Resin and Glass Ionomer-Based Pit and Fissure Sealants

2019 ◽  
pp. 175-188
Author(s):  
Meenakshi S. Kher ◽  
Ashwin Rao
Keyword(s):  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Fissure Sealants ◽  
Pit And Fissure Sealants

Bond strength of Bis-GMA and glass ionomer pit and fissure sealants using cyclic fatigue

1998 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 594-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasnain R. Dewji ◽  
James L. Drummond ◽  
Shahrbanoo Fadavi ◽  
Indru Punwani
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Cyclic Fatigue ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Fissure Sealants ◽  
Pit And Fissure Sealants

scholarly journals Comparative study of fluoride released and recharged from conventional pit and fissure sealants versus surface prereacted glass ionomer technology

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
RogelioJ Scougall-Vilchis ◽  
EliasNahum Salmerón-Valdés ◽  
Jorge Alanis-Tavira ◽  
RaúlAlberto Morales-Luckie
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Fissure Sealants ◽  
Pit And Fissure Sealants

scholarly journals Comparison of Caries Occurence Between Resin Based and Glass Ionomer Based Pit and Fissure Sealants in Young Permanent Molars After One Year Application

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 178
Author(s):  
Nila Kasuma ◽  
M. Biomed ◽  
Aida Fitriana ◽  
Fildzah Nurul Fajrin
Keyword(s):  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Test Methods ◽  
White Spot ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Fissure Sealants ◽  
Fissure Sealant ◽  
Pit And Fissure Sealants ◽  
Icdas Ii ◽  
One Year ◽  
Ionomer Cement

The use of anatomic grooves or pits and fissures on the occlusal top of permanent grinders retains food scraps and increases the formation of caries. Inserting and fastening these exposed regions with pit-and fissure sealants has the potential to avert the occurrence of these injuries in teeth. The tools used for such process have the shape of a resin based and a glass ionomer cement (referred to as GIC hereafter). This study aims to compare white spot index (ICDAS) after applying resin based and fissure sealant glass ionomer, and to determine the more efficient types of material over a long period of time method. This study uses experimental pre-test and post-test methods. The research population consists of grade I, II, and III elementary students from the Elementary School No.2, Central Cupak, Padang. Samples were obtained through purposive sampling. The research involves 2 types of sample each of which consists of 30 children who were given resin based sealant application as well as glass Ionomer. ICDAS-II index was used to assess white spot index following one year application. The research data was analyzed with SPSS Statistics through unpaired t-test. The result shows that there is no major distinction between resin based sealant application and glass ionomer cement following one year application(p = 0,23). This study concludes that resin based sealants and glass ionomer cement constitute valuable pit and fissure sealant materials. The reaction of these materials must be evaluated over a longer period to determine the mean retention period and to confirm if a new application is needed.

scholarly journals Retention evaluation of two glass ionomer cement sealants: six-month clinical follow-up

2015 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 301-308
Author(s):  
Alline FRAY ◽  
Thaís Manzano PARISOTTO ◽  
Gabriela Azevedo de Vasconcelos Cunha BONINI ◽  
Regina Maura Coli SIEGL ◽  
José Carlos Pettorossi IMPARATO
Keyword(s):  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Fissure Sealants ◽  
Pit And Fissure Sealants ◽  
Permanent Molars ◽  
Materials Used ◽  
Sealant Retention ◽  
First Permanent Molars ◽  
Ionomer Cement

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the retention of glass ionomer sealant, Vitro Molar(r) (DFL) and Ketac Molar Easy Mix(r) (3 m ESPE) as pit and fissure sealants on first permanent molars, fully or partially erupted. Methods: The study sample consisted of 412 molars, among 110 children. The sealant retention was evaluated after 6 months of the application. Results: The results were collected through digital photographs and the retention results were assessed by the following System: score 0 - total retention; score 1 - sealant present in more than 50% of the pit and fissure system; score 2 - sealant present in less than 50% of the pit and fissure system; score 3 - missing sealant. Regarding the presence of the sealants in less than 50% of the occlusal surface, lower percentages were found for the two materials used as follows: score score 2 - Vitro Molar(r) (9,52% examiner 1 and 11.9% examiner 2) and score 2 - Ketac Molar Easy Mix(r)(9.52% examiner 1 and 10.71% examiner 2). Approximately 90% of the teeth sealed with Ketac Molar Easy Mix(r)or Vitro Molar(r) presented total loss (score 3). Thus, there was no statistical difference between the materials and between the examiners (p>0.05). Conclusion: Therefore it was concluded that the sealant retention in the studied population was not satisfactory for any of the materials used.

