Cross-Listing Effect and Domestic Stock Returns: Some Empirical Evidence

Author(s):  
Naliniprava Tripathy ◽  
Amit Tripathy ◽  
Deepak Tandon
1988 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon J. Alexander ◽  
Cheol S. Eun ◽  
S. Janakiramanan

2013 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 489-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Halling ◽  
Pamela C. Moulton ◽  
Marios Panayides

AbstractThe trading of shares of the same firm in multiple markets has become common over the last 30 years, but there is little empirical evidence on the extent to which investors actively exploit multimarket environments. We introduce a volume-based measure of multimarket trading to address this question. Analyzing a large set of cross-listed firms, we find higher multimarket trading among markets with similar designs and strong enforcement of insider trading laws and for firms with higher institutional ownership. These findings are important for firms evaluating the benefits of cross listing and for markets competing for order flow.


2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (02) ◽  
pp. 1850010
Author(s):  
SILVIA BRESSAN ◽  
ALEX WEISSENSTEINER

This paper studies to what extent bank-specific characteristics relate to stock return skewness. The main finding is that stock return skewness decreases significantly in bank size, measured in terms of total assets, i.e stocks of large banks are less skewed than those of small banks. This result holds for backward-looking skewness computed using the past stock returns, as well as for forward-looking skewness extracted from stock options. We interpret the empirical evidence by arguing that bank size increases the likelihood to have severe losses, to the point that investors expect to be compensated by receiving higher expected returns.


Author(s):  
Horace Yeung

This chapter examines the potential discrepancies in the regulation applied to overseas issuers, as opposed to domestic issuers, of four leading financial centers. They are New York, London, Hong Kong, and Singapore. It consists of three substantive sections. The first section will reviews existing literature and empirical evidence concerning the motivations and current state of cross-listing. The second section examines the listing route for an overseas issuer and inquires how it might differ from a domestic listing in the host country. This chapter particularly concerns the potential discrepancies of rules between a foreign listing and a domestic listing and asks if those discrepancies would lead to better or inferior investor protection. The third section examines the continuing regulation of foreign-listed companies, reviewing some regulatory concerns involving cross-listed companies and discussing what can be done to curb the problems, for instance, through regulatory cooperation between home and host regulators.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document