Longitudinal dynamics of body weight change in the development of type 2 diabetes

Obesity ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 1643-1649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara C. Hansen ◽  
Jennifer D. Newcomb ◽  
Ren Chen ◽  
Ellen H. Linden
Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2115-P
Author(s):  
RAN YOSHIMURA ◽  
YUKIKO HASEGAWA ◽  
TOMOKO NAKAGAMI ◽  
TETSUYA BABAZONO

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A10-A11
Author(s):  
Melanie Davies ◽  
Louise Færch ◽  
Ole K Jeppesen ◽  
Arash Pakseresht ◽  
Sue D Pedersen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: In people with overweight/obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D), achievement of weight loss can be a challenge. STEP 2 investigated the efficacy and safety of semaglutide 2.4 mg for weight management in adults with overweight/obesity and T2D. Methods: This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial was conducted at 149 sites across 12 countries (NCT03552757). Adults aged ≥18 years with body mass index (BMI) ≥27 kg/m2, T2D, HbA1c between 7–10% (53–86 mmol/mol), and receiving ≤3 oral glucose-lowering agents were randomized 1:1:1 to once-weekly subcutaneous (s.c.) semaglutide 2.4 mg or 1.0 mg, or placebo, as adjunct to a reduced-calorie diet and increased physical activity for 68 weeks. The co-primary endpoints were percentage change in body weight and proportion of participants achieving weight loss ≥5% for semaglutide 2.4 mg vs placebo. Cardiovascular risk factors, glycemia and safety/tolerability were also assessed. Two estimands were defined: treatment policy and trial product; results are presented for the treatment policy estimand, unless stated otherwise. Results: 1,210 participants (mean: age 55 years, body weight 99.8 kg, BMI 35.7 kg/m2, HbA1c 8.1%, diabetes duration 8.0 years; 50.9% female) were randomized. Mean body weight change from baseline to week 68 was −9.6% with semaglutide 2.4 mg vs −3.4% with placebo (estimated treatment difference [ETD]: −6.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: −7.3, −5.2; p<0.0001) and −7.0% for semaglutide 1.0 mg (ETD for semaglutide 2.4 mg vs 1.0 mg: −2.7%; 95% CI: −3.7, −1.6; p<0.0001). Similar results were obtained with the trial product estimand: mean body weight change −10.6% for semaglutide 2.4 mg vs −3.1% for placebo (ETD: −7.6%; 95% CI: −8.6, −6.6; p<0.0001) and 7.6% for semaglutide 1.0 mg (ETD vs semaglutide 2.4 mg: −3.1%; 95% CI: −4.1, −2.1; p<0.0001). Participants on semaglutide 2.4 mg were more likely to achieve weight loss ≥5%, ≥10%, ≥15% and ≥20% vs placebo (68.8% vs 28.5%, 45.6% vs 8.2%, 25.8% vs 3.2% and 13.1% vs 1.6%, respectively; p value for odds ratios <0.0001 for all). Mean change in HbA1c from baseline to week 68 was −1.6% for semaglutide 2.4 mg vs −0.4% for placebo (p<0.0001). Greater improvements with semaglutide 2.4 mg vs placebo were also seen in waist circumference, BMI, systolic blood pressure, fasting plasma glucose, C-reactive protein, and lipids (HDL, VLDL, free fatty acids, and triglycerides) (p<0.05 for all). The most frequent adverse events were gastrointestinal disorders (typically transient and mild-to-moderate), occurring in 57.5%, 63.5% and 34.3% of participants receiving semaglutide 1.0 mg, 2.4 mg and placebo, respectively. Conclusion: Semaglutide 2.4 mg, as adjunct to lifestyle intervention, was efficacious and well tolerated for weight management in adults with overweight or obesity and T2D, providing significantly greater weight loss vs placebo and semaglutide 1.0 mg at week 68.


Epidemiology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 778-779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoru Kodama ◽  
Chika Horikawa ◽  
Sakiko Yoshizawa ◽  
Kazuya Fujihara ◽  
Yoko Yachi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinbo Hu ◽  
Yang Hu ◽  
Ellen Hertzmark ◽  
Chen Yuan ◽  
Gang Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Whether weight change around type 2 diabetes (T2D) diagnosis is associated with long-term survival is unclear. We aimed to examine the association between weight change and mortality among participants with incident T2D and evaluate impacts of lifestyle on this association. Methods: This prospective analysis included 11,262 incident T2D patients from the Nurses’ Health Study and Health Professionals Follow-up Study. We assessed weight change bracketing T2D diagnosis in relation to mortality. We also examined potential effect modification by a healthy lifestyle consisting of high-quality diet, regular physical activity, non-smoking status and moderate alcohol consumption.Results: On average, T2D patients lost 2.3 kg during a two-year time-window spanning the T2D diagnosis, and body weight increased afterwards. Compared with patients with a stable weight, T2D patients who lost ≥10% body weight had a 26% (95% CI: 4%, 52%) increased mortality due to cardiovascular disease (CVD). Lifestyle significantly modified these associations: the hazard ratios (95% CIs) of CVD mortality comparing ≥10% weight loss with stable weight were 1.41 (0.87, 2.30) among participants with a deteriorated lifestyle, 1.46 (1.15, 1.86) for a stable lifestyle, and 0.82 (0.53, 1.27) for an improved lifestyle (Pinteraction <0.001). Major weight loss was also associated with an increased all-cause mortality, and similar effect modifications by lifestyle were observed.Conclusions: Significant weight loss upon T2D incidence was associated with an increased CVD mortality, although improved lifestyle quality abolished these associations. These results highlight the role of adopting a healthy lifestyle for newly diagnosed T2D patients in improving long-term survival.


