Soot Formation Characteristics of Homogeneous Supercritical Fuel Spray of Dieseline Blend

Author(s):  
Sanaur Rehman ◽  
Shah Shahood Alam
Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reo Kai ◽  
Akihiro Kishimoto ◽  
Kenichiro Takenaka ◽  
Masaya Muto ◽  
Ryoichi Kurose

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. E. Morgan ◽  
M. R. Gold ◽  
O. Laguitton ◽  
C. Crua ◽  
M. R. Heikal

Author(s):  
Ming Zhang ◽  
Michael C. Drake ◽  
Kevin Peterson

Eight different multi-hole fuel injectors with nominally the same exterior geometry (8-hole, 60 degree circular symmetric spray pattern) but different levels of development (Generation I and Generation II), length-to-diameter (L/D) ratios (1.4 to 2.4), and manufacturing processes (EDM vs. laser drilled) are compared in a spray-guided, spark-ignition direct injection (SG-SIDI) single-cylinder optical engine. In-cylinder pressure measurements and exhaust emission measurements quantified effects of different injectors on combustion and emissions. Crank-angle-resolved white-light spray imaging and simultaneous flame and soot visualization quantified variations in spray structure, combustion propagation, and soot formation and oxidation. At a single operating condition (2000rpm, 95kPa inlet pressure, 90°C engine temperature, end of injection timing (EOI) @ 36 BTDC, spark advance (SA) @ 36 BTDC, 8.1mg/injection), all eight injectors have nearly the same IMEP (about 270kPa) and engine-out gaseous emissions. Experiments show that laser drilled injectors with lower L/D ratios (L/D = 1.4–2.0) have a totally collapsed fuel spray structure, a more penetrating liquid spray with severe fuel impingement on the piston, and rapidly-forming soot deposits on the piston. The collapsed, more compact fuel spray vaporized more slowly and the resulting rich zones led to strong soot luminosity. In contrast, the laser drilled injector with the highest L/D ratio (2.4) and the two EDM injectors (Generation I and Generation II with L/D = 2.0) show 8 distinct spray plumes, less fuel impingement, and much less soot emission intensity. Image analysis tools developed in Matlab were used to characterize the flame propagation and soot formation processes.


2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 1057-1070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olawole Abiola Kuti ◽  
Wu Zhang ◽  
Keiya Nishida ◽  
Xiangang Wang ◽  
Zuohua Huang

2007 ◽  
Vol 2007.7 (0) ◽  
pp. 183-184
Author(s):  
Jun HAYASHI ◽  
Takehiko SEO ◽  
Chulju AHN ◽  
Fumiteru AKAMATSU

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 447-465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingyu Zhu ◽  
Keiya Nishida ◽  
Olawole Abiola Kuti ◽  
Seoksu Moon

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document