The Economics of Intangible Assets: From just Value-to-Value Creation

Author(s):  
Aicha Dif ◽  
Zahra Hamdani ◽  
Abdelbaki Benziane
2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
TÀNIA CRISTINA CHIARELLO ◽  
CAROLINE SULZBACH PLETSCH ◽  
ALINI DA SILVA ◽  
TARCISIO PEDRO DA SILVA

Intangible assets disclosure, even with recent obligation, has brought benefits to companiesvalue and financial performance assistance. This study aims at analyzing the relationshipbetween financial performance, intangible assets disclosure and value creation withinBrazilian and Chilean information technology companies. In order to carry out the survey adescriptive analysis through both documentary research and quantitative approach wasused. Descriptive statistics analysis, t-test and Pearson's correlation helped confirm thatChilean companies disclose more intangible assets and make greater value through reachinggood results in financial performance. Thus, the higher the financial performance, the greaterthe value creation, and the greater the intangible assets disclosure within Chileaninformation technology companies.


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rada Massingham ◽  
Peter Rex Massingham ◽  
John Dumay

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present a new learning and growth perspective for the balanced scorecard (BSC) that includes more specific measures of integrated thinking and value creation to help improve integrated reporting (<IR>). Practical, relevant definitions of these historically vague concepts may improve intangible asset disclosures (IAD) and increase uptake of the<IR> framework. Design/methodology/approach The paper is conceptual. The authors use organisational learning to theorise about the learning and growth perspective of the BSC, within the context of the practice of IAD. Findings Several criticisms of IAD, the<IR>framework and the BSC have acted as barriers to implementing the<IR>framework. The improved version of the BSC’s learning and growth perspective, presented in this paper, addresses those criticisms by redefining the concept of integrated thinking (learning) and more fully connecting that learning to future value creation (growth). The model is designed to be used in tandem with the<IR>framework to operationalise integrated thinking. A new BSC strategy map illustrates how this revised learning and growth perspective interacts with the other three BSC perspectives to create long-term shareholder value through the management and growth of knowledge within an organisation. Research limitations/implications Organisational learning is an important source of competitive advantage in the modern knowledge economy. Here, the authors encourage further debate on how to report and disclose information on intangible assets, driven by a new conceptual strategy for organisational learning that fully supports the BSC’s capacity to help integrated thinking and future value creation for the<IR>framework. Practical implications From its roots as a performance measurement system, the BSC has become a widely used strategy execution tool. The<IR>framework has struggled to gain traction, but still has value in exploring intangible assets and its disclosure from a systems thinking perspective. The model is designed to bring an explicit understanding of how to improve integrated thinking for the<IR>framework facilitating better measurement, management and reporting of human and structural capital. By doing so, the new model enables a firm to use the BSC to engage with<IR>more effectively, which should also be useful for practitioners given the widespread use of the BSC. Originality/value The analysis of the BSC’s learning and growth perspective reveals two dichotomies – one between resources and growth, and another between systems and capability. The revised perspective resolves these dichotomies with clear, forward-focused measures of learning and intangible asset growth, and multiple vertical and horizontal connections between the perspective’s four constructs. The authors demonstrate practical paths to value creation through a range of strategic impacts.


2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir SHATREVICH ◽  
Deniss ŠČEULOVS ◽  
Elina GAILE-SARKANE

The aim of this paper is to indicate the relations between company’s value added (VA) and intangible assets. Authors declare that Intellectual capital (IC) is one of the most relevant intangibles for a company, and the concept with measurement, and the relation with value creation is necessary for modern markets. Since relationship between IC elements and VA are complicated, this paper is aimed to create a usable dynamic model for building company’s value added through intellectual capital. The model is incorporating that outputs from IC elements are not homogeneously received and made some contributions to dynamic nature of IC relation and VA. Variables that will help companies to evaluate contribution of each element of IC are added to the model. This paper emphasizes the importance of a company’s IC and the positive interaction between them in generating profits for company.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 240-249
Author(s):  
Totok Dewayanto

Whenever a business enterprise is established, it employs a particular business model that describes the design or architecture of the value creation, delivery, and capture mechanisms it employs. The essence of a business model is in defining the manner by which the enterprise delivers value to customers, entices customers to pay for value, and converts those payments to profit. It thus reflects management’s hypothesis about what customers want, how they want it, and how the enterprise can organize to best meet those needs, get paid for doing so, and make a profit. There is currently significant debate worldwide regarding business reporting. The concept of the ‘business model’ has entered into the discourse, as has the concept of ‘integrated reporting’, adding to the established debate regarding accounting for intangible assets and, more generally, intellectual capital (IC). The purpose of this article is to understand the influence of business model on intellectual capital disclosure.


