scholarly journals Trigeminal Neuralgia

2021 ◽  
pp. 531-546
Author(s):  
Kandasamy Ganesan ◽  
Asha Thomson
Keyword(s):  
Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Trigeminal Nerve ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Gamma Knife Radiosurgery ◽  
Clinical History ◽  
Sensory Innervation ◽  
Root Entry Zone ◽  
Course Of Action ◽  
Set Up ◽  
Self Help Groups

AbstractNeuralgia can be defined as paroxysmal, intense intermittent pain that is usually confined to specific nerve branches to the head and neck. The trigeminal nerve is responsible for sensory innervation of the scalp, face and mouth, and damage or disease to this nerve may result in sensory loss, pain or both. >85% of cases of Trigeminal Neuralgia are of the classic type known as Classical Trigeminal Neuralgia (CTN), while the remaining cases can be separated to secondary Trigeminal Neuralgia (STN). STN is thought to be initiated by multiple sclerosis or a space-occupying lesion affecting the trigeminal nerve, whereas the leading cause of CTN is known to be compression of the trigeminal nerve in the region of the dorsal root entry zone by a blood vessel. There is no guaranteed cure for the condition of Trigeminal Neuralgia, but there are several treatment options that can give relief. In this chapter, we review the common neuralgias occurring within the oral and maxillofacial region with special emphasis on Trigeminal Neuralgia. We will discuss the historical evolution of treatment including the medical and surgical modalities with the use of current literature and newer developments. It has been highlighted that the first line of treatment for trigeminal neuralgia is still pharmacological treatment, with Carbamazepine and Oxcarbazepine being the first choice. Possible surgical methods of treatment are discussed within this chapter including modalities such as Microvascular Decompression, Gamma Knife Radiosurgery and Peripheral Neurectomy. As an OMF surgeon, it is important to obtain a good clinical history to rule out other pathology including dental focus. Many clinicians involved ranging from primary care dentists and doctors to secondary care (neurologists, Oral Medicine, OMFS, etc.) to deliver the appropriate first course of action, which is the medical management. The management of TN patients should be carried out in a multidisciplinary setting to allow the patients to choose the best-suited option for them. It is also important to set up self-help groups to enable them to share knowledge and information for themselves and their family members for the best possible outcomes.

scholarly journals Trigeminal Neuralgia: Basic and Clinical Aspects

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-119
Author(s):  
Erika Ivanna Araya ◽  
Rafaela Franco Claudino ◽  
Elcio Juliato Piovesan ◽  
Juliana Geremias Chichorro
Keyword(s):  
Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Trigeminal Nerve ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Cranial Nerves ◽  
Sensory Innervation ◽  
Clinical Aspects ◽  
Neurovascular Compression ◽  
Drug Of Choice ◽  
Root Entry Zone ◽  
The 1960S

The trigeminal nerve is the largest of all cranial nerves. It has three branches that provide the main sensory innervation of the anterior two-thirds of the head and face. Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is characterized by sudden, severe, brief, and stabbing recurrent episodes of facial pain in one or more branches of the trigeminal nerve. Pain attacks can occur spontaneously or can be triggered by non-noxious stimuli, such as talking, eating, washing the face, brushing teeth, shaving, a light touch or even a cool breeze. In addition to pain attacks, a proportion of the patients also experience persistent background pain, which along with autonomic signs and prolonged disease duration, represent predictors of worse treatment outcomes. It is now widely accepted that the presence of a neurovascular compression at the trigeminal root entry zone is an anatomic abnormality with a high correlation with classical TN. However, TN may be related to other etiologies, thus presenting different and/or additional features. Since the 1960s, the anticonvulsant carbamazepine is the drug of choice for TN treatment. Although anti-epileptic drugs are commonly used to treat neuropathic pain in general, the efficacy of carbamazepine has been largely limited to TN. Carbamazepine, however, is associated with dose-limiting side-effects, particularly with prolonged usage. Thus, a better understanding and new treatment options are urgently warranted for this rare, but excruciating disease.

