Low-level Process Models

1996 ◽  
pp. 63-76
Author(s):  
Tom Manns ◽  
Michael Coleman
2009 ◽  
pp. 141-144
Author(s):  
Himanshu S. Moharana ◽  
J.S. Murty ◽  
S. K. Senapati ◽  
K. Khuntia

There is increasing concern about implementation failures in six sigma concept in supply chain management. The reason for many Six Sigma programmes to fail is due to an implementation model. Using a successful Six Sigma concept in an industry we have to perform strategic analysis driven by the market and the customer. It is necessary to establish a high- level, cross-functional team to drive the improvement initiative and to identify overall improvement tools. We can perform high-level process mapping and prioritize improvement opportunities. We have to develop a detailed plan for low-level improvement teams, and then to implement, document, and revise as necessary. This is important for both practitioners and academicians.


2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Corneille ◽  
Christoph Stahl

Associative attitude learning is typically viewed as a low-level process that automatically registers mere co-occurrences between stimuli, independent of their validity and relational meaning. This view invites to critically examine how attitude formation conforms to four operating conditions (i.e., unawareness, efficiency, goal independence, and uncontrollability) and two operating principles (i.e., unqualified registration of mere co-occurrences between stimuli and formation of direct stimulus–response links), which is the main purpose of the present contribution. The general discussion examines how contemporary attitude models endorse these conditions and principles. Overall, this contribution calls for (a) a nuanced understanding of the nature and scope of associative attitude learning, (b) a fine-grained understanding of how contemporary attitude models endorse conditions and principles reviewed here and find them relevant to their theorization of attitude formation, (c) a clarification of how direct and indirect evaluative measures relate to these conditions and principles, and (d) enhanced efforts in specifying contemporary attitude formation models.


2003 ◽  
Vol 807 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Tsuchi ◽  
Toshihiro Seo ◽  
Richard Metcalfe ◽  
Kenji Kawano ◽  
Hiroyasu Takase ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTThe selection of Preliminary Investigation Areas (PIAs) to be considered in the siting procedure for a Japanese High Level Radioactive Waste (HLW) repository, will require Site-specific Evaluation Factors (SSEF) to be considered. Evaluation of these factors requires a methodology for taking into account various kinds of uncertainties in varied types of literature data. The study described here evaluated the application of Evidential Support Logic (ESL) for this purpose. The approach involves constructing hierarchical process models. Uncertainties are then propagated from the lowest processes, corresponding to data or information, through intermediate processes, to some top level process of interest, such as “assessing the existence of an active fault”. To evaluate the usefulness of ESL a hypothetical site was assessed. The results demonstrate the value of the approach to support decision-making in the selection of PIAs.


2014 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 379-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diogo R. Ferreira ◽  
Fernando Szimanski ◽  
Célia G. Ralha
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
DANIELA E. HERLEA ◽  
CATHOLIJN M. JONKER ◽  
JAN TREUR ◽  
NIEK J. E. WIJNGAARDS

In current literature few detailed process models for Requirements Engineering are presented: usually high-level activities are distinguished, without a more precise specification of each activity. In this paper the process of Requirements Engineering has been analyzed using knowledge-level modelling techniques, resulting in a well-specified compositional process model for the Requirements Engineering task. This process model is considered to be a generic process model: it can be refined (by instantiation or specialisation) into a process model for a specific kind of Requirements Engineering process.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (12) ◽  
pp. 18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalia Buldakova ◽  
Denisa Dociová ◽  
Peter Vittek

<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-font-family: 'MS Mincho'; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;" lang="EN-GB">This article describe the analysis of the process models of airport, which are described in Ground Operation Manual. The main goal is creating high level process map. </span>


2017 ◽  
Vol 74 ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexey A. Mitsyuk ◽  
Ivan S. Shugurov ◽  
Anna A. Kalenkova ◽  
Wil M.P. van der Aalst

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document