P-32: Aftereffect of Viewing Concave Curved Displays: Assessment of Individual Differences in Equilibrioception Performance and Effects of Viewing Angle

2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 1315-1318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiromaru Nakagawa ◽  
Shoko Hira ◽  
Sakuichi Ohtsuka ◽  
Ken Kihara
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Viewing Angle ◽  
Curved Displays

scholarly journals Viewing angle measurements on curved displays

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 207-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Boher ◽  
T. Leroux ◽  
V. Collomb Patton ◽  
T. Bignon ◽  
P. Blanc
Keyword(s):  
Viewing Angle ◽  
Angle Measurements ◽  
Curved Displays

scholarly journals Immersiveness and Perceptibility of Convex and Concave Displays

2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 396-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Chignell ◽  
Henrique Matulis ◽  
Bella Zhang ◽  
Jacqueline Urakami ◽  
Shio Miyafuji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Virtual Reality ◽  
Individual Differences ◽  
The Other ◽  
Large Display ◽  
The Future ◽  
Binary Choices ◽  
Small Display ◽  
Design Guidance ◽  
Optimal Type ◽  
Curved Displays

Curved displays promote three-dimensionality and may facilitate non-wearable virtual reality. Yet there is little design guidance on the optimal type of curvature that should be used. In this paper we have examined the perceived properties of convex and concave displays, at two different sizes. We conducted an experiment with 21 participants. Each participant was asked to make a series of binary choices after the participant viewed a display where one side was seen as convex and the opposite side was seen as concave. For each of 15 perceptual and aesthetic features, participants had to choose whether the convex or concave view/side of the display was stronger/more appropriate. Each participant made two binary choices (one for a small display viewed from its convex and concave sides, the other for a large display viewed from its convex and concave sides) for each perceptual and aesthetic feature, leading to a total of 30 judgments. Participants preferred the convex version of the small sized display and the concave version of the larger display. Individual differences were observed. Some participants generally preferred the convex displays, while others preferred the concave displays. The results are interpreted in terms of their implications for the future use of convex and concave displays in VR applications that do not use goggles.

42.4: How to Perform Viewing Angle Measurements on Curved Displays

2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 641-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Boher ◽  
Thierry Leroux ◽  
Thibault Bignon ◽  
Véronique Collomb-Patton ◽  
Pierre Blanc
Keyword(s):  
Viewing Angle ◽  
Angle Measurements ◽  
Curved Displays

The challenge of accounting for individual differences in folk-economic beliefs

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin C. Ruisch ◽  
Rajen A. Anderson ◽  
David A. Pizarro
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Individual Variation ◽  
Political Ideologies ◽  
Economic Beliefs ◽  
Existing Data

AbstractWe argue that existing data on folk-economic beliefs (FEBs) present challenges to Boyer & Petersen's model. Specifically, the widespread individual variation in endorsement of FEBs casts doubt on the claim that humans are evolutionarily predisposed towards particular economic beliefs. Additionally, the authors' model cannot account for the systematic covariance between certain FEBs, such as those observed in distinct political ideologies.

Individual differences, social attention, and the history of the social motivation hypotheses of autism

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter C. Mundy
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Early Development ◽  
Emotional Development ◽  
Social Motivation ◽  
Social Attention ◽  
Social Emotional Development ◽  
Social Emotional ◽  
Precise Understanding ◽  
The Social ◽  
History Of

Abstract The stereotype of people with autism as unresponsive or uninterested in other people was prominent in the 1980s. However, this view of autism has steadily given way to recognition of important individual differences in the social-emotional development of affected people and a more precise understanding of the possible role social motivation has in their early development.

Elaborating the role of reflection and individual differences in the study of folk-economic beliefs

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Arceneaux
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Individual Differences ◽  
Cognitive Processes ◽  
Evolutionary History ◽  
Behavioral Responses ◽  
History Of ◽  
Economic Beliefs

AbstractIntuitions guide decision-making, and looking to the evolutionary history of humans illuminates why some behavioral responses are more intuitive than others. Yet a place remains for cognitive processes to second-guess intuitive responses – that is, to be reflective – and individual differences abound in automatic, intuitive processing as well.

Inter-individual variation shapes the human microbiome

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily F. Wissel ◽  
Leigh K. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Individual Variation ◽  
Human Microbiome ◽  
Individual Variability ◽  
Microbiota Composition ◽  
Target Article ◽  
Microbiome Research

Abstract The target article suggests inter-individual variability is a weakness of microbiota-gut-brain (MGB) research, but we discuss why it is actually a strength. We comment on how accounting for individual differences can help researchers systematically understand the observed variance in microbiota composition, interpret null findings, and potentially improve the efficacy of therapeutic treatments in future clinical microbiome research.

Why Speech-Language Clinicians Should Be in the Classroom

1991 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 277-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon L. Wadle
Keyword(s):  
Individual Differences ◽  
Task Analysis ◽  
Regular Classroom ◽  
Classroom Setting ◽  
Therapy Room

Lack of training is only an excuse for not collaborating outside of the therapy room. With our present training, speech-language clinicians have many skills to share in the regular classroom setting. This training has provided skills in task analysis, a language focus, an appreciation and awareness of individual differences in learning, and motivational techniques.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document