Digital View on the Financial Statements’ Consolidation in Russian Public Sector

2018 ◽  
pp. 125-136
Author(s):  
Tatiana Antipova
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Financial Statements

The Reporting Entity in Private-Public Accounting Harmonisation. Is Control Enough for the Local Government Consolidated Financial Statements?

2017 ◽  
pp. 5-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristian Carini ◽  
Laura Rocca ◽  
Claudio Teodori ◽  
Monica Veneziani
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Local Government ◽  
Accounting Standards ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Consolidated Financial Statements ◽  
The Public ◽  
Financial Accountability ◽  
Public Sector Accounting ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Reporting Entity

The European Commission initiated a discussion on the expediency of using the International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS), based on the IAS/IFRS, as a common base for harmonizing the public sector accounting systems of the member states. However, literature suggests that accounting is not neutral with respect to the economic, social and political dimensions. In the perspective of evolution of the accounting regulation outlined, balanced between accountability, with the need to represent phenomena for reporting pur-poses, and decisionmaking issues, which concentrates on the quantitative importance of the values, the paper aims to analyse the effects of the application of different criteria for the definition of the reporting entity of the local government consolidated financial statements (CFS). The Italian PCA 4/4, the test of control and the financial accountability approaches are examined. The evidence that emerged from the case studies examined identifies several criticalities in the Italian PCA 4/4 and support the thesis that the financial accountability approach is more effective in providing a complete representation of the public resources entrusted to and managed by the group, whereas the control approach better approximates quantification of the group results in terms of central government surveillance. The analysis highlights the importance of the post implementation review period and the opportunity to contextualize the adoption of the consolidated financial statement in the broader spectrum of the accounting harmonization process, participating in the process of definition of the European Public Sector Accounting Standards (EPSAS).

Comparison of the perception of overt and covert options in IPSAS financial statements by intergovernmental organizations

Tékhne ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-39
Author(s):  
Berit Adam
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
European Commission ◽  
Accounting Standards ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Criminal Court ◽  
Intergovernmental Organizations ◽  
Accounting System ◽  
Accrual Accounting ◽  
Public Sector Accounting ◽  
Primary Reference

AbstractSince 2012, the European Commission has embarked on the ambitious project to harmonize public sector accounting rules on all levels of government within Europe, mainly to improve the quality as well as the comparability of financial data. Although International Public Sector Accounting Standards were deemed not to be suitable for a simple take-over because of various reasons, they nevertheless shall function as a primary reference point for developing European Public Sector Accounting Standards. A total of 21 out of 28 central governments have already reformed their accounting standards to accrual accounting, and some of them have also relied on IPSAS in this exercise. Apart from governments, various international and supranational governmental organizations have also since the end of the 2000’s been reforming their accounting system to accrual accounting, and have in the same way relied on existing IPSAS. This paper explores accounting practices found in ten intergovernmental organizations (Commonwealth Secretariat, Council of Europe, European Commission, IAEA, INTERPOL, ITER, NAPMA, OECD, International Criminal Court, WFP) whose statements are prepared in compliance with IPSAS. It analyzes how overt and covert options contained in IPSAS with relevance to the activities of intergovernmental organizations are exercised and evaluates in which areas of accounting material differences in accounting practices can be found, which may hinder the comparability of financial statements prepared on the basis of IPSAS.

Federal public finance accounting standard “Employee Payments”

2020 ◽  
pp. 5-10
Author(s):  
Olga Shinkareva
Keyword(s):  
Public Finance ◽  
Public Sector ◽  
Financial Reporting ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Employee Benefits ◽  
Reporting Standard ◽  
Accounting Standard ◽  
Disclosure Of Information

The article is devoted to the analysis of the Federal Accounting Standard of Public Finance “Payments to Personnel”, which will be applied in the conduct of accounting and reporting from January 1, 2021, including medical state and municipal institutions. The article considers the main provisions of this standard — peculiarities of recognition and evaluation of objects of personnel benefits accounting, termination of their recognition, as well as disclosure of information on objects of personnel benefits accounting in accounting financial statements. This standard is compared with the International Public Sector Financial Reporting Standard 39 “Employee Benefits”

Developments and challenges in public sector accounting

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 345-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Félix Madrid García
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Role Model ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
The Public ◽  
Additional Information ◽  
Management Indicators ◽  
Fixed Assets ◽  
Public Sector Accounting ◽  
Accounting Convergence

What could be dubbed traditional public sector accounting was adequate for the public sector as it existed up to the late 1980s. When it became evident that this type of accounting no longer sufficed, attention turned to seeking a role model in business accounting that differed significantly from public sector accounting. Despite the move of public sector accounting towards business accounting practices, some issues still remain unresolved. The accounting treatment of fixed assets is the question which has perhaps generated the most literature. Today much ground has been covered; however, to be modern and effective, public sector accounting has still to grapple with three important challenges: standardisation and accounting convergence; consolidation of financial statements; and management indicators and additional information for disclosure.

