Career phases and their influence on faculty motivation

1982 ◽  
Vol 1982 (10) ◽  
pp. 95-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert T. Blackburn
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Daumiller ◽  
Stefan Janke ◽  
Raven Rinas ◽  
Oliver Dickhäuser ◽  
Markus Dresel

Previous research has successfully used basic psychological need and achievement goal ap-proaches for describing the motivations of university faculty for teaching and for explaining differences in faculty experiences, success, and learning. However, the interplay between these motivational constructs has been largely ignored, with only faculty from specific educational contexts being studied—neglecting those from other higher education systems and institution types that potentially differ in the configurations, levels, and effects of their motivations. As combining both approaches and examining multiple educational contexts is essential for a comprehensive theoretical understanding of faculty motivation and generalizable results, we conducted an international study including 1,410 university faculty members from German, In-dian, and US-American teaching and research universities. Aside from need satisfaction and achievement goals, we measured their positive affect, teaching quality, and professional learn-ing. Results attested measurement invariance of basic need and achievement goal scales regard-ing language, higher education context, and institution type. We found small differences in mo-tivations between the three higher education contexts and negligible differences between institu-tion types. Task, learning, and relational goals were positively, and work avoidance goals were negatively linked to the outcome variables. Need satisfaction sensibly explained differences in pursuit of these goals, and—directly and indirectly through the goals—also the outcome varia-bles. Taken together, these results provide international evidence for the importance of faculty motivation for teaching and illuminate how need satisfaction is relevant for goal pursuit, while both motivation approaches uniquely matter for faculty experiences, success, and learning.


Author(s):  
Neeta Baporikar

It is often observed that some institutions though better endowed in terms of, the management, leadership style, qualification and experience of the faculty and staff, the availability of material resources, yet do not fare well as compared to those where there exists motivated faculty. This is because motivated faculty can drive excellence in institutions though quality teaching and research. Management Educational institutions are no exception. Management education has undergone radical changes in last few decades. The content, instructional methodologies and facilities are among the key indicators of change as is the background and motivation of people who choose to become management teachers. Moreover, in the light of higher education becoming more complex and institutions becoming social undertakings globally, what is it about teaching management education that makes outstanding teachers love their jobs? The chapter delves into these issues and focuses on faculty motivation in management education.


1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 11-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawson R. Hancock

The need persists for a model that adequately addresses faculty motivations and concerns about involvement in student academic advisement. Recently, some researchers have suggested that a version of expectancy theory may be the necessary model. Expectancy theory states that people are purposeful beings who behave in accordance with their expectations and who believe that their efforts will result in outcomes they value. According to the theory, the amount of effort an individual will exert ultimately depends on three factors: a) expectancy—a person's estimation of the likelihood of successfully performing a particular behavior; b) instrumentality—a person's estimation of the likelihood that a particular behavior will result in certain outcomes; and c) valence—the positive or negative value that a person places on each of those outcomes. Attempts to identify the educational environments conducive to the use of expectancy theory to address faculty motivation in academic advisement are presented.


2014 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. 302-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Holly M. Matusovich ◽  
Marie C. Paretti ◽  
Lisa D. McNair ◽  
Cory Hixson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document