Automated Recognition of Low-Level Process: A Pilot Validation Study of Zorro for Test-Driven Development

2006 ◽  
pp. 322-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongbing Kou ◽  
Philip M. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Validation Study ◽  
Automated Recognition ◽  
Test Driven Development ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Level Process

scholarly journals Implementation of Six Sigma in Supply Chain Management in Industries

2009 ◽  
pp. 141-144
Author(s):  
Himanshu S. Moharana ◽  
J.S. Murty ◽  
S. K. Senapati ◽  
K. Khuntia
Keyword(s):  
Supply Chain ◽  
Supply Chain Management ◽  
Six Sigma ◽  
Strategic Analysis ◽  
Process Mapping ◽  
Chain Management ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Implementation Model ◽  
High Level ◽  
Level Process

There is increasing concern about implementation failures in six sigma concept in supply chain management. The reason for many Six Sigma programmes to fail is due to an implementation model. Using a successful Six Sigma concept in an industry we have to perform strategic analysis driven by the market and the customer. It is necessary to establish a high- level, cross-functional team to drive the improvement initiative and to identify overall improvement tools. We can perform high-level process mapping and prioritize improvement opportunities. We have to develop a detailed plan for low-level improvement teams, and then to implement, document, and revise as necessary. This is important for both practitioners and academicians.

Associative Attitude Learning: A Closer Look at Evidence and How It Relates to Attitude Models

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Corneille ◽  
Christoph Stahl
Keyword(s):  
Operating Conditions ◽  
Attitude Formation ◽  
Present Contribution ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Stimulus Response ◽  
Fine Grained ◽  
Attitude Learning ◽  
Nuanced Understanding ◽  
Level Process

Associative attitude learning is typically viewed as a low-level process that automatically registers mere co-occurrences between stimuli, independent of their validity and relational meaning. This view invites to critically examine how attitude formation conforms to four operating conditions (i.e., unawareness, efficiency, goal independence, and uncontrollability) and two operating principles (i.e., unqualified registration of mere co-occurrences between stimuli and formation of direct stimulus–response links), which is the main purpose of the present contribution. The general discussion examines how contemporary attitude models endorse these conditions and principles. Overall, this contribution calls for (a) a nuanced understanding of the nature and scope of associative attitude learning, (b) a fine-grained understanding of how contemporary attitude models endorse conditions and principles reviewed here and find them relevant to their theorization of attitude formation, (c) a clarification of how direct and indirect evaluative measures relate to these conditions and principles, and (d) enhanced efforts in specifying contemporary attitude formation models.

Low-level Process Models

1996 ◽  
pp. 63-76
Author(s):  
Tom Manns ◽  
Michael Coleman
Keyword(s):  
Process Models ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Level Process

Removal of Plutonium from Low-Level Process Wastewaters by Adsorption

1992 ◽  
pp. 34-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. S. Barney ◽  
K. J. Lueck ◽  
J. W. Green
Keyword(s):  
Low Level ◽  
Level Process

A Validation Study of the Elementary and Advanced Screening Tests of the Clinical Evaluation of Language Functions (CELF)

1983 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 215-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sol Ribner ◽  
Laurence Becker ◽  
Sid Marks ◽  
Paul Kahn ◽  
Fred Wolfson
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Validation Study ◽  
Screening Tests ◽  
Language Functions

1578: A Validation Study of the Sperm Quality Analyzer SQA-V

2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 416-416
Author(s):  
Shai Sheji ◽  
Ruth Weissenberg ◽  
Gil Raviv ◽  
Igael Madgar
Keyword(s):  
Validation Study ◽  
Sperm Quality ◽  
Quality Analyzer ◽  
Sperm Quality Analyzer
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document