Basic Postulates of the Looming Vulnerability Model

2018 ◽  
pp. 43-56
Author(s):  
John H. Riskind ◽  
Neil A. Rector
Keyword(s):  
Vulnerability Model

scholarly journals Response Processes to Looming Appetitive and Aversive Cues in Euthymic Bipolar Patients and Their First-Degree Relatives: An Exploratory Study

2020 ◽  
pp. 025371762097528
Author(s):  
Velprashanth Venkatesan ◽  
Christoday R J Khess ◽  
Umesh Shreekantiah ◽  
Nishant Goyal ◽  
K. K. Kshitiz
Keyword(s):  
Bipolar Disorder ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Sensitivity To Reward ◽  
Bipolar Group ◽  
First Degree Relatives ◽  
Vulnerability Model ◽  
Increased Sensitivity ◽  
Appetitive Cues ◽  
Spectrum Disorders ◽  
Bipolar Patients

Background: Patients with bipolar disorder demonstrate increased sensitivity to appetitive/rewarding stimuli even during euthymia. On presentation of arousing pictures, they show a peculiar response, suggesting heightened vigilance. While responding to looming arousing cues, studies show subjects with anxiety spectrum disorders exhibit increased reaction time (RT), explained by the “looming-vulnerability model.” This study aimed to investigate the responses to looming arousing cues in euthymic bipolar patients and their first-degree relatives, as compared to healthy controls. Method: A looming appetitive and aversive cue paradigm was designed for assessing the RT of patients to process appetitive and aversive cues. The behavioral inhibition/activation and sensitivity to reward/punishment amongst the groups were also assessed. Results: The bipolar group showed significantly longer RT to process appetitive cues irrespective of the looming condition. Aversive cues elicited significantly longer RT in both the bipolar group and in first-degree relatives, but only when presented with the looming condition. Significant looming bias was elicited in the bipolar group which suggested a particular cognitive style to looming cues. A composite measure of RT along with sensitivity to reward/punishment distinguishes the bipolar group and their first-degree relatives from the healthy controls. Conclusion: The looming vulnerability model may provide important insights for future exploration of cognitive endophenotypes in bipolar disorder.

To Report or Not to Report: Nurses' Attitudes toward Reporting Co-Workers Suspected of Substance Abuse

1995 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 313-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane C. Hood ◽  
Patsy L. Duphorne
Keyword(s):  
New Mexico ◽  
Diffusion Model ◽  
Substance Abusing ◽  
Social Forces ◽  
Occupational Culture ◽  
Diversion Program ◽  
Work Settings ◽  
Vulnerability Model ◽  
Logistic Regressions ◽  
Program Knowledge

Using survey data from a stratified, random sample of New Mexico nurses ( N=498), this study helps to explain why some nurses choose informal rather than formal reporting strategies when confronted with substance-abusing co-workers. The researchers mailed a questionnaire to male and female RNs and LPNs in 1989, two years after New Mexico established its diversion program for substance-abusing nurses. Using a combination of OLS and logistic regressions, the authors test the diffusion model predicting that program knowledge leads to program acceptance and implementation. Finding little evidence of a link between program knowledge and implementation, the authors then offer two alternatives. The vulnerability model predicts that workers in the least secure positions will be most likely to avoid making formal reports, whereas the occupational hegemony model argues that administrators will avoid formal reporting to maintain control over their own work settings. Because their results offer most support for the latter two models, the authors reject the diffusion model and conclude that occupational culture and organizational politics are the most important social forces intervening between program diffusion and implementation.

Uncertainty in a Hurricane Vulnerability Model

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Vicente Silva de Abreu ◽  
Jean-Paul Pinelli ◽  
Kurt Gurley ◽  
Karthik Yarasuri
Keyword(s):  
Vulnerability Model ◽  
Hurricane Vulnerability

scholarly journals The Longitudinal Association between Self–Esteem and Depressive Symptoms in Adolescents: Separating Between–Person Effects from Within–Person Effects

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 653-671 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Masselink ◽  
E. Van Roekel ◽  
B.L. Hankin ◽  
L. Keijsers ◽  
G.M.A. Lodder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Depressive Symptoms ◽  
Self Esteem ◽  
The Other ◽  
Personality Psychology ◽  
Random Intercept ◽  
Vulnerability Model ◽  
Longitudinal Association ◽  
The Cross ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Age Range

Many longitudinal studies have investigated whether self–esteem predicts depressive symptoms (vulnerability model) or the other way around (scar model) in adolescents. The most common method of analysis has been the cross–lagged panel model (CLPM). The CLPM does not separate between–person effects from within–person effects, making it unclear whether the results from previous studies actually reflect the within–person effects or whether they reflect differences between people. We investigated the associations between self–esteem and depressive symptoms at the within–person level, using random intercept cross–lagged panel models (RI–CLPMs). To get an impression of the magnitude of possible differences between the RI–CLPM and the CLPM, we compared the results of both models. We used data from three longitudinal adolescent samples (age range: 7–18 years; study 1: N = 1948; study 2: N = 1455; study 3: N = 316). Intervals between the measurements were 1–1.5 years. Single–paper meta–analyses showed support for small within–person associations from self–esteem to depressive symptoms, but not the other way around, thus only providing some support for the vulnerability model. The cross–lagged associations in the aggregated RI–CLPM and CLPM showed similar effect sizes. Overall, our results show that over 1– to 1.5–year time intervals, low self–esteem may negatively influence depressive symptoms over time within adolescents, but only weakly so. © 2018 The Authors. European Journal of Personality published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Association of Personality Psychology

Misfortune and resilience: a community study of women

1984 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 347-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. E. Bebbington ◽  
E. Sturt ◽  
C. Tennant ◽  
J. Hurry
Keyword(s):  
Social Support ◽  
Working Class ◽  
Psychiatric Disorder ◽  
Community Survey ◽  
The Other ◽  
Community Study ◽  
Vulnerability Factors ◽  
Vulnerability Model ◽  
Working Class Women

SynopsisA community survey of psychiatric disorder carried out in South London enabled the authors to investigate the ‘vulnerability model’ proposed by Brown & Harris (1978). In the current study none of the ‘vulnerability factors’ proposed by Brown & Harris fulfilled the requirements of the model. It was, however, found that working class women with children seemed particularly prone to develop minor psychiatric disorder in response to adversity. A similar result is apparent in the analyses of the earlier authors. A number of studies now published give some support to the vulnerability model using what are broadly measures of social support, but there is little corroboration using the other variables proposed by Brown & Harris.

Stress and alcohol use: A daily process examination of the stressor–vulnerability model.

2000 ◽  
Vol 78 (5) ◽  
pp. 979-994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Armeli ◽  
Margaret Anne Carney ◽  
Howard Tennen ◽  
Glenn Affleck ◽  
Timothy P. O'Neil
Keyword(s):  
Alcohol Use ◽  
Vulnerability Model ◽  
Daily Process
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document