Robotic-assisted gynaecological surgery—establishing training criteria; minimizing operative time and blood loss

2008 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael C. Pitter ◽  
Patrick Anderson ◽  
Amelia Blissett ◽  
Nicola Pemberton
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Gynaecological Surgery ◽  
Robotic Assisted

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in obese patients: The Columbia University experience

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14619-14619
Author(s):  
A. W. Levinson ◽  
D. B. Samadi ◽  
S. M. Collins ◽  
A. E. Urdaneta ◽  
E. T. Goluboff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Obese Patients ◽  
Columbia University ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Laparoscopic Prostatectomy ◽  
Trocar Placement ◽  
Significant Difference

14619 Background: In addition to being more likely to be found with more aggressive prostate cancer (PCa), obese patients (OPs) face challenges with treatment options for localized PCa. Several studies have shown that open radical retropubic prostatectomy, pure laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) may be associated with increased operative times, blood loss, and even a higher rate of capsular incision. We examined our own experience with the surgical and pathologic outcomes of OPs undergoing transperitoneal RALP at our institution. Methods: We queried the Columbia University IRB approved database for transperitoneal RALPs performed by a single fellowship trained laparoscopic oncologist (DS) for which body mass index (BMI) data was available. We identified patients who met the CDC definition of obese (BMI > or = 30 kg/m2) at the time of surgery. We compared surgical and pathologic outcomes between these OPs and NOPs. Of note, operative time was defined as the time from initial trocar placement to skin closure, and does not include robotic set-up time. Results: BMI data was available for 78% of RALP patients in the database. We identified 22 OPs (mean BMI 32.7 (30.1 to 46.7)) and 112 NOPs (mean BMI 25.6). One patient in each group was converted to open. There were no statistically significant differences in the surgical outcomes of mean blood loss, operative time or length of stay for the OPs vs. NOPs (179cc v. 191cc, 213min v. 221min, and 1.4d vs. 1.7d, respectively). There was no significant difference in preoperative PSA, pre-treatment MSKCC 5yr progression-free probability, pre or post-operative Gleason sum, margin status, or perioperative complications. There was a trend towards increased prostatic volume in OPs vs NOPs (51cc vs 44cc, p = 0.10). Conclusions: Unlike a prior robotic, pure laparoscopic and ORRP series, OPs who received transperitoneal RALP at our institution had no statistically significant increases in blood loss, operative time or perioperative complications when compared to their non-obese cohorts. We believe RALPs may be safely recommended to OPs as an option for treatment of localized prostate cancer. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Rate of Post-Operative Pancreatic Fistula after Robotic-Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy with Pancreato-Jejunostomy versus Pancreato-Gastrostomy: A Retrospective Case Matched Comparative Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 2181
Author(s):  
Marco V. Marino ◽  
Adrian Kah Heng Heng Chiow ◽  
Antonello Mirabella ◽  
Gianpaolo Vaccarella ◽  
Andrzej L. Komorowski
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Pancreatic Fistula ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Pancreatic Anastomosis ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss

Background: Different techniques of pancreatic anastomosis have been described, with inconclusive results in terms of pancreatic fistula reduction. Studies comparing robotic pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) and pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) are scarcely reported. Methods: The present study analyzes the outcomes of two case-matched groups of patients who underwent PG (n = 20) or PJ (n = 40) after pancreaticoduodenectomy. The primary aim was to compare the rate of post-operative pancreatic fistula. Results: Operative time (375 vs. 315 min, p = 0.34), estimated blood loss (270 vs. 295 mL, p = 0.44), and rate of clinically relevant post-operative pancreatic fistula (12.5% vs. 10%, p = 0.82) were similar between the two groups. PJ was associated with a higher rate of intra-abdominal collections (7.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.002), but lower post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (2.5% vs. 10%, p = 0.003). PG was associated with a lower rate of post-operative pancreatic fistula (POPF) (33.3% vs. 50%, p = 0.003) in the high-risk group of patients. Conclusions: The outcomes of post-operative pancreatic fistula are comparable between the two reconstruction techniques. PG may have a lower incidence of POPF in patients with high-risk of pancreatic fistula.

scholarly journals Comparison of Trifecta Outcome Among Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy in Patients With Small Renal Masses: 10-Year Experience in Ramathibodi Hospital

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaichant Soisrithong ◽  
Wit Viseshsindh ◽  
Wisoot Kongchareonsombat ◽  
Charoen Leenanupunth ◽  
Wachira Kochakarn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Small Renal Masses ◽  
Renal Masses ◽  
Intraoperative Complication ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Robotic Assisted Partial Nephrectomy

