Assessment Literacy as Praxis: Mediating Teacher Knowledge of Assessment-for-Learning Practices

Author(s):  
Ofra Inbar-Lourie ◽  
Tziona Levi
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1646691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammadreza Nasr ◽  
Mohammad Sadegh Bagheri ◽  
Firooz Sadighi ◽  
Ehsan Rassaei ◽  
Jeroen van de Weijer

Author(s):  
Christine Browning ◽  
Alden Edson ◽  
Diane Rogers

This chapter focuses on how assessment for learning can be used to promote the development of student understanding of mathematics and mathematical practices as described in the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics while emphasizing the affordances of digital technologies. The mathematical focus centered on the families of functions connected to the mathematical practice of constructing viable arguments when using the digital technology tool, VoiceThread. The chapter describes an iterative model for implementing assessment for learning practices where VoiceThread gave voice to preservice teachers’ mathematical justifications. Findings are taken from a study set in an algebra course designed for preservice elementary teachers working towards a minor in mathematics. Preservice teachers noted the positive impacts of using VoiceThread in improving their justification skills and the benefits of assessment for learning practices on their learning process.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 137-161
Author(s):  
Jenny Poskitt ◽  

Building capability in assessment for learning is a goal of education systems internationally, though difficult for nations to successfully implement and sustain over time (Laveault & Allal, 2016). Evidence about the positive effects of assessment for learning practices on students’ learning and achievement is convincing, but implementation is made difficult by the realities for teachers to balance the multiple demands of pedagogy, curriculum and assessment, differentiated instruction, and time for professional learning


The purpose of this paper is to examine the promising contributions of the Concept Maps for Learning (CMfL) website to assessment for learning practices. The CMfL website generates concept maps from relatedness degree of concepts pairs through the Pathfinder Scaling Algorithm. This website also confirms the established principles of effective assessment for learning, for it is capable of automatically assessing students’ higher order knowledge, simultaneously identifying strengths and weaknesses, immediately providing useful feedback and being user-friendly. According to the default assessment plan, students first create concept maps on a particular subject and then they are given individualized visual feedback followed by associated instructional material (e.g., videos, website links, examples, problems, etc.) based on a comparison of their concept map and a subject matter expert’s map. After studying the feedback and instructional material, teachers can monitor their students’ progress by having them create revised concept maps. Therefore, we claim that the CMfL website may reduce the workload of teachers as well as provide immediate and delayed feedback on the weaknesses of students in different forms such as graphical and multimedia. For the following study, we will examine whether these promising contributions to assessment for learning are valid in a variety of subjects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document