Algebraic Thinking with and without Algebraic Representation: A Pathway for Learning

Author(s):  
Murray S. Britt ◽  
Kathryn C. Irwin
Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 518
Author(s):  
Natividad Adamuz-Povedano ◽  
Elvira Fernández-Ahumada ◽  
M. Teresa García-Pérez ◽  
Jesús Montejo-Gámez

Traditionally, the teaching and learning of algebra has been addressed at the beginning of secondary education with a methodological approach that broke traumatically into a mathematical universe until now represented by numbers, with bad consequences. It is important, then, to find methodological alternatives that allow the parallel development of arithmetical and algebraic thinking from the first years of learning. This article begins with a review of a series of theoretical foundations that support a methodological proposal based on the use of specific manipulative materials that foster a deep knowledge of the decimal number system, while verbalizing and representing quantitative situations that underline numerical relationships and properties and patterns of numbers. Developing and illustrating this approach is the main purpose of this paper. The proposal has been implemented in a group of 25 pupils in the first year of primary school. Some observed milestones are presented and analyzed. In the light of the results, this well-planned early intervention contains key elements to initiate algebraic thinking through the development of number sense, naturally enhancing the translation of purely arithmetical situations into the symbolic language characteristic of algebraic thinking.


2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 1-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beste Kamali ◽  
Manfred Krifka

AbstractMuch recent research has recognized the importance of focus and contrastive topic in assertions for discourse coherence. However, with few exceptions, it has been neglected that focus and contrastive topic also occur in questions, and have a similar role in establishing coherence. We propose a framework of dynamic interpretation based on the notion of Commitment Spaces that show that a uniform interpretation of focus and contrastive topic is possible. The algebraic representation format is rich enough so that a separate introduction of discourse trees is not necessary. The paper discusses these phenomena for Turkish, a language with an explicit focus marker for polar and alternative questions, which distinguishes focus from contrastive topic.


2014 ◽  
Vol 107 (6) ◽  
pp. 432-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara M. Kinach

The meaningful use of symbols links context and generality.


2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedetto Di Paola ◽  
◽  
Onofrio Rosario Battaglia ◽  
Claudio Fazio ◽  
◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 895 ◽  
pp. 012089
Author(s):  
M Muthmainnah ◽  
N Priatna ◽  
B A Priatna
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document