Abstract Purpose: To compare the trifecta outcome and perioperative and postoperative outcomes among open partial nephrectomy (OPN), laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN), and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in patients with small renal masses in Ramathibodi Hospital.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 141 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy from January 2009 to December 2018. The baseline characteristics and preoperative outcomes were compared among the three surgical approaches. Results: Among the 141 patients, 42 (29.79%), 29 (20.57%), and 70 (49.64%) patients underwent OPN, LPN, and RAPN, respectively. Among 116 patients with available data, 71 achieved the trifecta outcome [18 (56.25%), 14 (56.00%), and 39 (73.58%) in the OPN, LPN, and RAPN group, respectively; p=0.276]. The rate of conversion to OPN was higher in the LPN than RAPN group. The number of patients who received intraoperative packed red cells was lowest in the RAPN group. The estimated blood loss was significantly lower in the LPN group than OPN and RAPN groups (p=0.041). The operative time was shorter in the OPN group than LPN and RAPN groups (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that the intraoperative complication rate was a predictive factor for trifecta outcome achievement.Conclusion: OPN had the shortest operative time. LPN had the highest rate of conversion to OPN and lowest estimated blood loss. The number of patients who received intraoperative packed red cells was lowest in the RAPN group. However, achievement of the trifecta outcome was not significantly different among the three groups. The predictive factor for trifecta outcome achievement was the intraoperative complication rate.

scholarly journals Mini-invasive robotic assisted pyelolithotomy: Comparison between the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approach

2019 ◽  
Vol 91 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele D'Agostino ◽  
Paolo Corsi ◽  
Marco Giampaoli ◽  
Federico Mineo Bianchi ◽  
Daniele Romagnoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Retroperitoneal Approach ◽  
Transperitoneal Approach ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Free Rate

Objective: To compare the retroperitoneal with the transperitoneal approach in a series of patients underwent to robotic-assisted pyelolithotomy (RP). Materials and methods: From January 2015 to December 2018 we evaluated 20 patients subjected to robotic pyelolithotomy; 11 patients were treated with retroperitoneal approach (RRP) and 9 with transperitoneal approach (TRP). For each patient intra and perioperative data were recorded: operative time (OT), blood loss (BL), length of hospital stay (LOS), stone clearance, post-operative complications and time to remove the drain. The presence of stone fragments < 4 mm was considered as stone free rate. Results: The principal stone burden was greater in the TRP group than in the RRP group (48 ± 10 mm vs 32 ± 14 mm, p = 0.12). Preoperative hydronephrosis was present in 7 (64%) patients in RRP group and a mild hydronephrosis in 3 of TRP group (p = 0.04). The average operative time was higher in the RRP group than in the TRP group (203 ± 45 min vs 137 ± 31 min, p = 0.002). The average blood loss was 305 ± 175 ml in the RRP group versus 94 ± 104 ml in the TRP group (p = 0.005). The stone free rate was similar between the two groups, 36% (4 patients) in the RRP group and 44% (4 patients) in the TRP (p = 0.966). Conclusions: RP appears to be a safe and effective minimally invasive treatment for some patients with renal staghorn calculi or urinary tract malformations. The TRP may give lower operative time and better results in terms of blood loss and length of hospital stay.

Double-blind, randomized controlled trial of tranexamic acid in minor lumbar spine surgery: no effect on operative time, intraoperative blood loss, or complications

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 194-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Signe Elmose ◽  
Mikkel Ø. Andersen ◽  
Else Bay Andresen ◽  
Leah Yacat Carreon
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Tranexamic Acid ◽  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Decompressive Surgery ◽  
Lumbar Spine Surgery ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Double Blind