scholarly journals Wear and superficial roughness of glass ionomer cements used as sealants, after simulated toothbrushing

2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 343-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Rios ◽  
Heitor Marques Honório ◽  
Paulo Amarante de Araújo ◽  
Maria Aparecida de Andrade Moreira Machado
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cements ◽  
Measuring Apparatus ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Fissure Sealants ◽  
Pit And Fissure Sealants ◽  
Resin Sealant

The purpose of this study was to evaluate, in vitro, the properties (wear and roughness) of glass ionomer cements that could influence their indication as pit and fissure sealants. The utilized materials were Fuji Plus, Ketac-Molar and Vitremer (in two different proportions: 1:1 and ¼:1). The resin-based sealant Delton was used as control. By means of an electronic balance (precision of 10-4 g), wear was measured in function of weight loss after simulated toothbrushing. Superficial roughness was determined by means of a surface roughness-measuring apparatus. The results revealed that diluted Vitremer and Fuji Plus were less resistant to toothbrushing abrasion and had the greatest increase in superficial roughness.Although in clinical situations luting or diluted ionomer cements are often utilized as alternatives to resin-based sealants, the resultsof this study revealed that the properties of those cements are worse than those of restorative ionomers, whichpresented results similar to those of the evaluated resin sealant.

Fuji III vs. Fuji VII Glass Ionomer Sealants – A Clinical Study

2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
B Kamala ◽  
Amitha Hegde
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Applications ◽  
Fluoride Release ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Fissure Sealants ◽  
Pit And Fissure Sealants ◽  
High Fluoride ◽  
Permanent Molars ◽  
One Year ◽  
The One ◽  
First Permanent Molars

Glass ionomer cements possess several properties that support their consideration in a wide variety of clinical applications including Pit and fissure sealants. The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate Fuji III and Fuji VII glass ionomer sealants in terms of retention, caries incidence and salivary fluoride release between two groups of children aged 6 and-8 years respectively. One hundred and ten first permanent molars were sealed and the clinical evaluation showed no incidence of caries. There was partial or complete retention of the sealant in 80% of the treated teeth in both groups at the one-year evaluation. Irrespective of the sealant used, the pattern of fluoride release remained consistent, with an initial high fluoride release followed by low prolonged leakage before returning to baseline value at the end of one year.

scholarly journals Pit and fissure sealants penetration capacity and their correlation with fissure morphology

2019 ◽  
Vol 92 ◽  
pp. S50-S54
Author(s):  
Alexandrina Muntean ◽  
Meda-Romana Simu ◽  
Raluca Suhani ◽  
Anca Stefania Mesaros
Keyword(s):  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Fissure Sealants ◽  
Depth Of Penetration ◽  
Fissure Sealant ◽  
Pit And Fissure Sealants ◽  
Group I ◽  
Occlusal Surfaces ◽  
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer

Background and aims. Pit and fissure sealant placement corresponds to an effective approach of the prevention of caries on occlusal surfaces. Fissure morphology and dental material characteristics are the key factors for sealant effectiveness. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the penetration ability of two commercially available pit and fissure sealants. Methods. Twenty sound human premolars extracted for orthodontic purpose have been sealed according to manufacturer’s instructions as follows: Group I (n=10), light-cured unfilled resin-based sealant, Admira Seal® (Voco GmbH); Group II (n=10), resin modified glass ionomer sealant without varnish, GC Fuji Triage® (GC Corporation). The teeth have been sectioned buccal-lingually in the middle of the occlusal surface, and the sections were examined at 40x with an inverted microscope. Results. Penetration of the sealants was found to be greater in U-type fissure pattern (91.69%) followed by V-type (75.42%), IK-type (71.24%) and then in I-type (63.98%). The depth of penetration of GC Fuji Triage® (82.85%) demonstrated to be superior to Admira Seal® (76.28%). Conclusion. U fissure design was more common than other fissure patterns and showed significantly higher penetration for the two type of sealants evaluated. Resin modified glass ionomer sealant used in the present study perform comparably with the filled resin sealant.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document