Temporal disconnection between pain relief and trigeminal nerve microstructural changes after Gamma Knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia

2020 ◽  
Vol 133 (3) ◽  
pp. 727-735
Author(s):  
Peter Shih-Ping Hung ◽  
Sarasa Tohyama ◽  
Jia Y. Zhang ◽  
Mojgan Hodaie
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Gamma Knife ◽  
Trigeminal Nerve ◽  
Diffusion Tensor ◽  
Gamma Knife Radiosurgery ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Microstructural Effect

OBJECTIVEGamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is a noninvasive surgical treatment option for patients with medically refractive classic trigeminal neuralgia (TN). The long-term microstructural consequences of radiosurgery and their association with pain relief remain unclear. To better understand this topic, the authors used diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to characterize the effects of GKRS on trigeminal nerve microstructure over multiple posttreatment time points.METHODSNinety-two sets of 3-T anatomical and diffusion-weighted MR images from 55 patients with TN treated by GKRS were divided within 6-, 12-, and 24-month posttreatment time points into responder and nonresponder subgroups (≥ 75% and < 75% reduction in posttreatment pain intensity, respectively). Within each subgroup, posttreatment pain intensity was then assessed against pretreatment levels and followed by DTI metric analyses, contrasting treated and contralateral control nerves to identify specific biomarkers of successful pain relief.RESULTSGKRS resulted in successful pain relief that was accompanied by asynchronous reductions in fractional anisotropy (FA), which maximized 24 months after treatment. While GKRS responders demonstrated significantly reduced FA within the radiosurgery target 12 and 24 months posttreatment (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively), nonresponders had statistically indistinguishable DTI metrics between nerve types at each time point.CONCLUSIONSUltimately, this study serves as the first step toward an improved understanding of the long-term microstructural effect of radiosurgery on TN. Given that FA reductions remained specific to responders and were absent in nonresponders up to 24 months posttreatment, FA changes have the potential of serving as temporally consistent biomarkers of optimal pain relief following radiosurgical treatment for classic TN.

Analysis of morphological measurements of the trigeminal nerve in the linac stereotactic radiosurgery simulation targeting the root entry zone in trigeminal neuralgia

Neurocirugía ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 105-114
Author(s):  
Rafael Medélez-Borbonio ◽  
Alexander Perdomo-Pantoja ◽  
Alejandro Apolinar Serrano-Rubio ◽  
Colson Tomberlin ◽  
Rogelio Revuelta-Gutiérrez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Trigeminal Nerve ◽  
Entry Zone ◽  
Root Entry Zone

scholarly journals Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Primary and Secondary Trigeminal Neuralgia

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 66 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunil K Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Microvascular Decompression ◽  
Treatment Modality ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Gamma Knife Radiosurgery ◽  
Clinical Criteria ◽  
Grade Iii

Abstract INTRODUCTION Trigeminal neuralgia has always been a disease of conflict from pathological and management perspectives. Despite advances in the radiological imaging, evidence from autopsy studies, and intraoperative findings, concrete answers are not in sight. GKRS has been a strong contender among available treatment options for the management of trigeminal neuralgia. METHODS All patients were evaluated on clinical criteria, BNI scale for intensity of pain, and facial hypoesthesia (if any) in a protocol-based manner. Only patients with BNI III to V were offered GKRS as a treatment modality. The Marseille point was targeted with a 70 to 90 Gy dose at 50% isodose. Patients were informed about all available treatment options with long-term prognosis and pain control rates. Patients in need of an immediate pain relief, in failed GKRS, and in a severe pain jeopardizing routine life and eating habits were not offered GKRS and were managed with microvascular decompression. RESULTS A total of 108 (65 males, 43 females) patients received GKRS with the Perfexion model since 2009. Eighty-two percent of the patients received GKRS for primary trigeminal neuralgia, while the rest received GKRS for secondary trigeminal neuralgia due to skull base lesions (meningioma, schwannoma, cerebellar AVM, etc). A total of 78% of the patients had preoperative BNI scale IV, while 19% and 3% of the patients had grade III and V scale pain, respectively. Ninety-four percent patients gained BNI scale III intensity pain within 3 mo of GKRS. The 3-yr pain control rate (BNI I-II) could be attained in 81% of the patients. Twelve percent of the patients remained in BNI grade III. Two patients needed redo GKRS for their pain recurrence. CONCLUSION It remains uncontested that MVD provides the best long-term pain-free control in patients of trigeminal neuralgia; however, GKRS remains a valuable feasible option for a selected group of patients. GKRS should be offered as an alternative treatment modality in patients not in urgent need of pain relief. In failed GKRS, authors did not encounter any difficulty in microvascular decompression.

