The role of groundwater in the Amazon water cycle: 3. Influence on terrestrial water storage computations and comparison with GRACE

2013 ◽  
Vol 118 (8) ◽  
pp. 3233-3244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yadu N. Pokhrel ◽  
Ying Fan ◽  
Gonzalo Miguez-Macho ◽  
Pat J.-F. Yeh ◽  
Shin-Chan Han
Keyword(s):  
Water Cycle ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Terrestrial Water Storage ◽  
Terrestrial Water

scholarly journals The importance of vegetation to understand terrestrial water storage variations

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tina Trautmann ◽  
Sujan Koirala ◽  
Nuno Carvalhais ◽  
Andreas Güntner ◽  
Martin Jung
Keyword(s):  
Soil Moisture ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Intermediate Water ◽  
Model Structure ◽  
Hydrological Models ◽  
Terrestrial Water Storage ◽  
Terrestrial Water

Abstract. So far, various studies aimed at decomposing the integrated terrestrial water storage variations observed by satellite gravimetry (GRACE, GRACE-FO) with the help of large-scale hydrological models. While the results of the storage decomposition depend on model structure, little attention has been given to the impact of the way how vegetation is represented in these models. Although vegetation structure and activity represent the crucial link between water, carbon and energy cycles, their representation in large-scale hydrological models remains a major source of uncertainty. At the same time, the increasing availability and quality of Earth observation-based vegetation data provide valuable information with good prospects for improving model simulations and gaining better insights into the role of vegetation within the global water cycle. In this study, we use observation-based vegetation information such as vegetation indices and rooting depths for spatializing the parameters of a simple global hydrological model to define infiltration, root water uptake and transpiration processes. The parameters are further constrained by considering observations of terrestrial water storage anomalies (TWS), soil moisture, evapotranspiration (ET) and gridded runoff (Q) estimates in a multi-criteria calibration approach. We assess the implications of including vegetation on the simulation results, with a particular focus on the partitioning between water storage components. To isolate the effect of vegetation, we compare a model experiment with vegetation parameters varying in space and time to a baseline experiment in which all parameters are calibrated as static, globally uniform values. Both experiments show good overall performance, but including vegetation data led to even better performance and more physically plausible parameter values. Largest improvements regarding TWS and ET were seen in supply-limited (semi-arid) regions and in the tropics, whereas Q simulations improve mainly in northern latitudes. While the total fluxes and storages are similar, accounting for vegetation substantially changes the contributions of snow and different soil water storage components to the TWS variations, with the dominance of an intermediate water pool that interacts with the fast plant accessible soil moisture and the delayed water storage. The findings indicate the important role of deeper moisture storages as well as groundwater-soil moisture-vegetation interactions as a key to understanding TWS variations. We highlight the need for further observations to identify the adequate model structure rather than only model parameters for a reasonable representation and interpretation of vegetation-water interactions.

scholarly journals Past terrestrial water storage (1980–2008) in the Amazon Basin reconstructed from GRACE and in situ river gauging data

2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 533-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Becker ◽  
B. Meyssignac ◽  
L. Xavier ◽  
A. Cazenave ◽  
R. Alkama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Amazon Basin ◽  
Hydrological Modeling ◽  
Water Cycle ◽  
Southern Oscillation ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Terrestrial Water Storage ◽  
Direct Estimate ◽  
Terrestrial Water

Abstract. Terrestrial water storage (TWS) composed of surface waters, soil moisture, groundwater and snow where appropriate, is a key element of global and continental water cycle. Since 2002, the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) space gravimetry mission provides a new tool to measure large-scale TWS variations. However, for the past few decades, direct estimate of TWS variability is accessible from hydrological modeling only. Here we propose a novel approach that combines GRACE-based TWS spatial patterns with multi-decadal-long in situ river level records, to reconstruct past 2-D TWS over a river basin. Results are presented for the Amazon Basin for the period 1980–2008, focusing on the interannual time scale. Results are compared with past TWS estimated by the global hydrological model ISBA-TRIP. Correlations between reconstructed past interannual TWS variability and known climate forcing modes over the region (e.g., El Niño-Southern Oscillation and Pacific Decadal Oscillation) are also estimated. This method offers new perspective for improving our knowledge of past interannual TWS in world river basins where natural climate variability (as opposed to direct anthropogenic forcing) drives TWS variations.

