Targeting Protein-Protein Interactions in Small GTPases

2018 ◽  
pp. 317-329
Author(s):  
Jiahui Liu ◽  
Ning Kang ◽  
Yaxue Zhao ◽  
Mingyan Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Small Gtpases ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions

Exploring Proteomic Drug Targets, Therapeutic Strategies and Protein - Protein Interactions in Cancer: Mechanistic View

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 430-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khalid Bashir Dar ◽  
Aashiq Hussain Bhat ◽  
Shajrul Amin ◽  
Syed Anjum ◽  
Bilal Ahmad Reshi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
High Throughput Screening ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Cancer Therapeutics ◽  
Adaptor Proteins ◽  
Therapeutic Strategies ◽  
Small Gtpases ◽  
Beta Catenin ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Apoptosis Protein

Protein-Protein Interactions (PPIs) drive major signalling cascades and play critical role in cell proliferation, apoptosis, angiogenesis and trafficking. Deregulated PPIs are implicated in multiple malignancies and represent the critical targets for treating cancer. Herein, we discuss the key protein-protein interacting domains implicated in cancer notably PDZ, SH2, SH3, LIM, PTB, SAM and PH. These domains are present in numerous enzymes/kinases, growth factors, transcription factors, adaptor proteins, receptors and scaffolding proteins and thus represent essential sites for targeting cancer. This review explores the candidature of various proteins involved in cellular trafficking (small GTPases, molecular motors, matrix-degrading enzymes, integrin), transcription (p53, cMyc), signalling (membrane receptor proteins), angiogenesis (VEGFs) and apoptosis (BCL-2family), which could possibly serve as targets for developing effective anti-cancer regimen. Interactions between Ras/Raf; X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP)/second mitochondria-derived activator of caspases (Smac/DIABLO); Frizzled (FRZ)/Dishevelled (DVL) protein; beta-catenin/T Cell Factor (TCF) have also been studied as prospective anticancer targets. Efficacy of diverse molecules/ drugs targeting such PPIs although evaluated in various animal models/cell lines, there is an essential need for human-based clinical trials. Therapeutic strategies like the use of biologicals, high throughput screening (HTS) and fragment-based technology could play an imperative role in designing cancer therapeutics. Moreover, bioinformatic/computational strategies based on genome sequence, protein sequence/structure and domain data could serve as competent tools for predicting PPIs. Exploring hot spots in proteomic networks represents another approach for developing targetspecific therapeutics. Overall, this review lays emphasis on a productive amalgamation of proteomics, genomics, biochemistry, and molecular dynamics for successful treatment of cancer.

scholarly journals GRASP and IPCEF Promote ARF-to-Rac Signaling and Cell Migration by Coordinating the Association of ARNO/cytohesin 2 with Dock180

2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 562-571 ◽  
Author(s):  
David T. White ◽  
Katie M. McShea ◽  
Myriam A. Attar ◽  
Lorraine C. Santy
Keyword(s):  
Cell Migration ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Cell Shape ◽  
Coiled Coil ◽  
Small Gtpases ◽  
Accessory Proteins ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Coiled Coil Domain ◽  
The Many ◽  
Dependent Processes

ARFs are small GTPases that regulate vesicular trafficking, cell shape, and movement. ARFs are subject to extensive regulation by a large number of accessory proteins. The many different accessory proteins are likely specialized to regulate ARF signaling during particular processes. ARNO/cytohesin 2 is an ARF-activating protein that promotes cell migration and cell shape changes. We report here that protein–protein interactions mediated by the coiled-coil domain of ARNO are required for ARNO induced motility. ARNO lacking the coiled-coil domain does not promote migration and does not induce ARF-dependent Rac activation. We find that the coiled-coil domain promotes the assembly of a multiprotein complex containing both ARNO and the Rac-activating protein Dock180. Knockdown of either GRASP/Tamalin or IPCEF, two proteins known to bind to the coiled-coil of ARNO, prevents the association of ARNO and Dock180 and prevents ARNO-induced Rac activation. These data suggest that scaffold proteins can regulate ARF dependent processes by biasing ARF signaling toward particular outputs.

