In Vivo Binding of Recombination Proteins to Non-DSB DNA Lesions and to Replication Forks

2020 ◽  
pp. 447-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Román González-Prieto ◽  
María J. Cabello-Lobato ◽  
Félix Prado
Keyword(s):  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
In Vivo Binding ◽  
Recombination Proteins

scholarly journals RuvAB and RecG Are Not Essential for the Recovery of DNA Synthesis Following UV-Induced DNA Damage in Escherichia coli

Genetics ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 166 (4) ◽  
pp. 1631-1640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet R Donaldson ◽  
Charmain T Courcelle ◽  
Justin Courcelle
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Replication Machinery ◽  
Dna Junctions ◽  
Fork Regression

Abstract Ultraviolet light induces DNA lesions that block the progression of the replication machinery. Several models speculate that the resumption of replication following disruption by UV-induced DNA damage requires regression of the nascent DNA or migration of the replication machinery away from the blocking lesion to allow repair or bypass of the lesion to occur. Both RuvAB and RecG catalyze branch migration of three- and four-stranded DNA junctions in vitro and are proposed to catalyze fork regression in vivo. To examine this possibility, we characterized the recovery of DNA synthesis in ruvAB and recG mutants. We found that in the absence of either RecG or RuvAB, arrested replication forks are maintained and DNA synthesis is resumed with kinetics that are similar to those in wild-type cells. The data presented here indicate that RecG- or RuvAB-catalyzed fork regression is not essential for DNA synthesis to resume following arrest by UV-induced DNA damage in vivo.

scholarly journals Interactions and Localization of Escherichia coli Error-Prone DNA Polymerase IV after DNA Damage

2015 ◽  
Vol 197 (17) ◽  
pp. 2792-2809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarita Mallik ◽  
Ellen M. Popodi ◽  
Andrew J. Hanson ◽  
Patricia L. Foster
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Dna Helicase ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Pol Iv ◽  
Dna Polymerase Iv ◽  
Stalled Replication Forks

ABSTRACTEscherichia coli's DNA polymerase IV (Pol IV/DinB), a member of the Y family of error-prone polymerases, is induced during the SOS response to DNA damage and is responsible for translesion bypass and adaptive (stress-induced) mutation. In this study, the localization of Pol IV after DNA damage was followed using fluorescent fusions. After exposure ofE. colito DNA-damaging agents, fluorescently tagged Pol IV localized to the nucleoid as foci. Stepwise photobleaching indicated ∼60% of the foci consisted of three Pol IV molecules, while ∼40% consisted of six Pol IV molecules. Fluorescently tagged Rep, a replication accessory DNA helicase, was recruited to the Pol IV foci after DNA damage, suggesting that thein vitrointeraction between Rep and Pol IV reported previously also occursin vivo. Fluorescently tagged RecA also formed foci after DNA damage, and Pol IV localized to them. To investigate if Pol IV localizes to double-strand breaks (DSBs), an I-SceI endonuclease-mediated DSB was introduced close to a fluorescently labeled LacO array on the chromosome. After DSB induction, Pol IV localized to the DSB site in ∼70% of SOS-induced cells. RecA also formed foci at the DSB sites, and Pol IV localized to the RecA foci. These results suggest that Pol IV interacts with RecAin vivoand is recruited to sites of DSBs to aid in the restoration of DNA replication.IMPORTANCEDNA polymerase IV (Pol IV/DinB) is an error-prone DNA polymerase capable of bypassing DNA lesions and aiding in the restart of stalled replication forks. In this work, we demonstratein vivolocalization of fluorescently tagged Pol IV to the nucleoid after DNA damage and to DNA double-strand breaks. We show colocalization of Pol IV with two proteins: Rep DNA helicase, which participates in replication, and RecA, which catalyzes recombinational repair of stalled replication forks. Time course experiments suggest that Pol IV recruits Rep and that RecA recruits Pol IV. These findings providein vivoevidence that Pol IV aids in maintaining genomic stability not only by bypassing DNA lesions but also by participating in the restoration of stalled replication forks.

scholarly journals Role of Double-Stranded DNA Translocase Activity of Human HLTF in Replication of Damaged DNA

