A Dynamic Approach for Detecting the Fake News Using Random Forest Classifier and NLP

2020 ◽  
pp. 331-341
Author(s):  
J. Antony Vijay ◽  
H. Anwar Basha ◽  
J. Arun Nehru
Keyword(s):  
Random Forest ◽  
Random Forest Classifier ◽  
Fake News ◽  
Dynamic Approach

scholarly journals Detecting Fake News Tweets from Twitter

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (08) ◽  
pp. 532-537
Author(s):  
Cherlakola Abhinav Reddy ◽  
◽  
Sai Nitesh Gadiraju ◽  
Dr. Samala Nagaraj ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Support Vector Machines ◽  
Random Forest ◽  
Decision Tree ◽  
Random Forest Classifier ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Online Media ◽  
Fake News ◽  
Breaking News ◽  
Learning Techniques ◽  
Vector Machines

Online media has progressively obtained integral to the route billions of individuals experience news and occasions, frequently bypassing writers—the conventional guardians of breaking news. Occasions,in reality, make a relating spike of posts (tweets) on Twitter. This projects a great deal of significance on the validity of data found via online media stages like Twitter. We have utilized different managed learning techniques like Naïve Bayes, Decision Trees, and Support Vector Machines on the information to separate tweets among genuine and counterfeit news. For our AI models, we have utilized tweet and client highlights as our indicators. We accomplished a precision of 88% utilizing the Random Forest classifier and 88% utilizing the Decision tree. Notwithstanding, we accept that breaking down client records would build the accuracy of our models.

scholarly journals Fake News Data Exploration and Analytics

Electronics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (19) ◽  
pp. 2326
Author(s):  
Mazhar Javed Awan ◽  
Awais Yasin ◽  
Haitham Nobanee ◽  
Ahmed Abid Ali ◽  
Zain Shahzad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Random Forest ◽  
Random Forest Classifier ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Fake News ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Decision Tree Classifier ◽  
Tree Classifier ◽  
Machine Learning Models

Before the internet, people acquired their news from the radio, television, and newspapers. With the internet, the news moved online, and suddenly, anyone could post information on websites such as Facebook and Twitter. The spread of fake news has also increased with social media. It has become one of the most significant issues of this century. People use the method of fake news to pollute the reputation of a well-reputed organization for their benefit. The most important reason for such a project is to frame a device to examine the language designs that describe fake and right news through machine learning. This paper proposes models of machine learning that can successfully detect fake news. These models identify which news is real or fake and specify the accuracy of said news, even in a complex environment. After data-preprocessing and exploration, we applied three machine learning models; random forest classifier, logistic regression, and term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) vectorizer. The accuracy of the TFIDF vectorizer, logistic regression, random forest classifier, and decision tree classifier models was approximately 99.52%, 98.63%, 99.63%, and 99.68%, respectively. Machine learning models can be considered a great choice to find reality-based results and applied to other unstructured data for various sentiment analysis applications.

The Performance Improvement on 4-FB Face using Random Forest Classifier

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
B. Nassih ◽  
A. Amine ◽  
M. Ngadi ◽  
D. Naji ◽  
N. Hmina
Keyword(s):  
Random Forest ◽  
Performance Improvement ◽  
Random Forest Classifier

Methodology for Malware Classification using a Random Forest Classifier

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Domenick Morales-Molina ◽  
Diego Santamaria-Guerrero ◽  
Gabriel Sanchez-Perez ◽  
Hector Perez-Meana ◽  
Aldo Hernandez-Suarez
Keyword(s):  
Random Forest ◽  
Random Forest Classifier ◽  
Malware Classification

scholarly journals Amide proton transfer weighted (APTw) imaging based radiomics allows for the differentiation of gliomas from metastases

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Sartoretti ◽  
Thomas Sartoretti ◽  
Michael Wyss ◽  
Carolin Reischauer ◽  
Luuk van Smoorenburg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Random Forest ◽  
Brain Tumors ◽  
Proton Transfer ◽  
Multilayer Perceptron ◽  
Random Forest Classifier ◽  
Amide Proton ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Amide Proton Transfer

