Human Rights Reporting of BRIC and Non-BRIC MNEs: An Exploratory Comparative Analysis

2019 ◽  
pp. 157-173
Author(s):  
Stefan Zagelmeyer
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Comparative Analysis

Constitutional and Legal Restrictions in the European Union Countries in the Context of the COVID 19 Pandemic

2020 ◽  
pp. 92-97
Author(s):  
A. V. Kuznetsov
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Human Rights ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
International Law ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Eu Countries ◽  
European Union Countries ◽  
Legal Restrictions ◽  
Restrictive Measures ◽  
The Eu

The article examines the norms of international law and the legislation of the EU countries. The list of main provisions of constitutional and legal restrictions in the European Union countries is presented. The application of the norms is described Human rights conventions. The principle of implementing legal acts in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic is considered. A comparative analysis of legal restrictive measures in the States of the European Union is carried out.

scholarly journals The Material and Procedural Aspects of Non Bis In Idem Principle in Proceedings on Administrative Offenses

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 39-42
Author(s):  
Artem R. Nobel ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
European Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Administrative Responsibility

The essence of the principle of one-time administrative responsibility is considered, its concept and proposals for improving the provisions of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation are formulated. The conclusions are based on the provisions of the legislation on administrative offenses, the legal positions of the highest courts of the Russian Federation, the European Court of Human Rights, a comparative analysis of the current criminal and criminal procedure legislation. The operation of the principle non bis in idem in proceedings on the cases of administrative offenses is revealed by highlighting the material and procedural elements that make up its content.

scholarly journals Comparative Study of the Roles of ASEAN and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation in Responding to the Rohingya Crisis

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
Irawan Jati
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Southeast Asia ◽  
Andaman Sea ◽  
Regional Organization ◽  
Humanitarian Action ◽  
Target Community

Since 2012, Southeast Asia has witnessed the human rights tragedy of the Rohingya people of Myanmar. Hundreds of thousands of Rohingya have been displaced from their homes and traveled to refugee facilities in Myanmar and Bangladesh, while others have been stranded on the Andaman Sea. The Rohingya crisis is perhaps the most horrific human rights tragedy after the crisis in Vietnam in the 1970s. As the crisis has developed, international communities, including ASEAN and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), have responded to the crisis. As the main regional organization, ASEAN has been hoped to elucidate the crisis tactically through peaceful means. OIC, meanwhile, has been expected to join humanitarian action using a diplomatic approach to other international humanitarian bodies, including the UNHCR. However, it is obvious that ASEAN's response to the crisis has been limited to diplomatic oration and failed to prevent a wider crisis. For OIC, its humanitarian solidarity has lacked access to the target community. Therefore, this paper would like to attempt a comparative analysis to describe the central inquiry; how have ASEAN and OIC responded to the Rohingya crisis? This analysis involves studying ASEAN and OIC publications and related references. The initial argument of this paper is that both organizations have given reasonable responses to the crisis, but have been unable to halt its advance.

scholarly journals O método educativo de Dom Bosco (Sistema Preventivo) e os princípios da Declaração Universal dos Direitos Humanos

2017 ◽  
pp. 147-183
Author(s):  
Jose Kuttianimattathil
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Universal Declaration ◽  
Human Rights Education ◽  
Derechos Humanos ◽  
Palabras Clave ◽  
El Sistema

O artigo aborda as relações possíveis de serem estabelecidas entre o Sistema Preventivo, como idealizado por Dom Bosco, e a Declaração Universal dos Direitos Humanos. O autor esclarece que não se trata de uma análise comparativa, mas de apontar como o Sistema Preventivo e a Declaração Universal dos Direitos Humanos se enriquecem e se apoiam. A argumentação traz ainda os desafios que o Sistema Preventivo deve enfrentar para promover, decisivamente, os direitos humanos.Palavras-chave: Sistema Preventivo. Declaração Universal dos Direitos Humanos. Desafios da educação.Don Bosco's educative method (Preventive System) and the tenets of the Universal Declaration of Human RightAbstractThe article discusses the possible relations between the Preventive System, as conceived by Don Bosco, and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The author clarifies that this is not a comparative analysis, but aims to point out how the Preventive System and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights are enriched and supported one by other. The argument also brings the challenges that the Preventive System must face to decisively promote human rights.Keywords: Preventive System. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Education challenges.El método educativo de Don Bosco (Sistema Preventivo) y los principios básicos de la Declaración Universal De Derechos HumanosResumenEl artículo aborda las relaciones posibles de ser establecidas entre el Sistema Preventivo, como ideado por Don Bosco, y la Declaración Universal de los Derechos Humanos. El autor aclara que no se trata de un analisis comparativo, sino de senalar como el sistema preventivo y la Declaración Universal de los Derechos Humanos se enriquecen y se apoyan. La argumentación trae aún los desafios que el Sistema Preventivo debe enfrentar para promover, decisivamente, los derechos humanos. Palabras clave: Sistema Preventivo. Declaración Universal de los Derechos Humanos. Desafios educación.

European Court of Human Rights and the Bulgarian Judicial System

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 535-544
Author(s):  
Aleksandur Kirkov ◽  
◽  
Ana Andonova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Essential Feature ◽  
Methodological Approach ◽  
Scientific Work ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Judicial System ◽  
European Convention ◽  
National Courts ◽  
European Court

Bulgaria ratified the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in 1992, as such this European act has become part of our domestic legislation. Explaining in detail the differences and similarities between the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg and the Bulgarian judicial system, we will actually see how much they are similar. This is the purpose of the present study - comparative analysis in all aspects: territorial jurisdiction, legal jurisdiction, including procedurally legitimate persons to file complaints, procedural issues, stages of the process, court decisions and appeals. The first and most important task of the study is to get acquainted in detail with our European rights, as well as their judicial protection. On the other hand, the knowledge of the European judicial mechanisms leads to the expansion of our national horizons in a supranational perspective, to opportunities for professional realization outside the borders of the country, on a European and global scale. The research method used in the present scientific work is the comparative analysis. The methodology we refer to in preparing the analysis is based on a predetermined methodological approach and structure in conducting the analysis. The methodological approach itself includes a general overview of the legal framework, regulating the administration of justice in national courts and at European level. An essential feature of the approach used is to compare the two established legal systems, at home and in Strasbourg, at all levels, to explore links and interdependencies possible differences. Expected results: acquainting the Bulgarians with their European rights, as in case of violation of these rights, learning about the mechanisms for their protection in court. Conclusions and summaries: Bulgaria is part of the common European framework. As such, its citizens are Bulgarians, but also Europeans. Namely, as Europeans, they have rights that are guaranteed to them by Europe and that should be respected in Bulgaria. Failure to respect these European rights creates conflicts that should be resolved by both national courts and the European Court of Human Rights.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document