2009 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 684-693 ◽  
Author(s):  
András Blastyák ◽  
Ildikó Hajdú ◽  
Ildikó Unk ◽  
Lajos Haracska
Keyword(s):  
Translesion Synthesis ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Template Switching ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Double Stranded Dna ◽  
Fork Regression ◽  
Dna Translocase ◽  
Damaged Dna

ABSTRACT Unrepaired DNA lesions can block the progression of the replication fork, leading to genomic instability and cancer in higher-order eukaryotes. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, replication through DNA lesions can be mediated by translesion synthesis DNA polymerases, leading to error-free or error-prone damage bypass, or by Rad5-mediated template switching to the sister chromatid that is inherently error free. While translesion synthesis pathways are highly conserved from yeast to humans, very little is known of a Rad5-like pathway in human cells. Here we show that a human homologue of Rad5, HLTF, can facilitate fork regression and has a role in replication of damaged DNA. We found that HLTF is able to reverse model replication forks, a process which depends on its double-stranded DNA translocase activity. Furthermore, from analysis of isolated dually labeled chromosomal fibers, we demonstrate that in vivo, HLTF promotes the restart of replication forks blocked at DNA lesions. These findings suggest that HLTF can promote error-free replication of damaged DNA and support a role for HLTF in preventing mutagenesis and carcinogenesis, providing thereby for its potential tumor suppressor role.

scholarly journals A unique arginine cluster in PolDIP2 enhances nucleotide binding and DNA synthesis by PrimPol

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazutoshi Kasho ◽  
Gorazd Stojkovič ◽  
Cristina Velázquez-Ruiz ◽  
Maria Isabel Martínez-Jiménez ◽  
Timothée Laurent ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Dna Polymerases ◽  
Polymerase Activity ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Flexible Loop ◽  
Nucleotide Incorporation ◽  
Dntp Binding ◽  
Incorporation Efficiency

ABSTRACTReplication forks often stall at damaged DNA. Resumption of DNA synthesis can occur by replacement of the replicative DNA polymerase with specialized, error-prone translesion DNA polymerases (TLS), that have higher tolerance for damaged substrates. Several of these polymerases (Polλ, Polη and PrimPol) are stimulated in DNA synthesis through interaction with PolDIP2, however the mechanism of this PolDIP2-dependent stimulation is still unclear. Here we show that PrimPol uses a flexible loop to interact with the C-terminal ApaG-like domain of PolDIP2, and that this contact is essential for PrimPol’s enhanced processivity. PolDIP2 increases PrimPol’s primer-template and dNTP binding affinity, which concomitantly enhances PrimPol’s nucleotide incorporation efficiency. This activity is dependent on a unique arginine cluster in PolDIP2 and could be essential for PrimPol to function in vivo, since the polymerase activity of PrimPol alone is very limited. This mechanism, where the affinity for dNTPs gets increased by PolDIP2 binding, could be common to all other PolDIP2-interacting TLS polymerases, i.e. Polλ, Polη, Polζ and REV1, and might be critical for their in vivo function of tolerating DNA lesions at physiological nucleotide concentrations.

scholarly journals The Zn-finger of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad18 and its adjacent region mediate interaction with Rad5

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Orsolya Frittmann ◽  
Vamsi K Gali ◽  
Miklos Halmai ◽  
Robert Toth ◽  
Zsuzsanna Gyorfy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligase ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Template Switching ◽  
Adjacent Region ◽  
Yeast Two Hybrid ◽  
Replication Complex ◽  
Two Hybrid

