scholarly journals Field Normalization of Scientometric Indicators

2019 ◽  
pp. 281-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ludo Waltman ◽  
Nees Jan van Eck
Keyword(s):  
Scientometric Indicators ◽  
Field Normalization

Cross-field normalization of scientometric indicators

1996 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 311-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Schubert ◽  
T. Braun
Keyword(s):  
Scientometric Indicators ◽  
Field Normalization

Handbook for Scientometrics: Science and Technology Development Indicators

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Akoev ◽  
◽  
Valentina Markusova ◽  
Olga Moskaleva ◽  
Vladimir Pislyakov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Technology Development ◽  
Citation Index ◽  
Research Evaluation ◽  
Research Management ◽  
Research Assessment ◽  
Research Institutions ◽  
Scientometric Indicators ◽  
Development Indicators ◽  
Reasonable Approach ◽  
Eugene Garfield

The Second edition Russian Scientometric Handbook is designed to provide an overview of the field of scientometrics. The Handbook describes the history of creation of the breakthrough concept of citation indexing by Dr. Eugene Garfield, and development of the first multidisciplinary scholarly citation index, the Science Citation Index. Application of scientometric tools and methods in research management and resource allocation is discussed. Authors survey various scientometric indicators relevant to individual researchers, journals, research institutions and whole countries. Authors explore new types of indicators, such as altmetrics, relationship between scientometric indicators and the nature of scientific communication, and various methods of visualizing scientometric information. Possibilities and limitations of various scientometric techniques are examined. Authors highlight the need for an informed and reasonable approach to the use of quantitative indicators for research assessment. The Handbook includes the first Russian translations of three articles by Dr. Eugene Garfield. The Handbook is intended for use by researchers, science analysts, universities and research institutions administrators, libraries and information centers staff, graduate students, and the general reader interested in scientometrics and research evaluation.

University scientometric indicators aggregation at the regional level

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 1788-1804
Author(s):  
D.S. Tereshchenko ◽  
◽  
V.S. Shcherbakov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Regional Level ◽  
Scientometric Indicators

scholarly journals Scientometric Indicators of Media Researchers in the e-library

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 597-613
Author(s):  
Irina Demina
Keyword(s):  
Academic Community ◽  
Educational Organizations ◽  
Russian Science ◽  
Electronic Library ◽  
H Index ◽  
Scientometric Indicators ◽  
Russian Science Citation Index ◽  
Federal Districts ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Number Of Citations

This study extended the author's previous research in the field of scientometrics of media researchers on the topic “Mass information. Journalism. Mass media” in Russian electronic library and Russian Science Citation Index. The methodology was a census of the personalities of the first hundred authors ranked by the level of the h-index in 2020 compared to 2017, and in some aspects — from 2016. The study analyzed the changes in the h-index over the years under study, changes in the authors' geography by federal districts and cities of the Russian Federation, their academic position, the distribution of doctors and candidates of sciences in scientific majors in accordance with the awarded degree, as well as the distribution of rating personalities by actual scientific interests and taught courses in their affiliated scientific and educational organizations. The study revealed the importance of scientometric indicators for authors and scientific and educational organizations to determine their place in the academic community, the relevance of topics and authors’ research in the general academic landscape, and material incentives. At the same time, it was noted that the system of scientometric indicators is changing: perhaps the h-index the number of published works and the number of citations in the RSCI will remain as an object of research by historians of science to determine the common place of Russian (and Soviet) scientists in the science development, and in addition or to replace them there will be new indicators. One of them is the "percentile" recently introduced into the list of scientometric indicators. Studies of the values of scientometric indicators will remain relevant in the future.

scholarly journals РИЗИКИ ВПРОВАДЖЕННЯ ЕЛЕКТРОННИХ БІБЛІОМЕТРИЧНИХ СИСТЕМ ОЦІНЮВАННЯ ЕФЕКТИВНОСТІ ДІЯЛЬНОСТІ НАУКОВИХ ПРАЦІВНИКІВ

2015 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Valeriy Yu. Bykov ◽  
Nataliia V. Soroko
Keyword(s):  
Objective Evaluation ◽  
Scientific Activity ◽  
Publication Activity ◽  
Google Scholar ◽  
Network Services ◽  
Electronic Systems ◽  
Scientific Publications ◽  
Scientometric Indicators ◽  
Personal Contribution

The article deals with the results of the analysis of international and domestic experience in the use of network services, which can independently evaluate the quality of electronic publications and scientists’ publication activity. It can be achieved by the analysis of the values of scientometric indicators included in the bibliometric open electronic systems. This approach is associated with certain risks of objective evaluation of researchers’ scientific activity efficiency. The conditions for the inclusion of scientific publications in the search systems like Google Scholar are considered. It is concluded that the scientometric base, which is today an international and widely used in practice, should be developed to provide a more adequate reflection of the character and level of scientists’ scientific activity, as well as their personal contribution to the development of certain areas of science.

scholarly journals Comparative Analysis of Research Performance of Medical Universities Based on Qualitative and Quantitative Scientometric Indicators

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoleikha Ranjbar-Pirmousa ◽  
Narges Borji-Zemeidani ◽  
Mirsaeed Attarch ◽  
Shadman Nemati ◽  
Farzaneh Aminpour
Keyword(s):  
Research Performance ◽  
Citation Impact ◽  
Medical Sciences ◽  
Northern Iran ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Scientometric Indicators ◽  
Scientific Outputs ◽  
Number Of Publications ◽  
Number Of Citations

Evaluation of the research status of the academic institution provides it with the possibility of accurate research policymaking. Scientometric indicators are important tools for evaluating scientific activities of individuals, groups, and institutions. The current research aims to analysis the research performance of medical universities in Northern Iran based on quantitative and qualitative scientometric indicators. In this cross-sectional descriptive study, the Scopus-indexed scientific documents provided by medical universities in the Northern Iran have been studied in terms of number of publications, number of citations, average number of Citations per Publication (C/P), Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI), scientific collaborations, the number of in top 10% citation percentile, and the number of publications in top 10% journal percentile according to CiteScore, Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP), and SCImagoJournal Rank (SJR) indicators during a five years period. According to the findings, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences has gained the highest position in terms of the number of publications and citations, number of publications with international and national collaborations, and  academic-industrial collaborations., while Golestan University of Medical Sciences has gained a higher position in terms of scientific outputs in top 10% citation percentile and journal percentile, CiteScore, SNIP, SJR and C/P. In terms of the FWCI indicator, Golestan University of Medical Sciences has achieved the highest value. Considering academic status and research capabilities of medical universities in the Northern Iran, increasing academic-industrial collaboration, expanding academic collaboration with superior universities and institutions around the world can be effective in increasing the quality of research and upgrading academic ranks of universities at national, regional and international levels. © 2019Tehran University of Medical Sciences. All rights reserved. Acta MedIran 2019;57(7):448-455.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document