Microanatomy of the Central Myelin-Peripheral Myelin Transition Zone of the Trigeminal Nerve

Neurosurgery ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 354-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Selçuk Peker ◽  
Özlem Kurtkaya ◽  
İbrahim Üzün ◽  
M Necmettin Pamir
Keyword(s):  
Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Trigeminal Nerve ◽  
Transitional Zone ◽  
Vascular Compression ◽  
Lateral Aspect ◽  
Entry Zone ◽  
Root Entry Zone ◽  
Central Myelin ◽  
Trigeminal Nerves ◽  
Vascular Decompression

Abstract OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the microanatomy of the central myelin-peripheral myelin transitional zone (TZ) in trigeminal nerves from cadavers. METHODS: One hundred trigeminal nerves from 50 cadaver heads were examined. The cisternal portion of the nerve (from the pons to Meckel's cave) was measured. Horizontal sections were stained and photographed. The photomicrographs were used to measure the extent of central myelin on the medial and lateral aspects of the nerve and to classify TZ shapes. RESULTS: The cisternal portions of the specimens ranged from 8 to 15 mm long (mean, 12.3 mm; median, 11.9 mm). The data from the photomicrographs revealed that the extent of central myelin (distance from pons to TZ) on the medial aspect of the nerve (range, 0.1–2.5 mm; mean, 1.13 mm; median, 1 mm) was shorter than that on the lateral aspect (range, 0.17–6.75 mm; mean, 2.47 mm; median, 2.12 mm). CONCLUSION: The data definitively prove that the root entry zone (REZ, nerve-pons junction) and TZ of the trigeminal nerve are distinct sites and that these terms should never be used interchangeably. The measurements showed that the central myelin occupies only the initial one-fourth of the trigeminal nerve length. If trigeminal neuralgia is caused exclusively by vascular compression of the central myelin, the problem vessel would always have to be located in this region. However, it is well known that pain from trigeminal neuralgia can resolve after vascular decompression at more distal sites. This suggests that the effects of surgical decompression are caused by another mechanism.

TRIGEMINAL NEURALGIA AND VASCULAR COMPRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH TRIGEMINAL SCHWANNOMAS

Neurosurgery ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. E974-E975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan P. Miller ◽  
Feridun Acar ◽  
Kim J. Burchiel
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Trigeminal Nerve ◽  
Gamma Knife Radiosurgery ◽  
Vascular Compression ◽  
Neurovascular Compression ◽  
Intracranial Tumors ◽  
Resonance Imaging

Abstract OBJECTIVE Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is often associated with neurovascular compression. However, intracranial tumors are occasionally observed, particularly when symptoms are atypical. We describe three patients with Type-1 TN and trigeminal schwannoma diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging, with concomitant arterial compression of the trigeminal nerve. CLINICAL PRESENTATION All three patients had Type-1 TN with spontaneous onset, paroxysm-triggered pain, and response to antiepileptic medication. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans demonstrated an ipsilateral enhancing perineural mass consistent with a schwannoma. Two of the three patients had previously undergone gamma knife radiosurgery without improvement. Subsequent high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging in all three patients revealed obvious compression of the trigeminal nerve by an arterial structure. INTERVENTION Two patients underwent retrosigmoid craniectomy followed by microvascular decompression and remain pain-free. One patient elected not to pursue surgical intervention. CONCLUSION Although intracranial tumors are occasionally observed in patients with TN, neurovascular compression must still be considered as an etiology, especially if typical TN symptoms are reported.

