Obstetric Management

2018 ◽  
pp. 185-193
Author(s):  
Ana Carolina Rabachini Caetano ◽  
Luciano Marcondes Machado Nardozza
Keyword(s):  
Obstetric Management

Discrepancy Analysis between Clinical Versus Ultrasound Estimated Fetal Weight and Actual Birth Weight at 3rd Trimester

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-38
Author(s):  
Naznin Rashid Shewly ◽  
Menoka Ferdous ◽  
Hasina Begum ◽  
Shahadat Hossain Khan ◽  
Sheema Rani Debee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Low Birth Weight ◽  
Fetal Weight ◽  
P Value ◽  
Weight Estimation ◽  
Third Trimester ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Fetal Weight Estimation ◽  
Obstetric Management ◽  
Estimated Fetal Weight

Background: In obstetric management fetal weight estimation is an important consideration when planning the mode of delivery in our day to day practice. In Bangladesh low birth weight is a major public health problem & incidence is 38% - 58%. Neonatal mortality and morbidity also yet high. So accurate antenatal estimation of fetal weight is a good way to detect macrosomia or small for date baby. Thus to improve the pregnancy outcome and neonatal outcome decreasing various chance of neonatal mortality and morbidity antenatal fetal weight prediction is an invaluable parameter in some situation where to identify the at risk pregnancy for low birth weight become necessary. Reliable method for prenatal estimation of fetal weight two modalities have got popularity - Clinical estimation and another one is ultrasonic estimation. This study was designed to determine the accuracy of clinical versus ultrasound estimated fetal weight detecting the discrepancy with actual birth weight at third trimester. So that we can verify more reliable and accurate method. Objectives: To find out more accurate and reliable modality of fetal weight estimation in antenatal period during obstetric management planning. To compare clinical versus ultrasound estimated fetal weight & to determine discrepancy of both variable with actual birth weight. Method: This prospective, cross sectional analytical study was carried out in Dhaka Medical College Hospital from January 2006 to December 2006. By purposive sampling 100 pregnant women fulfilling inclusion criteria were included in my study in third trimester (29wks-40wks). In clinical weight estimation procedure SFH (Symphysio Fundal Height) was measured in centimeter. On pervaginal finding whether vertex below or above the ischial spine was determined. By Johnson’s formula fetal weight in grams was estimated. Then by ultrasound scan different biometric measurements were taken and finally by Hadlock’s formula fetal weight was estimated. Eventually actual birth weight was taken after birth by Globe Brand weighing machine. Accuracy of both modalities were compared and which one was more reliable predictor was determined by statistical analysis. Results: After data collection were analyzed by computer based software (SPSS). There was gradual and positive relationship between symphysiofundal height and estimated birth weight. Discrepancy between clinical and actual birth weight at third trimester was statistically significant – Paired Student’s ‘t’ test was done where p value was <0.001. Whereas discrepancy between sonographically estimated fetal weight with actual birth weight was not statistically significant (by paired ‘t’ test where p value was >0.05). That implies discrepancy between ultrasound estimated fetal weight and actual birth weight was significantly less than that of clinically estimated fetal weight. 14% clinically and 46% sonographically estimated fetal weight were observed within £ 5% of actual birth weight. 31% clinical and 42% sonographically estimates observed within 6% to 10% of actual birth weight and 55% clinical and 12% sonographically estimate were >10% of actual birth weight. That is about 88% sonographical versus 45% clinical estimates were within 10% of actual birth weight. Conclusion: There is no doubt about importance of fetal weight in many obstetric situations. Clinical decisions at times depends on fetal weight. Whether to use oxytocin, to use forceps or vacuum for delivery or extend of trial or ended by Caesarian section immediately or no scope of trial to be largely depend on fetal size and weight. So more accurate modality for antenatal fetal weight estimation has paramount importance. In my study sonographically estimated weight have more accuracy than that of clinical estimate in predicting actual birth weight. Sonographically estimated fetal weight is more reliable, accurate and reproducible rather than other modality. J Shaheed Suhrawardy Med Coll, June 2019, Vol.11(1); 32-38

Obstetric Management in Gestational Diabetes

Diabetes Care ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement 2) ◽  
pp. S175-S179 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. L. Conway
Keyword(s):  
Gestational Diabetes ◽  
Obstetric Management

