Inclined load capacity of suction caissons

2003 ◽  
Vol 27 (14) ◽  
pp. 1235-1254 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. P. Aubeny ◽  
S. W. Han ◽  
J. D. Murff
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ragini Gogoi ◽  
Charles P. Aubeny ◽  
Phillip Watson ◽  
Fraser Bransby

Abstract Suction caissons have emerged as a viable solution for the foundations of offshore wind turbines, which are gaining momentum worldwide as an alternate energy source. When used in a multi-bucket jacket system, the system capacity is often governed by the uplift capacity of the windward bucket foundation. Seabed conditions at offshore windfarm sites often comprise dense sand where the soil response may be drained, partially drained or undrained depending on the loading regime, the foundation dimensions and the soil conditions. Given the large difference in uplift capacity of caissons for these different drainage conditions, predicting the behavior of a suction caisson under a range of drainage conditions becomes a paramount concern. Consequently, this paper presents the findings of a coupled finite element investigation of the monotonic uplift response of the windward caisson of a multi-bucket jacket system in a typical dense silica sand for a range of drainage conditions. The study adopts a Hypoplastic soil constitutive model capable of simulating the stress-strain-strength behavior of dense sand. This choice is justified by conducting a comparative study with other soil models — namely the Mohr Coulomb and bounding surface sand models — to determine the most efficient soil failure model to capture the complex undrained behavior of dense sand. The numerical predictions made in this study are verified by recreating the test conditions adopted in centrifuge tests previously conducted at the University of Western Australia, and demonstrating that the capacity from numerical analysis is consistent with the test results. The Hypoplastic soil constitutive model also provides an efficient method to produce accurate load capacity transition curves from an undrained to a drained soil state.


Author(s):  
Charles P. Aubeny ◽  
Seungwoon Han ◽  
J. Don Murff

Suction caissons used as mooring anchors for offshore structures can, depending on design concept, be subjected to pullout forces ranging from nearly vertical for tension leg platforms, to intermediate inclination angles for taut mooring systems, to nearly horizontal for catenary moored systems. Hence, the ability to understand and predict suction anchor pullout resistance for a full range of load orientations is becoming of increasing importance. A previous paper by the authors presents a plastic limit analysis for estimating the load capacity of suction anchors over a full range of load inclination ranging from horizontal to vertical. The model was capable of predicting load capacity for various load attachment (padeye) depths, caisson aspect ratios, and soil undrained strength profiles that vary linearly with depth. Loading conditions are assumed to be undrained; therefore, a purely cohesive soil is assumed. The original analysis assumed full adhesion on the boundaries of the caisson; i.e., a skin resistance coefficient α equal to unity. However, actual values of this coefficient are less than unity, with specific values varying according to soil conditions and the method of caisson installation. To overcome the limitation of the original model, this paper presents a modified formulation that allows a skin resistance less than unity. The modified formulation develops an interaction relationship between vertical and horizontal soil resistance on the sides of the caisson that is applicable for any skin resistance conditions ranging from no to full adhesion.


2002 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 576-584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magued Iskander ◽  
Sherif El-Gharbawy ◽  
Roy Olson

The use of suction caissons (suction piles) in marine environments has been increasing in the last decade. A suction caisson is a steel pipe with an open bottom and a closed top that is inserted into the ground by pumping water out of it. Pumping creates a differential pressure across the caisson's top that pushes it into place, thus eliminating the need for pile driving. There are a number of uncertainties in the design of suction caissons. First, the state of stress and soil conditions adjacent to a suction caisson differs from those around typical driven piles or drilled shafts. Second, the axial load capacity of suction caissons depends on the rate of loading, hydraulic conductivity, drainage length, as well as the shearing strength properties of the foundation material. Finally, during pullout, volume change characteristics of the surrounding soils may change the theoretical suction pressures. A review of the existing knowledge relating to the design and construction of suction caissons is presented in this paper along with the results of a laboratory study on model caissons in sand and clay. Test results indicate that the use of suction pressure for installation of caissons is a viable alternative to conventional methods. Suction was also shown to resist some axial tensile loads.Key words: suction, pile, bucket, foundation, anchor, capacity.


Author(s):  
Francisco L. Silva-González ◽  
Ernesto Heredia-Zavoni ◽  
Celestino Valle-Molina ◽  
Jorge Sánchez-Moreno ◽  
Robert B. Gilbert

A risk and reliability based calibration of partial safety factors for the ultimate limit state of suction caissons subjected to inclined tension loads from floating production systems is presented. The formulation is for the case of normally consolidated clay deposits with undrained loading conditions. The load capacity analysis is carried out using the plastic limit model proposed by Aubeny et al. [1–3]. A procedure to calibrate the plastic limit model based on finite element numerical results is described. Line tensions from two mooring systems of an FPSO designed for two sites in deep water at the Bay of Campeche, Gulf of Mexico, are used. A procedure to characterize probabilistically the load capacity of the caisson at mudline is presented. The physical lower limit of the load capacity and soil-chain interaction are taking into account. The mean and dynamic tensions of mooring lines are modeled through response surfaces in terms of uncertain metocean variables describing extreme sea-states. Reliability analyses are performed using FORM and considering both mooring line tensions and load capacity of the soil-caisson system at the mudline, rather than at the padeye. Partial safety factors for the design of caissons in connection to catenary and taut-leg mooring systems are calibrated separately. This is considered to be most appropriate taking into account their differences in terms of relative contributions of the mean and dynamic tension components, failure mechanisms controlling the loading capacity, and lower bound capacity. Calibration of safety factors is performed for a target reliability index equal to 4.2.


Author(s):  
Charles Aubeny ◽  
Francisco Grajales

Installation of driven piles and suction caissons in clayey soils generates excess pore pressures that temporarily reduce load capacity due to side resistance. Time dependent dissipation of these excess pore pressures leads to recovery of side resistance, a process known as ‘setup’. Since many facilities cannot be put into operation until sufficient pile load capacity has been mobilized, realistic predictions of setup time can be important. This study consists on the analysis of setup time following open ended pile and caisson installation. Initial excess pore pressures due to installation disturbance are predicted based on a strain path analysis based on a ring source moving at constant velocity in an incompressible medium. It is assumed that the setup occurs primarily due to dissipation of excess pore pressures generated during the installation process; thixotropic effects are neglected. The analysis employs an elastic perfectly plastic model of soil behavior and an uncoupled analysis of consolidation to simulate conditions on the pile shaft outside of the influence of tip effects. A parametric study shows that wall thickness and soil rigidity index can exert order of magnitude differences on setup time. Strain path solutions show reasonable agreement to laboratory and field measurements of pore pressure dissipation around thin-walled piles typical of suction caissons. Strain path solutions tend to underestimate setup time for driven piles, likely due to partial plugging during pile driving.


2021 ◽  
Vol 889 (1) ◽  
pp. 012076
Author(s):  
Chamjeet Singh ◽  
Jagdeep Singh ◽  
Sandeep Singh ◽  
Vikas Kumar

Abstract The skirt footings are considered as alternate to enhance the bearing capacity of shallow foundation on sandy soil as an alternate of deep foundation. The experimental data of paper titled “Performance of skirt strip footing subjected to eccentric inclined load was consider as base for validation and other parameters of material for numerical investigation for different conditions. Numerical analysis was conducted to determine the behavior of two-sided skirt footing on eccentric loading with different angle and projections provided to skirt. The study reveals good impact of skirt angle and skirt projection lengths on load capacity of footing system


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document