]. Also, one additional cup daily of coffee consumption was marginally associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.05; P = 0.21; I2 = 0.0%; Pheterogeneity = 0.68). No statistically significant association was observed between caffeine intake or caffeinated or decaffeinated coffee consumption and the risk of ovarian cancer. Conclusions We found no statistically significant association between caffeine intake or different types of coffee and the risk of ovarian cancer.


Maturitas ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 94 ◽  
pp. 22-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ximena Gianuzzi ◽  
Gabriela Palma-Ardiles ◽  
Wendy Hernandez-Fernandez ◽  
Vinay Pasupuleti ◽  
Adrian V. Hernandez ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 1580
Author(s):  
Longgang Zhao ◽  
Chuanjie Deng ◽  
Zijin Lin ◽  
Edward Giovannucci ◽  
Xuehong Zhang

To quantify the associations between dietary fats and their major components, as well as serum levels of cholesterol, and liver cancer risk, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to October 2020 for prospective studies that reported the risk estimates of dietary fats and serum cholesterol for liver cancer risk. We carried out highest versus lowest intake or level and dose-response analyses. Higher intake of dietary saturated fatty acids (SFA) was associated with a higher liver cancer risk in both category analysis (relative risk [RR]highest vs. lowest intake = 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06, 1.69) and dose-response analysis (RR1% energy = 1.04, 95%CI: 1.01, 1.07). Higher serum total cholesterol was inversely associated with liver cancer but with large between-studies variability (RR1 mmol/L = 0.72, 95%CI: 0.69, 0.75, I2 = 75.3%). The inverse association was more pronounced for serum high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (RR1 mmol/L = 0.42, 95%CI: 0.27, 0.64). Higher intake of dietary SFA was associated with higher risk of liver cancer while higher serum levels of cholesterol and HDL were associated with a lower risk of liver cancer with high between-studies variability.


Oncotarget ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (29) ◽  
pp. 20807-20815 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimiliano Berretta ◽  
Agnieszka Micek ◽  
Alessandra Lafranconi ◽  
Sabrina Rossetti ◽  
Raffaele Di Francia ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 4829-4837 ◽  
Author(s):  
Da-Peng Li ◽  
Chen Du ◽  
Zuo-Ming Zhang ◽  
Guang-Xiao Li ◽  
Zhi-Fu Yu ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Veronika S. Biller ◽  
Michael F. Leitzmann ◽  
Anja M. Sedlmeier ◽  
Felix F. Berger ◽  
Olaf Ortmann ◽  
...  

AbstractSedentary behaviour is an emerging risk factor for several site-specific cancers. Ovarian cancers are often detected at late disease stages and the role of sedentary behaviour as a modifiable risk factor potentially contributing to ovarian cancer risk has not been extensively examined. We systematically searched relevant databases from inception to February 2020 for eligible publications dealing with sedentary behaviour in relation to ovarian cancer risk. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, calculating summary relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a random-effects model. We calculated the E-Value, a sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding. We tested for publication bias and heterogeneity. Seven studies (three prospective cohort studies and four case–control studies) including 2060 ovarian cancer cases were analysed. Comparing highest versus lowest levels of sedentary behaviour, the data indicated a statistically significant increase in the risk of ovarian cancer in relation to prolonged sitting time (RR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.07–1.57). Sub-analyses of prospective cohort studies (RR = 1.33, 95% CI = 0.92–1.93) and case–control studies (RR = 1.28, 95% CI = 0.98–1.68) showed statistically non-significant results. Sensitivity analysis showed that an unmeasured confounder would need to be related to sedentary behaviour and ovarian cancer with a RR of 1.90 to fully explain away the observed RR of 1.29. Our analyses showed a statistically significant positive association between sedentary behaviour and ovarian cancer risk.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document