Author(s):  
Jinbo Hu ◽  
Yang Hu ◽  
Ellen Hertzmark ◽  
Chen Yuan ◽  
Gang Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective To examine the association between weight change and mortality among participants with incident type 2 diabetes (T2D) and evaluate the impact of adopting a healthy lifestyle on this association. Research Design and Methods This prospective analysis included 11,262 incident T2D patients from the Nurses’ Health Study and Health Professionals Follow-up Study. We assessed weight change bracketing T2D diagnosis in relation to mortality. We also examined potential effect modification by a healthy lifestyle consisting of high-quality diet, regular physical activity, non-smoking status and moderate alcohol consumption. Results On average, T2D patients lost 2.3 kg during a two-year time-window spanning the T2D diagnosis, and body weight increased afterwards following a trajectory similar to that of non-diabetics. Compared with patients with a stable weight, T2D patients who lost ≥10% body weight had a 21% (95% CI: 9%, 35%) increased all-cause mortality. Lifestyle significantly modified these associations: the hazard ratios (95% CIs) of all-cause mortality comparing ≥10% weight loss with stable weight were 1.63 (1.26, 2.09) among participants with a deteriorated lifestyle, 1.27 (1.11, 1.46) for a stable lifestyle, and 1.02 (0.81, 1.27) for an improved lifestyle (Pinteraction &lt;0.001). Major weight loss was associated with increased cause-specific mortality and similar effect modifications by lifestyle were also observed. Conclusions Significant weight loss upon T2D incidence was associated with increased mortality, although improved lifestyle quality abolished these associations. These results highlight the role of adopting a healthy lifestyle for newly diagnosed T2D patients, especially among those who might lose weight unintentionally, and improving long-term survival.


Author(s):  
Thomas G Wadsworth ◽  
Glenda G Carr ◽  
Karl Madaras-Kelly ◽  
Richard Remington ◽  
Justin Bell

Abstract Purpose In comparative randomized studies, use of insulin detemir has been consistently demonstrated to be associated with less weight gain than the industry standard, insulin glargine. However, the magnitude of the relative reduction in weight gain with use of insulin determir vs insulin glargine in regulatory studies (reported values ranged from 0.77 kg to 3.6 kg) may not be generalizable to patients in real-world practice conditions. A study was conducted to substantiate detemir’s purported weight-sparing advantage over insulin glargine in newly treated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus under the conditions found in a clinical practice setting. Methods A retrospective longitudinal cohort study design was applied in reviewing electronic medical records to identify insulin-naive, overweight patients with type 2 diabetes who received insulin detemir or insulin glargine therapy continued for up to 1 year. Patient weights at baseline and at each subsequent clinic visit after treatment initiation were identified. The primary outcome was the maximum weight increase from baseline after exposure to insulin detemir or glargine. The difference-in-differences (DiD) mean total body weight change was tested by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Results One hundred nine patient records (56 of patients who received insulin glargine and 53 of patients who received insulin detemir) met study criteria and underwent full abstraction. The covariate-adjusted estimated mean change in body weight associated with use of insulin detemir vs insulin glargine was –1.5 kg (95% CI, –2.89 to –0.12 kg; P = 0.04). Conclusion The mean weight gain associated with detemir use was significantly less than the mean weight change observed with glargine use. The magnitude of weight change was consistent with that demonstrated in randomized controlled trials. These results further substantiate detemir’s purported comparative weight-sparing properties under conditions found in a real-world practice setting.


2006 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. 208-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Astrup

The epidemic of both obesity and type 2 diabetes is due to environmental factors, but the individuals developing the conditions possess a strong genetic predisposition. Observational surveys and intervention studies have shown that excess body fatness is the major environmental cause of type 2 diabetes, and that even a minor weight loss can prevent its development in high-risk subjects. Maintenance of a healthy body weight in susceptible individuals requires 45–60 minutes physical activity daily, a fat-reduced diet with plenty of fruit, vegetables, whole grain, and lean meat and dairy products, and moderate consumption of calorie containing beverages. The use of table values to predict the glycemic index of meals is of little – if any – value, and the role of a low-glycemic index diet for body weight control is controversial. The replacement of starchy carbohydrates with protein from lean meat and lean dairy products enhances satiety, and facilitate weight control. It is possible that dairy calcium also promotes weight loss, although the mechanism of action remains unclear. A weight loss of 5–10% can be induced in almost all obese patients providing treatment is offered by a professional team consisting of a physician and dieticians or nurses trained to focus on weight loss and maintenance. Whereas increasing daily physical activity and regular exercise does not significantly effect the rate of weight loss in the induction phase, it plays an important role in the weight maintenance phase due to an impact on daily energy expenditure and also to a direct enhancement of insulin sensitivity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document