scholarly journals Conformationally variable Rab protein surface regions mapped by limited proteolysis and homology modelling

1998 ◽  
Vol 336 (2) ◽  
pp. 461-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lydia NIKOLOVA ◽  
Kizhake SOMAN ◽  
Jeffry C. NICHOLS ◽  
D. Sundarsingh DANIEL ◽  
Burton F. DICKEY ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Peptide Mapping ◽  
Homology Modelling ◽  
Limited Proteolysis ◽  
Variable Region ◽  
Peptide Sequencing ◽  
Small Gtpases ◽  
Rab Proteins ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Rab Protein

Tryptic proteolysis of the small GTPases Rab4 and Rab5 is a multi-step, nucleotide-dependent process. Using N-terminal peptide sequencing, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time-of-flight MS and molecular modelling, we identified the three initial sites of proteolysis in Rab5 as Arg-4, Arg-81 and Arg-197. Arg-4 and Arg-81 lie within regions previously implicated in Rab5 endocytic function, and Arg-197 lies in a region involved in membrane targeting. Topologically, Arg-81 lies within the conformationally variable Switch II region shown to be important for protein–protein interactions of other GTPases. Homology modelling studies on Rab5 indicate that the Arg-81 side chain is buried in the Rab5 GTP conformation, but is solvent-accessible in the GDP conformation, explaining the dependence of proteolysis on nucleotides. Peptide mapping of Rab4 was performed to take advantage of additional scissile bonds within Switch II to determine more precisely the limits of the nucleotide-dependent protease-accessible region. The Rab4 cleavage sites corresponded to Arg-81 and Pro-87 of Rab5, and taken together with the finding that Rab5 was not cleaved at Arg-91 this analysis defines an eight-residue surface-exposed conformationally variable region lying in the centre of Switch II. A sequence comparison of Rab proteins shows these eight residues to have a loosely conserved motif that we term Switch II(v) for its relative variability. C-terminal to Switch II(v) is a highly conserved Rab-specific YYRGA motif that we term Switch II(c) for its constant sequence. N-terminal to Switch II(v) is a sequence-invariant G-domain involved in nucleotide binding and hydrolysis. We propose that the Rab Switch II(v) region imparts specificity to nucleotide-dependent protein–protein interactions.

Protein-protein interactions of the p53 family with the Bcl-2 family in hepatocellular carcinoma

2011 ◽  
Vol 49 (08) ◽  
Author(s):  
LC König ◽  
M Meinhard ◽  
C Sandig ◽  
MH Bender ◽  
A Lovas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
P53 Family

Partial Purification of a Specific Plasminogen Activator from Porcine Parotid Glands

1974 ◽  
Vol 31 (03) ◽  
pp. 403-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terence Cartwright
Keyword(s):  
Nucleic Acid ◽  
Salivary Glands ◽  
Plasminogen Activator ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Partial Purification ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Parotid Glands ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Preliminary Characterization ◽  
Specific Inhibitors

SummaryA method is described for the extraction with buffers of near physiological pH of a plasminogen activator from porcine salivary glands. Substantial purification of the activator was achieved although this was to some extent complicated by concomitant extraction of nucleic acid from the glands. Preliminary characterization experiments using specific inhibitors suggested that the activator functioned by a similar mechanism to that proposed for urokinase, but with some important kinetic differences in two-stage assay systems. The lack of reactivity of the pig gland enzyme in these systems might be related to the tendency to protein-protein interactions observed with this material.

Target-Templated de novo Design of Macrocyclic D-/L-Peptides: Inhibitors of the PD-1/PD-L1 Interaction

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salvador Guardiola ◽  
Monica Varese ◽  
Xavier Roig ◽  
Jesús Garcia ◽  
Ernest Giralt
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Cyclic Peptides ◽  
General Framework ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Inhibitory Effect ◽  
Original Text ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Retraction Notice ◽  
Pharmaceutical Properties