OBJECTIVEThe purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of tranexamic acid (TXA) compared to placebo in low-risk adult patients undergoing elective minor lumbar spine surgery—specifically with respect to operative time, estimated blood loss, and complications. Studies have shown that TXA reduces blood loss during major spine surgery. There have been no previous studies on the effect of TXA in minor lumbar spine surgery in which these variables have been evaluated.METHODSThe authors enrolled patients with ASA grades 1 to 2 scheduled to undergo lumbar decompressive surgery at Middelfart Hospital into a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Patients with thromboembolic disease, coagulopathy, hypersensitivity to TXA, or a history of convulsion were excluded. Patients were randomly assigned, in blocks of 10, to one of 2 groups, TXA or placebo. Anticoagulation therapy was discontinued 2–7 days preoperatively. Prior to the incision, patients received either a bolus of TXA (10 mg/kg) or an equivalent volume of saline solution (placebo). Independent t-tests were used to compare differences between the 2 groups, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.RESULTSOf the 250 patients enrolled, 17 patients were excluded, leaving 233 cases for analysis (117 in the TXA group and 116 in the placebo group). The demographics of the 2 groups were similar, except for a higher proportion of women in the TXA group (TXA 50% vs placebo 32%, p = 0.017). There was no significant between-groups difference in operative time (49.53 ± 18.26 vs 54.74 ± 24.49 minutes for TXA and placebo, respectively; p = 0.108) or intraoperative blood loss (55.87 ± 48.48 vs 69.14 ± 83.47 ml for TXA and placebo, respectively; p = 0.702). Postoperative blood loss measured from drain output was 62% significantly lower in the TXA group (13.03 ± 21.82 ml) than in the placebo group (34.61 ± 44.38 ml) (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in number of dural lesions or postoperative spinal epidural hematomas, and there were no thromboembolic events.CONCLUSIONSTranexamic acid did not have a statistically significant effect on operative time, intraoperative blood loss, or complications. This study gives no evidence to support the routine use of TXA during minor lumbar decompressive surgery.Clinical trial registration no.: NCT03714360 (clinicaltrials.gov)

The impact of surgeon experience on perioperative complications and operative measures following thoracolumbar 3-column osteotomy for adult spinal deformity: overcoming the learning curve

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darryl Lau ◽  
Vedat Deviren ◽  
Christopher P. Ames
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Surgical Complication ◽  
Perioperative Complications ◽  
Adult Spinal Deformity ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Years Of Experience ◽  
Surgeon Experience ◽  
Operative Measures

OBJECTIVEPosterior-based thoracolumbar 3-column osteotomy (3CO) is a formidable surgical procedure. Surgeon experience and case volume are known factors that influence surgical complication rates, but these factors have not been studied well in cases of adult spinal deformity (ASD). This study examines how surgeon experience affects perioperative complications and operative measures following thoracolumbar 3CO in ASD.METHODSA retrospective study was performed of a consecutive cohort of thoracolumbar ASD patients who underwent 3CO performed by the senior authors from 2006 to 2018. Multivariate analysis was used to assess whether experience (years of experience and/or number of procedures) is associated with perioperative complications, operative duration, and blood loss.RESULTSA total of 362 patients underwent 66 vertebral column resections (VCRs) and 296 pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSOs). The overall complication rate was 29.4%, and the surgical complication rate was 8.0%. The rate of postoperative neurological deficits was 6.2%. There was a trend toward lower overall complication rates with greater operative years of experience (from 44.4% to 28.0%) (p = 0.115). Years of operative experience was associated with a significantly lower rate of neurological deficits (p = 0.027); the incidence dropped from 22.2% to 4.0%. The mean operative time was 310.7 minutes overall. Both increased years of experience and higher case numbers were significantly associated with shorter operative times (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). Only operative years of experience was independently associated with operative times (p < 0.001): 358.3 minutes from 2006 to 2008 to 275.5 minutes in 2018 (82.8 minutes shorter). Over time, there was less deviation and more consistency in operative times, despite the implementation of various interventions to promote fusion and prevent construct failure: utilization of multiple-rod constructs (standard, satellite, and nested rods), bone morphogenetic protein, vertebroplasty, and ligament augmentation. Of note, the use of tranexamic acid did not significantly lower blood loss.CONCLUSIONSSurgeon years of experience, rather than number of 3COs performed, was a significant factor in mitigating neurological complications and improving quality measures following thoracolumbar 3CO for ASD. The 3- to 5-year experience mark was when the senior surgeon overcame a learning curve and was able to minimize neurological complication rates. There was a continuous decrease in operative time as the surgeon’s experience increased; this was in concurrence with the implementation of additional preventative surgical interventions. Ongoing practice changes should be implemented and can be done safely, but it is imperative to self-assess the risks and benefits of those practice changes.

scholarly journals Nonstructural bone graft for single-segment lumbar tuberculosis: surgical indications, clinical efficacy, and preliminary experiences in 34 patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 030006052098278
Author(s):  
Xing Du ◽  
Yunsheng Ou ◽  
Guanyin Jiang ◽  
Yong Zhu ◽  
Wei Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Bone Graft ◽  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Bone Grafts ◽  
Surgical Indications ◽  
Operative Blood Loss ◽  
The Mean