Long-term outcome after operation for trigeminal neuralgia in patients with posterior fossa tumors

1996 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. 818-825 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred G. Barker ◽  
Peter J. Jannetta ◽  
Ramesh P. Babu ◽  
Spiros Pomonis ◽  
David J. Bissonette ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Posterior Fossa ◽  
Trigeminal Nerve ◽  
Posterior Fossa Tumors ◽  
Duration Of Symptoms ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Entry Zone ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Root Entry Zone ◽  
Fine Print

✓ During a 20-year period, 26 patients with typical symptoms of trigeminal neuralgia were found to have posterior fossa tumors at operation. These cases included 14 meningiomas, eight acoustic neurinomas, two epidermoid tumors, one angiolipoma, and one ependymoma. The median patient age was 60 years and 69% of the patients were women. Sixty-five percent of the symptoms were left sided. The median preoperative duration of symptoms was 5 years. The distribution of pain among the three divisions of the trigeminal nerve was similar to that found in patients with trigeminal neuralgia who did not have tumors; however, more divisions tended to be involved in the tumor patients. The mean postoperative follow-up period was 9 years. At operation, the root entry zone of the trigeminal nerve was examined for vascular cross-compression in 21 patients. Vessels compressing the nerve at the root entry zone were observed in all patients examined. Postoperative pain relief was frequent and long lasting. Using Kaplan—Meier methods the authors estimated excellent relief in 81% of the patients 10 years postoperatively, with partial relief in an additional 4%.

VARIANT INTRANEURAL VEIN-TRIGEMINAL NERVE RELATIONSHIPS

Neurosurgery ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
pp. 958-961 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory M. Helbig ◽  
James D. Callahan ◽  
Aaron A. Cohen-Gadol
Keyword(s):  
Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Trigeminal Nerve ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Entry Zone ◽  
Root Entry Zone ◽  
Detailed Classification ◽  
Trigeminal Nerve Root

Abstract OBJECTIVE Trigeminal neuralgia is often caused by compression, demyelination, and injury of the trigeminal nerve root entry zone by an adjacent artery and/or vein. Previously described variations of the nerve-vessel relationship note external nerve compression. We offer a detailed classification of intraneural vessels that travel through the trigeminal nerve and safe, effective surgical management. CLINICAL PRESENTATION We report 3 microvascular decompression operations for medically refractory trigeminal neuralgia during which the surgeon encountered a vein crossing through the trigeminal nerve. Two types of intraneural veins are described: type 1, in which the vein travels between the motor and sensory branches of the trigeminal nerve (1 patient), and type 2, in which the vein bisects the sensory branch (portio major) (2 patients). INTERVENTION We recommend sacrificing the intraneural vein between the motor and sensory branches if the vein is small (most likely type 1). If the intraneural vein is large and bisects the sensory branch (most likely type 2), vein mobilization can be achieved, but often requires extensive dissection through the nerve. Because this maneuver may lead to trigeminal nerve injury and result in uncomfortable neuropathy and numbness (including corneal hypoesthesia), we recommend against mobilization of the vein through the nerve, suggesting instead, consideration of a selective trigeminal nerve rhizotomy. CONCLUSION Because aggressive dissection of intraneural vessels can lead to higher than normal complication rates, preoperative knowledge of vein-trigeminal nerve variants is crucial for intraoperative success.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document