Abstract DNA damages that hinder the movement of the replication complex can ultimately lead to cell death. To avoid that, cells possess several DNA damage bypass mechanisms. The Rad18 ubiquitin ligase controls error-free and mutagenic pathways that help the replication complex to bypass DNA lesions by monoubiquitylating PCNA at stalled replication forks. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, two of the Rad18 governed pathways are activated by monoubiquitylated PCNA and they involve translesion synthesis polymerases, whereas a third pathway needs subsequent polyubiquitylation of the same PCNA residue by another ubiquitin ligase the Rad5 protein, and it employs template switching. The goal of this study was to dissect the regulatory role of the multidomain Rad18 in DNA damage bypass using a structure-function based approach. Investigating deletion and point mutant RAD18 variants in yeast genetic and yeast two-hybrid assays we show that the Zn-finger of Rad18 mediates its interaction with Rad5, and the N-terminal adjacent region is also necessary for Rad5 binding. Moreover, results of the yeast two-hybrid and in vivo ubiquitylation experiments raise the possibility that direct interaction between Rad18 and Rad5 might not be necessary for the function of the Rad5 dependent pathway. The presented data also reveal that yeast Rad18 uses different domains to mediate its association with itself and with Rad5. Our results contribute to better understanding of the complex machinery of DNA damage bypass pathways.

scholarly journals The splicing factor XAB2 interacts with ERCC1-XPF and XPG for R-loop processing

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Evi Goulielmaki ◽  
Maria Tsekrekou ◽  
Nikos Batsiotos ◽  
Mariana Ascensão-Ferreira ◽  
Eleftheria Ledaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Rna Splicing ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Intron Retention ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Splicing Factor ◽  
Loop Formation ◽  
Rna Targets ◽  
Underlying Mechanisms

AbstractRNA splicing, transcription and the DNA damage response are intriguingly linked in mammals but the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Using an in vivo biotinylation tagging approach in mice, we show that the splicing factor XAB2 interacts with the core spliceosome and that it binds to spliceosomal U4 and U6 snRNAs and pre-mRNAs in developing livers. XAB2 depletion leads to aberrant intron retention, R-loop formation and DNA damage in cells. Studies in illudin S-treated cells and Csbm/m developing livers reveal that transcription-blocking DNA lesions trigger the release of XAB2 from all RNA targets tested. Immunoprecipitation studies reveal that XAB2 interacts with ERCC1-XPF and XPG endonucleases outside nucleotide excision repair and that the trimeric protein complex binds RNA:DNA hybrids under conditions that favor the formation of R-loops. Thus, XAB2 functionally links the spliceosomal response to DNA damage with R-loop processing with important ramifications for transcription-coupled DNA repair disorders.

scholarly journals DisA Limits RecG Activities at Stalled or Reversed Replication Forks

Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 1357
Author(s):  
Rubén Torres ◽  
Carolina Gándara ◽  
Begoña Carrasco ◽  
Ignacio Baquedano ◽  
Silvia Ayora ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atp Hydrolysis ◽  
Holliday Junctions ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Stable Complex ◽  
Dna Unwinding ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Dna Structures ◽  
Checkpoint Protein

The DNA damage checkpoint protein DisA and the branch migration translocase RecG are implicated in the preservation of genome integrity in reviving haploid Bacillus subtilis spores. DisA synthesizes the essential cyclic 3′, 5′-diadenosine monophosphate (c‑di-AMP) second messenger and such synthesis is suppressed upon replication perturbation. In vitro, c-di-AMP synthesis is suppressed when DisA binds DNA structures that mimic stalled or reversed forks (gapped forks or Holliday junctions [HJ]). RecG, which does not form a stable complex with DisA, unwinds branched intermediates, and in the presence of a limiting ATP concentration and HJ DNA, it blocks DisA-mediated c-di-AMP synthesis. DisA pre-bound to a stalled or reversed fork limits RecG-mediated ATP hydrolysis and DNA unwinding, but not if RecG is pre-bound to stalled or reversed forks. We propose that RecG-mediated fork remodeling is a genuine in vivo activity, and that DisA, as a molecular switch, limits RecG-mediated fork reversal and fork restoration. DisA and RecG might provide more time to process perturbed forks, avoiding genome breakage.

scholarly journals Impaired in vivo binding of MeCP2 to chromatin in the absence of its DNA methyl-binding domain

2013 ◽  
Vol 41 (9) ◽  
pp. 4888-4900 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. P. Stuss ◽  
M. Cheema ◽  
M. K. Ng ◽  
A. Martinez de Paz ◽  
B. Williamson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Binding Domain ◽  
In Vivo Binding
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document