The AmazonWater Cycle: Perspectives fromWater Budget Closure and Ocean Salinity

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-44
Author(s):  
J. E. Jack Reeves Eyre ◽  
Xubin Zeng
Keyword(s):  
Water Vapor ◽  
Land Surface ◽  
Water Cycle ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
River Mouth ◽  
Small Subset ◽  
Terrestrial Water Storage ◽  
Crucial Component ◽  
Ocean Salinity ◽  
Terrestrial Water

AbstractGlobal and regional water cycle includes precipitation, water vapor divergence, and change of column water vapor in the atmosphere, and land surface evapotranspiration, terrestrial water storage change, and river discharge which is linked to ocean salinity near the river mouth. The water cycle is a crucial component of the Earth system, and numerous studies have addressed its individual components (e.g., precipitation). Here we assess, for the first time, if remote sensing and reanalysis datasets can accurately and self consistently portray the Amazon water cycle. This is further assisted with satellite ocean salinity measurements near the mouth of the Amazon River. The widely-used practice of taking the mean of an ensemble of datasets to represent water cycle components (e.g., precipitation) can produce large biases in water cycle closure. Closure is achieved with only a small subset of data combinations (e.g., ERA5 reanalysis precipitation and evapotranspiration plus GRACE satellite terrestrial water storage), which rules out the lower precipitation and higher evapotranspiration estimates, providing valuable constraints on assessments of precipitation, evapotranspiration and their ratio. The common approach of using the Óbidos stream gauge (located hundreds of kilometres from the river mouth) multiplied by a constant (1.25) to represent the entire Amazon discharge is found to misrepresent the seasonal cycle, and this can affect the apparent influence of Amazon discharge on tropical Atlantic salinity.

scholarly journals Validation of terrestrial water storage variations as simulated by different global numerical models with GRACE satellite observations

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 821-837 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liangjing Zhang ◽  
Henryk Dobslaw ◽  
Tobias Stacke ◽  
Andreas Güntner ◽  
Robert Dill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Water Cycle ◽  
Numerical Models ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Terrestrial Water Storage ◽  
Satellite Mission ◽  
Validation Data ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Terrestrial Water ◽  
Grace Satellite

Abstract. Estimates of terrestrial water storage (TWS) variations from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite mission are used to assess the accuracy of four global numerical model realizations that simulate the continental branch of the global water cycle. Based on four different validation metrics, we demonstrate that for the 31 largest discharge basins worldwide all model runs agree with the observations to a very limited degree only, together with large spreads among the models themselves. Since we apply a common atmospheric forcing data set to all hydrological models considered, we conclude that those discrepancies are not entirely related to uncertainties in meteorologic input, but instead to the model structure and parametrization, and in particular to the representation of individual storage components with different spatial characteristics in each of the models. TWS as monitored by the GRACE mission is therefore a valuable validation data set for global numerical simulations of the terrestrial water storage since it is sensitive to very different model physics in individual basins, which offers helpful insight to modellers for the future improvement of large-scale numerical models of the global terrestrial water cycle.

scholarly journals Role of rivers in the seasonal variations of terrestrial water storage over global basins

2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (17) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyungjun Kim ◽  
Pat J.-F. Yeh ◽  
Taikan Oki ◽  
Shinjiro Kanae
Keyword(s):  
Seasonal Variations ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Terrestrial Water Storage ◽  
Terrestrial Water

Dynamics of Terrestrial Water Storage Change from Satellite and Surface Observations and Modeling

2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 156-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiuhong Tang ◽  
Huilin Gao ◽  
Pat Yeh ◽  
Taikan Oki ◽  
Fengge Su ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Cycle ◽  
Regional Scale ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Terrestrial Water Storage ◽  
Surface Observation ◽  
Grace Data ◽  
Terrestrial Water ◽  
Gravity Recovery ◽  
Storage Change ◽  
Surface Observations

Abstract Terrestrial water storage (TWS) is a fundamental component of the water cycle. On a regional scale, measurements of terrestrial water storage change (TWSC) are extremely scarce at any time scale. This study investigates the feasibility of estimating monthly-to-seasonal variations of regional TWSC from modeling and a combination of satellite and in situ surface observations based on water balance computations that use ground-based precipitation observations in both cases. The study area is the Klamath and Sacramento River drainage basins in the western United States (total area of about 110 000 km2). The TWSC from the satellite/surface observation–based estimates is compared with model results and land water storage from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) data. The results show that long-term evapotranspiration estimates and runoff measurements generally balance with observed precipitation, suggesting that the evapotranspiration estimates have relatively small bias for long averaging times. Observations show that storage change in water management reservoirs is about 12% of the seasonal amplitude of the TWSC cycle, but it can be up to 30% at the subbasin scale. Comparing with predevelopment conditions, the satellite/surface observation–based estimates show larger evapotranspiration and smaller runoff than do modeling estimates, suggesting extensive anthropogenic alteration of TWSC in the study area. Comparison of satellite/surface observation–based and GRACE TWSC shows that the seasonal cycle of terrestrial water storage is substantially underestimated by GRACE.

scholarly journals Past terrestrial water storage (1980–2008) in the Amazon Basin reconstructed from GRACE and in situ river gauging data

2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 8125-8155
Author(s):  
M. Becker ◽  
B. Meyssignac ◽  
L. Xavier ◽  
R. Alkama ◽  
B. Decharme
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Amazon Basin ◽  
Hydrological Modeling ◽  
Water Cycle ◽  
Southern Oscillation ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Terrestrial Water Storage ◽  
Direct Estimate ◽  
Terrestrial Water

