Automatic oxygen flow titration in spontaneously breathing children: An open‐label randomized controlled pilot study

2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (11) ◽  
pp. 3180-3188
Author(s):  
Jean‐Michel Roué ◽  
Juliette Delpeut ◽  
Alix d‘Hennezel ◽  
Tess Tierrie ◽  
Audrey Barzic ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Manal El-Hamamsy ◽  
Hesham Elwakil ◽  
Amr S. Saad ◽  
May A. Shawki

Statins have been reported to have a potential radiosensitizing effect that has not been evaluated in clinical trials. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of simvastatin in addition to whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) in patients with brain metastases (BM). A prospective randomized, controlled, open-label pilot study was conducted on 50 Egyptian patients with BM who were randomly assigned to receive 30-Gy WBRT (control group: 25 patients) or 30 Gy WBRT + simvastatin 80 mg/day for the WBRT period (simvastatin group: 25 patients). The primary outcome was radiological response at 4 weeks after WBRT. Secondary outcomes were 1-year progression-free survival (PFS), 1-year overall survival (OS), and health-related quality of life (HRQL) that was assessed using the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and its brain module (BN-20), at baseline, after WBRT, and 4 weeks after WBRT. The addition of simvastatin was tolerated. Twenty-one patients were not evaluated for radiological response because of death (n = 16), noncompliance to follow-up (n = 4), and clinical deterioration (n = 1). Response rates were 60% and 78.6% (p = 0.427), 1-year PFS rates were 5.2% and 17.7% (p = 0.392), and 1-year OS rates were 12% and 8% (p = 0.880) for the control group and simvastatin group, respectively. Nonsignificant differences were found between the two arms regarding HRQL scales. The addition of simvastatin 80 mg/day did not improve the clinical outcomes of patients with BM receiving WBRT.


Author(s):  
Marta Majoli ◽  
Laura Costanza De Angelis ◽  
Monica Panella ◽  
Maria Grazia Calevo ◽  
Simona Serveli ◽  
...  

Objective The study aimed to assess whether there was any difference in the transition time to full oral feedings between parent-administered and professional-administered premature infant oral motor intervention (PIOMI). The study also evaluated parental satisfaction with performing the intervention through an open-ended questionnaire. Study Design A single-center, randomized, controlled, open-label pilot study was carried on between March 2017 and May 2019. A total of 39 infants born ≤32 weeks' gestation were randomly assigned to either parent-performed or professionally performed oral stimulation. The oral stimulation was performed once a day for seven consecutive days between 31 and 32 weeks' postmenstrual age. Results There was no statistically significant difference in transition time, weight gain, or length of hospital stay between the two groups. No adverse events were observed. Parents' satisfaction was high, and their active involvement enhanced their perception of adequacy to care for their infant. Conclusion Following adequate training, a parent-administered PIOMI may be considered in preterm infants to reduce the transition time to full oral feeding and enhance the direct involvement of parents in neonatal care. Key Points


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1096-1102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting Li ◽  
Laifang Sun ◽  
Wenwu Zhang ◽  
Chanfan Zheng ◽  
Chenchen Jiang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document