2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simona Survilaitė ◽  
Rima Tamošiūnienė ◽  
Vladimir Shatrevich

The importance of value creation in small and medium-sized business companies has always been in focus. The changing environment makes a strong impact on all companies all over the world. Nowadays, the value added, which is created by the company, not only depends on tangible but also on intangible assets. It is not enough just to manage internal resources to be efficient or generate high value added. Knowledge and information as an important tool for the management of the external environment have become a new factor of a company. Since elements of the intellectual capital system are intangible and hardly measurable in company’s value added, this paper aims to create a model for the analysis of the creation of a company’s value added through intellectual capital. Subsequent to the review of literature on value creation and management, the authors proposed a model for value creation through intermediate, which presented three main elements of value added creation.


Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 130
Author(s):  
Marcos Albuquerque Junior ◽  
José António Filipe ◽  
Paulo de Melo Neto ◽  
Cristiano da Silva

Recent research suggests that one of the main motivations for mergers and acquisitions is the attempt to acquire companies to incorporate intangible assets. Such assets provide important sources of sustainable competitive advantages and opportunities for growth. This article analyzes the strategies of engineering companies, as well as value creation in acquisition events of multinational companies, by using the study of the events method, providing an innovative way to be applied to this phenomenon. This method is used in our research to study the influence of the announcement of acquisitions on the abnormal accumulated returns of the acquiring companies, and is allowed to confirm that influence. In general, the average accumulated returns were positive and statistically significant in the three windows of the method, according to the significance tests used. The results validate the hypothesis that the events generate synergy gains for market players, emphasizing the importance of growth via acquisitions for the sector under analysis.


Author(s):  
Abdullahi Ali

Advancements in the global digital economy have resulted in high levels of profitability for enterprises operating within it. The digital economy is particularly challenging for tax authorities the world over, as it is characterised by an unparalleled reliance on intangible assets and a difficulty in determining the jurisdiction in which value creation occurs. It is against this backdrop that Kenya enacted the Finance Act 2019, that had amongst its objectives, the effective taxation on the consumption of cross-border digital supplies. The amendments are largely targeted at the taxation of imported digital supplies from foreign jurisdictions to final consumers in Kenya. They place the responsibility of tax assessment and remittance to the consumer of the service. This move presents a critical departure from the previous regime where the responsibility of Value Added Tax (VAT) assessment and remittance fell on the firms supplying the service squarely. This paper critically assesses the practical efficacy and inherent weaknesses arising from the potential implementation of the proposed amendments under the VAT Act and provides recommendations on the way forward.


Author(s):  
S. Faizova ◽  
M. Ivanova ◽  
S. Sannikova ◽  
O. Varyanichenko

The directions of improving the methodical principles of Balanced Scorecard as a system of strategic enterprise management have been highlighted. The need to avoid the simplified mechanistic dividing of the indicators into financial and non-financial ones has been substantiated; the authors have also disputed the corresponding binding of financial indicators mainly to tangible assets and financial strategic prospects, and non-financial indicators — to intangible assets and non-financial projections of the strategy. The criteria of strategic targeting, efficiency and functionality have been defined as key criteria in selecting the BSC metrics. The necessity and the possibility of integration of VBM and BSC concepts, which may be implemented through the company’s financial control panel by using VBM metrics, has been substantiated. The unified criteria for selecting VBM metrics for the financial perspective of BSC (i.e. to take into account the investors’ risk and intangible factors of creating the enterprise’s market value; to be easily calculated and efficient; to provide for cascading and motivation) have been determined and their respective comprehensive assessment has been made. The general structure of the investment-financial perspective on the strategy map of a value-based enterprise of MMC has been developed. One can highlight specific features of the management perspective of a value-based enterprise. Among them:the «investors» projection or the financial-investment projection serves as the starting point of the cascade of a company’s value creation; unlike the amorphous classical BSC, the proposed pattern is clearly subordinated to the main indicator (EV); the financial-investment projection is represented by a limited number of financial, mostly VBM indicators; the balance of traditional and new metrics; unlike the classic BSC technique, the template developed does not imply a mandatory quantitative predominance of non-financial indicators. On the basis of the analysis of interdependence of factors and indicators of the company’s market value (KPIs / CSFs) аbsence of a linear relationship between financial indicators — tangible assets — current cost factors — on the one hand and non-financial indicators — intangible assets — future value factors — on the other, is defined. The рossibility to use financial and non-financial indicators to measure both tangible and intangible assets as sources of market value creation is proved.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document