Sex differences in self-confidence: The influence of comparison to others' ability level

Sex Roles ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 925-942 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen Lenney ◽  
Joel Gold ◽  
Chris Browning
1982 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen Lenney ◽  
Joel Gold

1978 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 931-936 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheryl Potts ◽  
Walter T. Plant ◽  
Mara L. Southern

Subjects were 106 students categorized into four groups on the basis of their sex and verbal ability: very bright men ( n = 23), very bright women ( n = 30), below average men ( n = 23) and below average women ( n = 30). Scores were also obtained from five scales of the California Psychological Inventory and the Attitudes Toward Women Scale. Six, 2(sex) × 2(ability levels) fixed effects factorial analyses of variance were computed yielding 12 F ratios. Estimates of ω2 were also computed for each significant F ratio. Four ω2 estimates of .02 to .11 were obtained for the independent variable of sex whereas five ω2 of .03 to .26 were obtained for the independent variable of ability level. In that four of the values of ω2 for ability were greater than any for the variable of sex, it was concluded that verbal ability better accounts for more variance in the personality-attitude measures used than does sex of subjects.


1981 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 547-569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael C. White ◽  
Gerardine De Sanctis ◽  
Michael D. Crino

This manuscript reviews the adjustment of women managers to the managerial role. The primary focus of the paper is on sex differences in relation to self-confidence, achievement and fear of success, leadership ability, and personality characteristics. In addition, career tactics and career strategies managers utilize to achieve success are discussed. Deficiencies in research, the need for a systematic theoretical framework, and possible future trends are also presented.


1983 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jayne E. Stake

This study represents an effort to clarify the effects of negative and positive information on performance expectancies of males and females. In testing the effects of feedback on 93 women and 97 men undergraduates, ability level, information condition, self-esteem level, and sex of subject were included in a 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design. Before feedback, males stated higher expectancies ( p < .05) and overestimated their performance more ( p < .05) than did females. Sex by feedback interactions ( p < .02) revealed that after feedback consistent with subjects' ability, males continued to set higher goals and to overestimate their performance more, but that after inconsistent feedback this sex difference did not occur.


1980 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice Ross Gold ◽  
Lorelei R. Brush ◽  
Eve R. Sprotzer

Sex differences in self-perceptions of intelligence and self-confidence were examined among third through eighth graders. In third grade, differences between the sexes were small and, in the case of perceptions of intelligence, favored the females. By fifth grade, males were more likely to describe themselves as smart and self-confident than were females. These differences persisted into the eighth grade. Further analyses indicated that the sex differences could not be adequately explained by the process of internalizing sex-stereotypes.


1977 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 1007-1010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Virginia Brabender ◽  
Susan K. Boardman

Sex differences in self-confidence were assessed by measuring the discrepancy between 20 male and 20 female subjects' perceived and actual reaction times (RTs) in a matching task. Subjects judged whether or not two letters were the same. After each trial, perceived and actual RTs were recorded. Whereas half of the subjects received RT feedback from the experimenter after the experimental trials, the other half did not. Half of the subjects were given a standard by which to evaluate their own performance and the other half were not. The absence of a significant difference between the actual RTs of 20 male and 20 female subjects indicates that they were equally efficient in matching letters. However, the extent to which subjects would underestimate their RTs was sex-dependent: without RT feedback, women underestimated their actual RTs more than men. In contrast to previous findings, relative to men, women exhibited no tendency to devaluate their performance.


1969 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-122
Author(s):  
Donald L. Mac Millan

Normal and educable mentally retarded Ss of several ages were tested for repetition choice preference to determine whether ability level or sex were determinants of repetition of previously completed or interrupted tasks. For normal and EMR boys, as CA and MA increased so did the tendency to repeat interrupted tasks. A curvilinear relationship between repetition choice and CA was found for normal and EMR girls. A sex difference became apparent between ages 11 and 17, with males choosing to repeat interrupted tasks in increasing proportions and females reverting to an increased preference for previously completed tasks. For the total sample, males repeated significantly more interrupted tasks than did females.


2017 ◽  
Vol 225 (4) ◽  
pp. S172-S173
Author(s):  
Audrey C. Pendleton ◽  
Afshin Parsikia ◽  
Sheldon H. Teperman ◽  
Melvin E. Stone ◽  
Srinivas H. Reddy ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 307
Author(s):  
Ade Nur ◽  
Euis Eti Rohaeti ◽  
Rippi Maya

This study aims to examine the achievement and improvement of the ability of mathematical connections and confidence of students through problem-based learning model. The population in this study is all students of 7th grade from one of SMP Negeri in Bandung. Samples were taken at random class. Among the eleven classes, two classes were selected as an experimental class (VII-K) and a control class (VII-B). The research instruments consist of a test instruments (math connection ability) and a non-test instruments. The instrument in the form of test is a set of test questions to measure students' mathematical connection ability. While non-test instruments in the form of a scale of students' self-confidence, and the scale of student opinions on problem-based learning. Research shows that the achievement and improvement of the ability of mathematical connections and confidence of students whose learning using problem-based learning model there is a difference with the learning using ordinary learning in terms of the initial ability level of students. There is no interaction between the problem-based learning model and the student's initial ability level to generate mathematical connections and students' self-confidence. In addition there is a correlation between the ability of mathematical connections and students' self confidence in the classroom that uses the problem-based learning model as well as in the classroom using ordinary learning.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document