Automated Recognition of Low-Level Process: A Pilot Validation Study of Zorro for Test-Driven Development

Author(s):  
Hongbing Kou ◽  
Philip M. Johnson
2009 ◽  
pp. 141-144
Author(s):  
Himanshu S. Moharana ◽  
J.S. Murty ◽  
S. K. Senapati ◽  
K. Khuntia

There is increasing concern about implementation failures in six sigma concept in supply chain management. The reason for many Six Sigma programmes to fail is due to an implementation model. Using a successful Six Sigma concept in an industry we have to perform strategic analysis driven by the market and the customer. It is necessary to establish a high- level, cross-functional team to drive the improvement initiative and to identify overall improvement tools. We can perform high-level process mapping and prioritize improvement opportunities. We have to develop a detailed plan for low-level improvement teams, and then to implement, document, and revise as necessary. This is important for both practitioners and academicians.


2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Corneille ◽  
Christoph Stahl

Associative attitude learning is typically viewed as a low-level process that automatically registers mere co-occurrences between stimuli, independent of their validity and relational meaning. This view invites to critically examine how attitude formation conforms to four operating conditions (i.e., unawareness, efficiency, goal independence, and uncontrollability) and two operating principles (i.e., unqualified registration of mere co-occurrences between stimuli and formation of direct stimulus–response links), which is the main purpose of the present contribution. The general discussion examines how contemporary attitude models endorse these conditions and principles. Overall, this contribution calls for (a) a nuanced understanding of the nature and scope of associative attitude learning, (b) a fine-grained understanding of how contemporary attitude models endorse conditions and principles reviewed here and find them relevant to their theorization of attitude formation, (c) a clarification of how direct and indirect evaluative measures relate to these conditions and principles, and (d) enhanced efforts in specifying contemporary attitude formation models.


1996 ◽  
pp. 63-76
Author(s):  
Tom Manns ◽  
Michael Coleman

2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 416-416
Author(s):  
Shai Sheji ◽  
Ruth Weissenberg ◽  
Gil Raviv ◽  
Igael Madgar

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document