Effects of restrictive harvest criteria on antler size of hunter‐harvested male white‐tailed deer and hunter opportunity

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-221
Author(s):  
William D. Gulsby ◽  
Charlie H. Killmaster ◽  
John W. Bowers ◽  
Karl V. Miller
Keyword(s):  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Smolko ◽  
Peter Garaj ◽  
Tibor Lebocký ◽  
Ľubomír Bútora ◽  
Tibor Pataky ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-23
Author(s):  
Jan Kavan ◽  
Veronika Anděrová

AbstractA new non-invasive method based on picture analysis was used to estimate the conditions in Svalbard reindeer populations. The well-being of an individual subject is often expressed through visual indices. Two distinct reindeer populations were compared based on their antler parameters. Relative antler size and number of tines are variables supposed to reflect correspondingly the environmental conditions of sedentary populations within the growing season. The occurrence areas of two studied populations are distinctly isolated – separated with high mountain ridges, glaciers and fjords. The population in Petuniabukta occupies a sparsely vegetated region with harsh climatic conditions, whereas Skansbukta represents an area with continuous tundra vegetation cover, milder climatic conditions and, consequently, also a longer vegetation season. These environmental factors probably caused significant differences in the relative antler size and number of tines in the studied species. The Skansbukta population exhibited a larger relative antler size and higher number of tines than the population in Petuniabukta (both parameters differed significantly, p < 0.01). This difference reflects concisely the different environmental conditions of both locations. A comparison of Skansbukta population antler characteristics between years 2017 and 2018 did not reveal significant changes, most probably due to very similar atmospheric conditions in these two years (in terms of air temperature).


2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 213-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerónimo Torres-Porras ◽  
Juan Carranza ◽  
Javier Pérez-González

2007 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 127
Author(s):  
J. R. Saenz ◽  
G. T. Gentry ◽  
W. Forbes ◽  
B. Olcott ◽  
J. Chenevert ◽  
...  

The ability to cryopreserve epididymal sperm from mature postmortem bucks has long been of interest to both wildlife conservationists and deer ranchers. At present, there is loss of valuable genetics from the hunter harvest of trophy males. Increasing adult body weight and antler size of adult males would be of substantial economic value to the deer hunting industry. In this preliminary trial, 6 yearling pen-raised Whitetail does (47 to 58 kg), in good body condition, were isolated from all bucks prior to the onset of the fall breeding season. Females were synchronized for AI with a 14-day caprine CIDR and 200 IU of eCG (IM) at the time of CIDR removal. Does were timed AI 60 to 63 h after eCG with one 0.5-mL straw of frozen–thawed Whitetail sperm. All sperm used for AI were harvested from a single mature Whitetail buck that was hunter harvested during the previous hunting season. Within 3 h after death, the testes with scrotum were removed, enclosed in a plastic Ziploc bag, and then placed in a Styrofoam ice chest containing frozen cold packs. The ice chest was transported to the laboratory where sperm were extracted at 4�C in the late evening (&lt;12 h postmortem) by flushing the cauda epididymides with Triladyl� one-step extender (Minitube, Verona, WI, USA) in a retrograde flow from a small incision made in the cauda. The sperm–Triladyl mixture was flushed from the cauda incision into a sterile 50-mL tube using a 10-mL plastic syringe modified by heating and then stretching the tip until small enough to thread into the vas deferens. The sperm plus extender was then held at 4 to 10�C for 12 h and frozen at a concentration of &lt;50 million/straw using a commercial bull freezing protocol (Genex Custom Collection Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA). A random sample of straws was then thawed, resulting in an overall post-thaw motility of 60%. The remaining straws were left frozen in liquid nitrogen until the next breeding season. On the first of December, does (n = 6) were given 0.1 mL of Domosedan� (Pfizer Animal Health, Groton, CT, USA) IV and inseminated transcervically using a modified caprine speculum. All does were handled in a custom-built deer barn, and AI was performed by one technician in a drop-bottom deer chute (Deer Handler; Delclayna, Alberta, Canada). At 48 days after AI, 3 of the 6 does (50%) were diagnosed pregnant by transrectal ultrasonography. All pregnant females gave birth, producing 5 offspring (1 male and 1 female singletons and a set of mixed sex triplets) that ranged from 1.9 to 4.3 kg and had a mean gestation length of 196 days (range = 190–203 days). In summary, results indicate that live offspring can be produced from epididymal sperm harvested from mature hunter-harvested Whitetail bucks. Further experiments are needed to optimize techniques and protocols for the harvesting and usage of these gametes.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna C. Thalmann ◽  
R. Terry Bowyer ◽  
Ken A. Aho ◽  
Floyd W. Weckerly ◽  
Dale R. McCullough

For long-lived species, environmental factors experienced early in life can have lasting effects persisting into adulthood. Large herbivores can be susceptible to cohort-wide declines in fitness as a result of decreases in forage availability, because of extrinsic factors, including extreme climate or high population densities. To examine effects of cohort-specific extrinsic factors on size of adults, we performed a retrospective analysis on harvest data of 450 male black-tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus columbianus) over 19 years in central California, USA. We determined that population density of females had a more dominant effect than did precipitation on body size of males. Harvest of female deer resulted in increases in the overall size of males, even though a 6-year drought occurred during that treatment period. Body size was most influenced by female population density early in life, while antler size was highly affected by both weather early in life and the year directly before harvest. This study provides insights that improve our understanding of the role of cohort effects in body and antler size by cervids; and, in particular, that reduction in female population density can have a profound effect on the body and antler size of male deer.


2013 ◽  
Vol 94 (6) ◽  
pp. 1371-1379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalka A. Melnycky ◽  
Robert B. Weladji ◽  
Øystein Holand ◽  
Mauri Nieminen

Behaviour ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 79 (2-4) ◽  
pp. 108-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.H. Clutton-Brock

Abstract1. This paper reviews evidence for five functional explanations of the evolution of antlers in male cervids: that they are used as weapons in fights; that they allow individuals to defend themselves against predators; that they act as heat radiators during their period of growth; that they advertise an individual's fighting ability and allow males to assess each other without fighting; and that they increase the chances that a male will be selected as a mate by females. 2. There is extensive evidence that antlers are used in fights between competing males. Contrary to some suggestions in the literature, fights are regular during the breeding season and can be damaging. In species where fighting behaviour has been studied in detail, antlers have proved to be effective weapons of defence and offense, and there is no systematic evidence to support the suggestion that antler-less males (hummels) are more successful in competition for females than antlered stags. 3. Though male deer sometimes use their antlers in defence against predators, the absence of antlers in females of most species suggests that this is not their principal function. Nor does it seem likely that antlers evolved as heat-regulating mechanisms - in some species, they are grown during the winter months and there is no tendency for them to be larger in tropical species than in temperate ones. 4. Despite many suggestions, there is no conclusive evidence that males assess each other by their relative antler size and most measures of antler size and shape are not closely correlated with dominance or fighting ability. Nor is there firm evidence that females selectively mate with large-antlered males. 5. The absence of unequivocal support for the importance of antlers in defence against predators, in heat regulation, in assessment between rivals and in attracting mates leaves open the possibility that, despite their bizarre appearance, antlers evolved as weapons and are retained by selection because of their function in intra-specific combat.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document