<p>NOTE: This preprint has been retracted by consensus from all authors. See the retraction notice in place above; the original text can be found under "Version 1", accessible from the version selector above.</p><p><br></p><p>------------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p><br></p><p>Peptides, together with antibodies, are among the most potent biochemical tools to modulate challenging protein-protein interactions. However, current structure-based methods are largely limited to natural peptides and are not suitable for designing target-specific binders with improved pharmaceutical properties, such as macrocyclic peptides. Here we report a general framework that leverages the computational power of Rosetta for large-scale backbone sampling and energy scoring, followed by side-chain composition, to design heterochiral cyclic peptides that bind to a protein surface of interest. To showcase the applicability of our approach, we identified two peptides (PD-<i>i</i>3 and PD-<i>i</i>6) that target PD-1, a key immune checkpoint, and work as protein ligand decoys. A comprehensive biophysical evaluation confirmed their binding mechanism to PD-1 and their inhibitory effect on the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction. Finally, elucidation of their solution structures by NMR served as validation of our <i>de novo </i>design approach. We anticipate that our results will provide a general framework for designing target-specific drug-like peptides.<i></i></p>

Target-Templated de novo Design of Macrocyclic D-/L-Peptides: Inhibitors of the PD-1/PD-L1 Interaction

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salvador Guardiola ◽  
Monica Varese ◽  
Xavier Roig ◽  
Jesús Garcia ◽  
Ernest Giralt
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Cyclic Peptides ◽  
General Framework ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Inhibitory Effect ◽  
Original Text ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Retraction Notice ◽  
Pharmaceutical Properties

<p>NOTE: This preprint has been retracted by consensus from all authors. See the retraction notice in place above; the original text can be found under "Version 1", accessible from the version selector above.</p><p><br></p><p>------------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p><br></p><p>Peptides, together with antibodies, are among the most potent biochemical tools to modulate challenging protein-protein interactions. However, current structure-based methods are largely limited to natural peptides and are not suitable for designing target-specific binders with improved pharmaceutical properties, such as macrocyclic peptides. Here we report a general framework that leverages the computational power of Rosetta for large-scale backbone sampling and energy scoring, followed by side-chain composition, to design heterochiral cyclic peptides that bind to a protein surface of interest. To showcase the applicability of our approach, we identified two peptides (PD-<i>i</i>3 and PD-<i>i</i>6) that target PD-1, a key immune checkpoint, and work as protein ligand decoys. A comprehensive biophysical evaluation confirmed their binding mechanism to PD-1 and their inhibitory effect on the PD-1/PD-L1 interaction. Finally, elucidation of their solution structures by NMR served as validation of our <i>de novo </i>design approach. We anticipate that our results will provide a general framework for designing target-specific drug-like peptides.<i></i></p>

Probing the 14-3-3 Isoform-Specificity Profile of Interactions Stabilized by Fusicoccin A

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Frederich ◽  
Ananya Sengupta ◽  
Josue Liriano ◽  
Ewa A. Bienkiewicz ◽  
Brian G. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Neurological Diseases ◽  
Adapter Proteins ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Individual Client ◽  
Isoform Specificity ◽  
Fusicoccin A

Fusicoccin A (FC) is a fungal phytotoxin that stabilizes protein–protein interactions (PPIs) between 14-3-3 adapter proteins and their phosphoprotein interaction partners. In recent years, FC has emerged as an important chemical probe of human 14-3-3 PPIs implicated in cancer and neurological diseases. These previous studies have established the structural requirements for FC-induced stabilization of 14-3-3·client phosphoprotein complexes; however, the effect of different 14-3-3 isoforms on FC activity has not been systematically explored. This is a relevant question for the continued development of FC variants because there are seven distinct isoforms of 14-3-3 in humans. Despite their remarkable sequence and structural similarities, a growing body of experimental evidence supports both tissue-specific expression of 14-3-3 isoforms and isoform-specific functions <i>in vivo</i>. Herein, we report the isoform-specificity profile of FC <i>in vitro</i>using recombinant human 14-3-3 isoforms and a focused library of fluorescein-labeled hexaphosphopeptides mimicking the C-terminal 14-3-3 recognition domains of client phosphoproteins targeted by FC in cell culture. Our results reveal modest isoform preferences for individual client phospholigands and demonstrate that FC differentially stabilizes PPIs involving 14-3-3s. Together, these data provide strong motivation for the development of non-natural FC variants with enhanced selectivity for individual 14-3-3 isoforms.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document