Observations of Surface Velocity Fields

Author(s):  
Robert F. Howard
2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gloria Koenigsberger ◽  
Edmundo Moreno ◽  
David Harrington ◽  
Ivan Hubeny ◽  
James M. Stone ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 2115-2132
Author(s):  
Maximillian Van Wyk de Vries ◽  
Andrew D. Wickert

Abstract. We present Glacier Image Velocimetry (GIV), an open-source and easy-to-use software toolkit for rapidly calculating high-spatial-resolution glacier velocity fields. Glacier ice velocity fields reveal flow dynamics, ice-flux changes, and (with additional data and modelling) ice thickness. Obtaining glacier velocity measurements over wide areas with field techniques is labour intensive and often associated with safety risks. The recent increased availability of high-resolution, short-repeat-time optical imagery allows us to obtain ice displacement fields using “feature tracking” based on matching persistent irregularities on the ice surface between images and hence, surface velocity over time. GIV is fully parallelized and automatically detects, filters, and extracts velocities from large datasets of images. Through this coupled toolchain and an easy-to-use GUI, GIV can rapidly analyse hundreds to thousands of image pairs on a laptop or desktop computer. We present four example applications of the GIV toolkit in which we complement a glaciology field campaign (Glaciar Perito Moreno, Argentina) and calculate the velocity fields of small mid-latitude (Glacier d'Argentière, France) and tropical glaciers (Volcán Chimborazo, Ecuador), as well as very large glaciers (Vavilov Ice Cap, Russia). Fully commented MATLAB code and a stand-alone app for GIV are available from GitHub and Zenodo (see https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4624831, Van Wyk de Vries, 2021a).


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 1062 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Lüttig ◽  
Niklas Neckel ◽  
Angelika Humbert

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvano Fortunato Dal Sasso ◽  
Alonso Pizarro ◽  
Salvatore Manfreda

<p>In the last years, new technologies have been developed to monitor rivers in a real-time framework opening new opportunities and challenges for the research community and practitioners. Acquiring data in open flow conditions can be performed through the use of Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) to derive surface velocity fields and in consequence, river discharge. Significant work has been done to investigate the reliability of image-velocimetry techniques using numerical simulations and laboratory flume experiments, but, to date, the effects of environmental factors on velocity estimates are not addressed adequately. In this context, a critical variable is represented by the number of particles transiting on the water surface (defined as seeding density) during field surveys and their challenging dynamics along the cross-section, on both time and space. Seeding density has a significant effect on surface velocity estimation and river discharge accuracy. The goal of this study was, therefore, to evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of LSPIV and PTV techniques under different seeding and flow conditions using several footages acquired employing UASs. To this purpose, the seeding behaviour during the whole acquisition time was examined for each case study focusing on the quantification of essential variables such as seeding density, average tracers’ dimension, coefficient of variation of tracers’ area, and spatial dispersion of them in the field of view. For each case study, both image-velocimetry techniques have been applied considering several different sets of images to locally measure the accuracy of velocity estimations in challenging seeding conditions. Results show that the local seeding density, tracers’ dimension and their spatial distribution can strongly influence the reconstruction of velocity fields in natural stream reaches. Therefore, prior knowledge of seeding characteristics in the field can deal with the choice of the optimal image-velocimetry technique to use and the related setting parameters.</p>


Solar Physics ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 130 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 295-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. F. Howard ◽  
J. W. Harvey ◽  
S. Forgach

2010 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 564-579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Nencioli ◽  
Changming Dong ◽  
Tommy Dickey ◽  
Libe Washburn ◽  
James C. McWilliams

Abstract Automated eddy detection methods are fundamental tools to analyze eddy activity from the large datasets derived from satellite measurements and numerical model simulations. Existing methods are either based on the distribution of physical parameters usually computed from velocity derivatives or on the geometry of velocity streamlines around minima or maxima of sea level anomaly. A new algorithm was developed based exclusively on the geometry of the velocity vectors. Four constraints characterizing the spatial distribution of the velocity vectors around eddy centers were derived from the general features associated with velocity fields in the presence of eddies. The grid points in the domain for which these four constraints are satisfied are detected as eddy centers. Eddy sizes are computed from closed contours of the streamfunction field, and eddy tracks are retrieved by comparing the distribution of eddy centers at successive time steps. The results were validated against manually derived eddy fields. Two parameters in the algorithm can be modified by the users to optimize its performance. The algorithm is applied to both a high-resolution model product and high-frequency radar surface velocity fields in the Southern California Bight.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document