Objective This study was performed to evaluate the surgical indications, clinical efficacy, and preliminary experiences of nonstructural bone grafts for lumbar tuberculosis (TB). Methods Thirty-four patients with lumbar TB who were treated with nonstructural bone grafts were retrospectively assessed. The operative time, operative blood loss, hospital stay, bone graft fusion time, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration, visual analog scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment grade, and Cobb angle were recorded and analyzed. Results The mean operative time, operative blood loss, hospital stay, Cobb angle correction, and Cobb angle loss were 192.59 ± 42.16 minutes, 385.29 ± 251.82 mL, 14.91 ± 5.06 days, 9.02° ± 3.16°, and 5.54° ± 1.09°, respectively. During the mean follow-up of 27.53 ± 8.90 months, significant improvements were observed in the ESR, CRP concentration, VAS score, ODI, and ASIA grade. The mean bone graft fusion time was 5.15 ± 1.13 months. Three complications occurred, and all were cured after active treatment. Conclusions Nonstructural bone grafts may achieve satisfactory clinical efficacy for appropriately selected patients with lumbar TB.

scholarly journals Safety and effectiveness evaluation of a two-handed technique combining harmonic scalpel and laparoscopic Peng’s multifunction operative dissector in laparoscopic hemihepatectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingwei Cai ◽  
Guixing Jiang ◽  
Yuelong Liang ◽  
Yangyang Xie ◽  
Junhao Zheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Harmonic Scalpel ◽  
Peak Level ◽  
Bile Leakage ◽  
Liver Parenchyma ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Case Group ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
And Control

Abstract Objectives This study was designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a two-hand technique combining harmonic scalpel (HS) and laparoscopic Peng’s multifunction operative dissector (LPMOD) in patients who underwent laparoscopic hemihepatectomy (LHH). Methods We designed and conducted a case-control study nested in a prospectively collected laparoscopic liver surgery database. Patients who underwent LHH for liver parenchyma transection using HS + LPMOD were defined as cases (n = 98) and LPMOD only as controls (n = 47) from January 2016 to May 2018. Propensity score matching (1:1) between the case and control groups was used in the analyses. Results The case group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss in milliliters (169.4 ± 133.5 vs. 221.5 ± 176.3, P = 0.03) and shorter operative time in minutes (210.5 ± 56.1 vs. 265.7 ± 67.1, P = 0.02) comparing to the control group. The conversion to laparotomy, postoperative hospital stay, resection margin, the mean peak level of postoperative liver function parameters, bile leakage rate, and others were comparable between the two groups. There was no perioperative mortality. Conclusions We demonstrated that the two-handed technique combing HS and LPMOD in LHH is safe and effective which is associated with shorter operative time and less intraoperative blood loss compared with LPMOD alone. The technique facilitates laparoscopic liver resection and is recommended for use.

scholarly journals A comparison of the Thunderbeat and standard electrocautery devices in head and neck surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. C. Kuipers ◽  
B. J. de Kleijn ◽  
J. Wedman ◽  
B. F. A. M. van der Laan ◽  
B. E. C. Plaat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck Surgery ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Standard Instrumentation

Abstract Purpose New energy-based sutureless vessel ligation devices, such as the Thunderbeat (Olympus Medical Systems Corp., Tokyo, Japan), could reduce operative time and limit blood loss in head and neck surgery; however, efficacy and safety in major head and neck surgery have not been investigated in a prospective, randomized study. Methods This prospective, double-arm, randomized controlled trial consisted of two parts: total laryngectomy (TL) and neck dissection (ND). Thirty patients planned for TL were randomized in two groups. For the ND part, forty-two operative sides were likewise randomized. In both parts, Thunderbeat was used in addition to the standard instrumentation in the intervention groups, while only standard instrumentation was used in the control groups. Primary outcome values were blood loss, operative time and complication rate. Results For the TL part there was no difference in mean blood loss (p = 0.062), operative time (p = 0.512) and complications (p = 0.662) between both hemostatic techniques. For the neck dissection part, there was a reduction in blood loss (mean 210 mL versus 431 mL, p = 0.046) and in operative time (median 101 (IQR 85–130) minutes versus 150 (IQR 130–199) minutes, p = 0.014) when Thunderbeat was used. There was no difference in complication rate between both hemostatic systems (p = 0.261). Conclusion The Thunderbeat hemostatic device significantly reduces operative blood loss and operative time for neck dissections, without increase in complications. In TL, blood loss using Thunderbeat was comparable with the standard technique, but the operative time tended to be shorter. Trial registration UMCG Research Register, Reg. no. 201700041, date of registration: 18/1/2017

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document