Guest editorialHappy endings and successful stories in public sector financial management: a lesson drawing perspective

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 393-406
Author(s):  
Sandra Cohen ◽  
Francesca Manes-Rossi ◽  
Isabel Brusca ◽  
Eugenio Caperchione
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Financial Management ◽  
Local Governments ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Special Issue ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Public Financial Management ◽  
Political Implications ◽  
Public Sector Organizations ◽  
And Performance

PurposePublic financial management has been characterized by the implementation of several innovations and reforms that embrace different areas and scope. These reforms aim at expenditure rationalization and efficiency enhancement, as well as the improvement of accountability and performance. Despite research having already paid attention to these innovations and reforms, the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats empirically faced by public sector organizations still need to be investigated. This editorial introduces the special issue by emphasizing on the lessons that can be learned from past reform experiences.Design/methodology/approachThe editorial synthesizes some of the findings of the previous literature and evidences the necessity of both successful and unsuccessful stories, presenting a future agenda of research which emphasizes the use of case studies as a suitable method to get insights out of multiple experiences.FindingsThe four articles presented in this special issue, covering the topics of accrual accounting adoption, the use of financial statements by councilors, the use of performance information by politicians and the outsourcing of auditing in local governments, provide an overview of the efforts and challenges faced by public administrations by analyzing the influence of the institutional context, the relevance of political implications and their practical footprint.OriginalityIn this special issue, four successful stories that touch upon multiple facets of public financial management in different country contexts are discussed, and they signal important takeaway messages for further reforms.

Some Questions of Introduction of Federal Financial Accounting Standards in Russian Public Sector

Auditor ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (9) ◽  
pp. 3-10
Author(s):  
Е. Смирнов ◽  
E. Smirnov
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Asset Management ◽  
Accounting Standards ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
Financial Accounting ◽  
The Russian Federation

Efficiency of asset management highly depends on reliability, completeness and timeliness of information about the items of accounting, received by preparers of financial statements. In this article, some matters of assets initial recognition and subsequent accounting are analysed in their connection with peculiarities of registry accounting of state property items in the Russian Federation public sector.

scholarly journals Exemptions Resulting from the International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) and European Standards for Intangible Investment, Inventories and Personnel Expenditures in Public Entities

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-130
Author(s):  
Corina Enache
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Accounting Standards ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
General Purpose ◽  
Employee Benefits ◽  
International Accounting Standards ◽  
Adoption And Implementation ◽  
Public Sector Accounting ◽  
Personnel Expenses ◽  
European Standards

Abstract Simultaneously with the globalization of economies, it was necessary the adoption and implementation of international accounting standards for the public sector also. In 1996 a set of accounting standards for public sector entities was developed, namely International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS). After 31st July 1998, 32 IPSAS standards, mostly inspired by IASs, centered on model and engagement-based accounting, were issued. IPSAS 1 – Presentation of financial statements relating to the place of intangible assets, inventories and personnel expenses in the content and format of the financial statements is applied to all general purpose financial statements realized under accrual accounting. The IPSAS 12 – Inventory objective is to state the stock accounting treatment. The IPSAS 25 objective – Employee benefits is to state the employee benefits from an accounting perspective.

scholarly journals UPAYA PENERAPAN AKRUAL DAN PEROLEHAN OPINI WTP DI KOTA PEKALONGAN DARI KACAMATA KURT LEWIN

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 516-536
Author(s):  
Riza Muttaqin ◽  
Ali Djamhuri ◽  
Yeney Widya Prihatiningtias
Keyword(s):  
Organizational Change ◽  
Public Sector ◽  
Change Theory ◽  
Financial Statements ◽  
City Government ◽  
Organizational Changes ◽  
Accrual Accounting ◽  
Audit Opinion ◽  
Kurt Lewin ◽  
The Government

The aim of this research is to reveal and describe the organizational change occured on Pekalongan City Government in implementing public sector accrual accounting and attaining unqualified audit opinion as perceived from the aspects of readiness and strategy implementation by the government based on movement stages following to Lewin’s Organizational Change Theory (1951). The results showed that the change from cash to accrual accounting as well as strategy to achieve unqualified audit opinion is a form of pressure and a process that is deliberately done in order to increase the accountability of the financial statements to be usable for decision-making. The goverment officials have shown resistance and negative impressions to implement of accrual accounting and strategy to achieve unqualified audit opinion. Preparations to implement accrual accounting and strategy to achieve unqualified audit opinion are expected to minimize the attitude of resistance so that the organizational changes can be successful. Preparations to implement of accrual accounting and  the strategy to achieve unqualified audit opinion are conducted by issuing Perwal. No. 34 and No. 35 2014, establishing SIMDA and SIMBADA, managing asset, defining a target in its RPJM, following up the BPK’s recommendation, and maintaining common commitment as public sector institution.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document