Abstract. Terrestrial water storage (TWS) composed of surface waters, soil moisture, groundwater and snow where appropriate, is a key element of global and continental water cycle. Since 2002, the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) space gravimetry mission provides a new tool to measure large-scale TWS variations. However, for the past few decades, direct estimate of TWS variability is accessible from hydrological modeling only. Here we propose a novel approach that combines GRACE-based TWS spatial patterns with multi-decadal-long in situ river level records, to reconstruct past 2-dimensional TWS over a river basin. Results are presented for the Amazon Basin for the period 1980–2008, focusing on the interannual time scale. Results are compared with past TWS estimated by the global hydrological model ISBA-TRIP. Correlations between reconstructed past interannual TWS variability and known climate forcing modes over the region (e.g., El Niño-Southern Oscillation and Pacific Decadal Oscillation) are also estimated. This method offers new perspective for improving our knowledge of past interannual TWS in world river basins where natural climate variability (as opposed to direct anthropogenic forcing) drives TWS variations.

scholarly journals Emerging Changes in Terrestrial Water Storage Variability as a Target for Future Satellite Gravity Missions

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (23) ◽  
pp. 3898
Author(s):  
Laura Jensen ◽  
Annette Eicker ◽  
Henryk Dobslaw ◽  
Roland Pail
Keyword(s):  
Land Surface ◽  
Seasonal Cycle ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Water Cycle ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Phase Changes ◽  
Terrestrial Water Storage ◽  
Satellite Gravity ◽  
Terrestrial Water

Climate change will affect the terrestrial water cycle during the next decades by impacting the seasonal cycle, interannual variations, and long-term linear trends of water stored at or beyond the surface. Since 2002, terrestrial water storage (TWS) has been globally observed by the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and its follow-on mission (GRACE-FO). Next Generation Gravity Missions (NGGMs) are planned to extend this record in the near future. Based on a multi-model ensemble of climate model output provided by the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) covering the years 2002–2100, we assess possible changes in TWS variability with respect to present-day conditions to help defining scientific requirements for NGGMs. We find that present-day GRACE accuracies are sufficient to detect amplitude and phase changes in the seasonal cycle in a third of the land surface, whereas a five times more accurate double-pair mission could resolve such changes almost everywhere outside the most arid landscapes of our planet. We also select one individual model experiment out of the CMIP6 ensemble that closely matches both GRACE observations and the multi-model median of all CMIP6 realizations, which might serve as basis for satellite mission performance studies extending over many decades to demonstrate the suitability of NGGM satellite missions to monitor long-term climate variations in the terrestrial water cycle.

Links between global terrestrial water storage and large-scale modes of climatic variability

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiewei Li
Keyword(s):  
Land Surface ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Water Cycle ◽  
Southern Oscillation ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Climatic Variability ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Terrestrial Water Storage ◽  
Global Land ◽  
Terrestrial Water

<p>Large-scale modes of climatic variability, or teleconnections, influence global patterns of climate variability and provide a framework for understanding complex responses of the global water cycle to global climate. Here, we examine how Terrestrial Water Storage (TWS) responds to 14 major teleconnections (TCs) during the 2003–2016 period based on data obtained from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE). By examining correlations between the teleconnections and TWS anomalies (TWSA) data, we find these teleconnections significantly influence TWSA over more than 80.8% of the global land surface. The El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO), the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), and the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) are significantly correlated with TWSA variations in 55.8%，56.2% and 60% the global land surface, while other teleconnections affect TWSA at regional scales. We also explore the TCs’ effect on three key hydrological components, including precipitation (P), evapotranspiration (ET) and runoff (R), and their contribution to TWSA variations in 225 river basins. It’s found the TCs generally exert the comprehensive but not equally impact on all three components (P, ET and R). Our findings demonstrate a significant and varying effect of multiple TCs in terrestrial hydrological balance.</p>

Deep learning-based recovery of high-resolution terrestrial water storage from space-borne gravimetry and altimetry

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Irrgang ◽  
Jan Saynisch-Wagner ◽  
Robert Dill ◽  
Eva Boergens ◽  
Maik Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Satellite Altimetry ◽  
Water Cycle ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Digital Object Identifier ◽  
Terrestrial Water Storage ◽  
Network Training ◽  
The Neural Network ◽  
Terrestrial Water ◽  
Groundwater Basins

<p>Space-borne observations of terrestrial water storage (TWS) are an essential ingredient for understanding the Earth's global water cycle, its susceptibility to climate change, and for risk assessments of ecosystems, agriculture, and water management. However, the complex distribution of water masses in rivers, lakes, or groundwater basins remains elusive in coarse-resolution gravimetry observations. We combine machine learning, numerical modeling, and satellite altimetry to build and train a downscaling neural network that recovers simulated TWS from synthetic space-borne gravity observations. The neural network is designed to adapt and validate its training progress by considering independent satellite altimetry records. We show that the neural network can accurately derive TWS anomalies in 2019 after being trained over the years 2003 to 2018. Specifically for validated regions in the Amazonas, we highlight that the neural network can outperform the numerical hydrology model used in the network training.</p> <p><a class="epub-doi" href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089258" aria-label="Digital Object Identifier">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089258</a></p> <p> </p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document