AbstractWe sought to evaluate the utility of radiomics for Amide Proton Transfer weighted (APTw) imaging by assessing its value in differentiating brain metastases from high- and low grade glial brain tumors. We retrospectively identified 48 treatment-naïve patients (10 WHO grade 2, 1 WHO grade 3, 10 WHO grade 4 primary glial brain tumors and 27 metastases) with either primary glial brain tumors or metastases who had undergone APTw MR imaging. After image analysis with radiomics feature extraction and post-processing, machine learning algorithms (multilayer perceptron machine learning algorithm; random forest classifier) with stratified tenfold cross validation were trained on features and were used to differentiate the brain neoplasms. The multilayer perceptron achieved an AUC of 0.836 (receiver operating characteristic curve) in differentiating primary glial brain tumors from metastases. The random forest classifier achieved an AUC of 0.868 in differentiating WHO grade 4 from WHO grade 2/3 primary glial brain tumors. For the differentiation of WHO grade 4 tumors from grade 2/3 tumors and metastases an average AUC of 0.797 was achieved. Our results indicate that the use of radiomics for APTw imaging is feasible and the differentiation of primary glial brain tumors from metastases is achievable with a high degree of accuracy.

scholarly journals Fully automated analysis combining [18F]-FET-PET and multiparametric MRI including DSC perfusion and APTw imaging: a promising tool for objective evaluation of glioma progression

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. J. Paprottka ◽  
S. Kleiner ◽  
C. Preibisch ◽  
F. Kofler ◽  
F. Schmidt-Graf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Random Forest ◽  
Tumor Progression ◽  
Automated Analysis ◽  
Random Forest Classifier ◽  
Imaging Modalities ◽  
Amide Proton ◽  
Tumor Board ◽  
Dynamic Susceptibility ◽  
Fet Pet ◽  
Promising Tool

Abstract Purpose To evaluate diagnostic accuracy of fully automated analysis of multimodal imaging data using [18F]-FET-PET and MRI (including amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) imaging and dynamic-susceptibility-contrast (DSC) perfusion) in differentiation of tumor progression from treatment-related changes in patients with glioma. Material and methods At suspected tumor progression, MRI and [18F]-FET-PET data as part of a retrospective analysis of an observational cohort of 66 patients/74 scans (51 glioblastoma and 23 lower-grade-glioma, 8 patients included at two different time points) were automatically segmented into necrosis, FLAIR-hyperintense, and contrast-enhancing areas using an ensemble of deep learning algorithms. In parallel, previous MR exam was processed in a similar way to subtract preexisting tumor areas and focus on progressive tumor only. Within these progressive areas, intensity statistics were automatically extracted from [18F]-FET-PET, APTw, and DSC-derived cerebral-blood-volume (CBV) maps and used to train a Random Forest classifier with threefold cross-validation. To evaluate contribution of the imaging modalities to the classifier’s performance, impurity-based importance measures were collected. Classifier performance was compared with radiology reports and interdisciplinary tumor board assessments. Results In 57/74 cases (77%), tumor progression was confirmed histopathologically (39 cases) or via follow-up imaging (18 cases), while remaining 17 cases were diagnosed as treatment-related changes. The classification accuracy of the Random Forest classifier was 0.86, 95% CI 0.77–0.93 (sensitivity 0.91, 95% CI 0.81–0.97; specificity 0.71, 95% CI 0.44–0.9), significantly above the no-information rate of 0.77 (p = 0.03), and higher compared to an accuracy of 0.82 for MRI (95% CI 0.72–0.9), 0.81 for [18F]-FET-PET (95% CI 0.7–0.89), and 0.81 for expert consensus (95% CI 0.7–0.89), although these differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.1 for all comparisons, McNemar test). [18F]-FET-PET hot-spot volume was single-most important variable, with relevant contribution from all imaging modalities. Conclusion Automated, joint image analysis of [18F]-FET-PET and advanced MR imaging techniques APTw and DSC perfusion is a promising tool for objective response assessment in gliomas.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document