Obstetric management and outcome related to maternal characteristics

1988 ◽  
Vol 158 (3) ◽  
pp. 470-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.R.S. Dougherty ◽  
A.D. Jones
Keyword(s):  
Maternal Characteristics ◽  
Obstetric Management

Recurrent Obstetric Management Mistakes Identified by Simulation

2007 ◽  
Vol 62 (10) ◽  
pp. 636-638
Author(s):  
Sharon Maslovitz ◽  
Gad Barkai ◽  
Joseph B. Lessing ◽  
Amitai Ziv ◽  
Ariel Many
Keyword(s):  
Obstetric Management

Perinatal Care at the Threshold of Viability

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 96 (5) ◽  
pp. 974-976
Author(s):  
◽  
◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Perinatal Care ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Extremely Low Birth Weight ◽  
Low Birth Weight Infants ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Obstetric Management ◽  
The Cost ◽  
The Impact

The survival rate for infants at the threshold of viability has been improving. However, there are insufficient data regarding the cost(s) of initial and ongoing care of these infants and the long-term outcome of survivors. Furthermore, there has been little study of the impact of obstetric management on the survival rates of extremely low birth weight infants and on long-term morbidities. Continued research on these issues is imperative, and physicians need to remain informed of changing statistics.

Obstetric Management of Preterm Labour

1984 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 373-390
Author(s):  
PETER W. HOWIE ◽  
NAREN B. PATEL
Keyword(s):  
Preterm Labour ◽  
Obstetric Management

Common Maternal Genetic Syndromes II: Marfan Syndrome

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Said Al-Beshri ◽  
Nathaniel H. Robin
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Marfan Syndrome ◽  
Accurate Diagnosis ◽  
Genetic Syndromes ◽  
Connective Tissues ◽  
Ectopia Lentis ◽  
Surgical Interventions ◽  
Obstetric Management ◽  
Careful Physical Examination

Marfan syndrome is an autosomal dominant syndrome that affects various connective tissues including the aorta and skeletal system. It represent a major cause of aortic dissection in individuals with seemingly unremarkable past medical history, and is the most common cause of aortic dissection in pregnancy. Prompt and accurate diagnosis can be lifesaving. Careful physical examination and detailed personal and family history is vital for clinical evaluation. Genetic testing is often needed for accurate diagnosis but result interpretation might be challenging and genetic counseling is always required. Established guidelines can help navigate the challenges in obstetric management, which may include major surgical interventions during or after pregnancy. This review contains 6 figures, 4 tables, and 40 references. Keywords: Marfan syndrome, FBN1, aortic dissection, dilatation, connective tissue, ectopia lentis, pectus, systemic score, Ghent diagnostic criteria, genetic testing.

Fetal platelet counts in the obstetric management of immunologic thrombocytopenic purpura

1980 ◽  
Vol 136 (4) ◽  
pp. 495-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
James R. Scott ◽  
Dwight P. Cruikshank ◽  
Neil K. Kochenour ◽  
Roy M. Pitkin ◽  
James C. Warenski
Keyword(s):  
Thrombocytopenic Purpura ◽  
Platelet Counts ◽  
Obstetric Management

scholarly journals Trial of scar in post caesarean pregnancies

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 1173
Author(s):  
G. Kuppulakshmi ◽  
S. Saranya
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Caesarean Delivery ◽  
Uterine Wall ◽  
Perinatal Morbidity ◽  
Surgical Incision ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Caesarean Birth ◽  
Obstetric Management ◽  
One Year ◽  
Present Pregnancy

Background: The term caesarean delivery used to describe the delivery of a fetus through a surgical incision of the intact anterior uterine wall. The objective of this study was to analyse the maternal and perinatal morbidity between successful VBAC and failed vaginal delivery in cases selected for trial of labour.Methods: Prospective study conducted in Government RSRM Lying In Hospital, Government Stanley Medical College, Chennai over a period of one year from January 2017 to December 2017.Results: Trial of labour in previous caesarean section was more successful when the interval between previous caesarean and present pregnancy was between two to four years 86.40%. Conclusions: Most patients with a prior caesarean birth are candidates for VBAC. In properly selected women, a trial of labour after one previous low transverse caesarean section constitutes the best and safest form of obstetric management.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document