Leaders for Tomorrow: Challenges for Military Leadership in the Age of Asymmetric Warfare

2021 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Bowman ◽  
Eric Bowman ◽  
Jordan B. Peterson ◽  
Daniel M. Higgins ◽  
Robert O. Pihl

1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Horvath ◽  
Jennifer Hedlund ◽  
Scott Snook ◽  
George B. Forsythe ◽  
Robert J. Sternberg

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (3/4) ◽  
pp. 153-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Therese Heltberg

Denne artikel omhandler optegninger af følelser i det militære ledelsesrum. Gennem en iagttagelse af tre udvalgte, empiriske case-temaer viser artiklen en udspænding imellem fordringer om at besidde og anvende emotionelle kompetencer i det militære ledelsesvirke og muligheder for at unddrage sig disse fordringer. Artiklen undersøger blandt andet, hvordan udvalgte ledelsesteknologier indgår i og bidrager til optegningerne. ENGELSK ABSTRACT: Therese Heltberg: Emotions in Military Leadership This article considers enactments of emotions in military leadership and command. It is based on three cases. The article points to some of the emotional demands on the military leader. It also demonstrates how military doctrines and procedures may enable a contextual suspension of these emotional demands. Keywords: military leadership, emotion work, feeling rules, emotional intelligence, management technologies.


This book explores contemporary civil-military relations in the United States. Much of the canonical literature on civil-military relations was either written during or references the Cold War, while other major research focuses on the post-Cold War era, or the first decade of the twenty-first century. A great deal has changed since then. This book considers the implications for civil-military relations of many of these changes. Specifically, it focuses on factors such as breakdowns in democratic and civil-military norms and conventions; intensifying partisanship and deepening political divisions in American society; as well as new technology and the evolving character of armed conflict. Chapters are organized around the principal actors in civil-military relations, and the book includes sections on the military, civilian leadership, and the public. It explores the roles and obligations of each. The book also examines how changes in contemporary armed conflict influence civil-military relations. Chapters in this section examine the cyber domain, grey zone operations, asymmetric warfare and emerging technology. The book thus brings the study of civil-military relations into the contemporary era, in which new geopolitical realities and the changing character of armed conflict combine with domestic political tensions to test, if not potentially redefine, those relations.


Author(s):  
David G. Morgan-Owen

Historians have argued that the British Army was afflicted with an insular focus on home defence in the late nineteenth century and that this preoccupation was evidence of the paucity of military strategic thought and the lack of co-operation and dialogue between the two services. This chapter challenges that viewpoint and argues that the military leadership was, in fact, consistently much more interested in preparing for operations overseas than it was in planning to prevent an invasion. The military authorities were only deflected from this aim by differences of opinion with the Admiralty on the application of naval power and on the Navy’s inability to commit to the safe passage of troops by sea, disagreements which obliged the War Office to limit the scope of its strategic discourse. This had significant implications for both military and imperial policy, particularly the defence of India.


Author(s):  
Paul Brooker ◽  
Margaret Hayward

The Conclusion points out that the preceding seven chapters’ examples and case studies have revealed some expected, and some unexpected conclusions. The six main cases revealed some expected uniformity in the leaders’ selection of rational methods. There was less uniformity, however, in the choice of the methods they emphasized, whether due to their personal preferences or to the circumstances they were facing. Two unexpected findings were the addition of a seventh appropriate rational method—learning—and the prevalence of dual-leadership teams. The conclusion goes on to suggest that this book’s theory and approach should be applied to versions of military leadership and to the political leadership of contemporary democracies.


2005 ◽  
Vol 92 (5) ◽  
pp. 637-642 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. E. Hinsley ◽  
P. A. E. Rosell ◽  
T. K. Rowlands ◽  
J. C. Clasper
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 0095327X2110068
Author(s):  
Sam R. Bell ◽  
K. Chad Clay ◽  
Ghashia Kiyani ◽  
Amanda Murdie

Do civil–military relations influence human rights practices? Building on principal–agent theory, we argue that civilian–military relations, instead of having an effect on mean levels of repression, will be associated with the dispersion in human rights practices. States where there is less control of the military or more conflict between civilian and military leadership will see a wider range of human rights practices. We test our hypotheses quantitatively on a global sample of countries, using updated data on civil–military relations and find evidence that civil–military conflict and lack of control increase the variance in human right practices.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document