E. coli ribosomal proteins are cross reactive with antibody prepared against Chlamydomonas reinhardi chloroplast ribosomal subunit

The aim of this study is to understand the mechanism of 16S rRNA folding into the compact structure of the small 30S subunit of E. coli ribosome. The assembly of the 30S E. coli ribosomal subunit is a sequence of specific interactions of 16S rRNA with 21 ribosomal proteins (S1-S21). Using dedicated high resolution STEM we have monitored structural changes induced in 16S rRNA by the proteins S4, S8, S15 and S20 which are involved in the initial steps of 30S subunit assembly. S4 is the first protein to bind directly and stoichiometrically to 16S rRNA. Direct binding also occurs individually between 16S RNA and S8 and S15. However, binding of S20 requires the presence of S4 and S8. The RNA-protein complexes are prepared by the standard reconstitution procedure, dialyzed against 60 mM KCl, 2 mM Mg(OAc)2, 10 mM-Hepes-KOH pH 7.5 (Buffer A), freeze-dried and observed unstained in dark field at -160°.

Download Full-text

A comparison of the unfolding and dissociation of the large ribosome subunits from Rhodopseudomonas·spheroides N.C.I.B. 8253 and Escherichia coli M.R.E. 600

Biochemical Journal ◽

10.1042/bj1330739 ◽

1973 ◽

Vol 133 (4) ◽

pp. 739-747 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

A. Robinson ◽

J. Sykes

Keyword(s):

Escherichia Coli ◽

Protein Interactions ◽

Ribosomal Proteins ◽

Ribosomal Subunit ◽

23S Rrna ◽

Core Particle ◽

Protein Loss ◽

E Coli ◽

Rrna Species ◽

Rhodopseudomonas Spheroides

1. The behaviour of the large ribosomal subunit from Rhodopseudomonas spheroides (45S) has been compared with the 50S ribosome from Escherichia coli M.R.E. 600 (and E. coli M.R.E. 162) during unfolding by removal of Mg2+ and detachment of ribosomal proteins by high univalent cation concentrations. The extent to which these processes are reversible with these ribosomes has also been examined. 2. The R. spheroides 45S ribosome unfolds relatively slowly but then gives rise directly to two ribonucleoprotein particles (16.6S and 13.7S); the former contains the intact primary structure of the 16.25S rRNA species and the latter the 15.00S rRNA species of the original ribosome. No detectable protein loss occurs during unfolding. The E. coli ribosome unfolds via a series of discrete intermediates to a single, unfolded ribonucleoprotein unit (19.1S) containing the 23S rRNA and all the protein of the original ribosome. 3. The two unfolded R. spheroides ribonucleoproteins did not recombine when the original conditions were restored but each simply assumed a more compact configuration. Similar treatments reversed the unfolding of the E. coli 50S ribosomes; replacement of Mg2+ caused the refolding of the initial products of unfolding and in the presence of Ni2+ the completely unfolded species (19.1S) again sedimented at the same rate as the original ribosomes (44S). 4. Ribosomal proteins (25%) were dissociated from R. spheroides 45S ribosomes by dialysis against a solution with a Na+/Mg2+ ratio of 250:1. During this process two core particles were formed (21.2S and 14.2S) and the primary structures of the two original rRNA species were conserved. This dissociation was not reversed. With E. coli 50S approximately 15% of the original ribosomal protein was dissociated, a single 37.6S core particle was formed, the 23S rRNA remained intact and the ribosomal proteins would reassociate with the core particle to give a 50S ribosome. 5. The ribonuclease activities in R. spheroides 45S and E. coli M.R.E. 600 and E. coli M.R.E. 162 50S ribosomes are compared. 6. The observations concerning unfolding and dissociation are consistent with previous reports showing the unusual rRNA complement of the mature R. spheroides 45S ribosome and show the dependence of these events upon the rRNA and the importance of protein–protein interactions in the structure of the R. spheroides ribosome.

Download Full-text

Regulation of Ribosomal Protein OperonsrplM-rpsI,rpmB-rpmG, andrplU-rpmAat the Transcriptional and Translational Levels

Journal of Bacteriology ◽

10.1128/jb.00187-16 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 198 (18) ◽

pp. 2494-2502 ◽

Cited By ~ 14

Author(s):

Leonid V. Aseev ◽

Ludmila S. Koledinskaya ◽

Irina V. Boni

Keyword(s):

Ribosomal Proteins ◽

Ribosome Biogenesis ◽

Ribosomal Subunit ◽

General Rule ◽

Single Copy ◽

Translation Initiation Region ◽

Content Type ◽

Regulatory Pathways ◽

E Coli

ABSTRACTIt is widely assumed that in the best-characterized model bacteriumEscherichia coli, transcription units encoding ribosomal proteins (r-proteins) and regulation of their expression have been already well defined. However, transcription start sites for severalE. colir-protein operons have been established only very recently, so that information concerning the regulation of these operons at the transcriptional or posttranscriptional level is still missing. This paper describes for the first time thein vivoregulation of three r-protein operons,rplM-rpsI,rpmB-rpmG, andrplU-rpmA. The results demonstrate that transcription of all three operons is subject to ppGpp/DksA-dependent negative stringent control under amino acid starvation, in parallel with the rRNA operons. By using single-copy translational fusions with the chromosomallacZgene, we show here that at the translation level only one of these operons,rplM-rpsI, is regulated by the mechanism of autogenous repression involving the 5′ untranslated region (UTR) of the operon mRNA, whilerpmB-rpmGandrplU-rpmAare not subject to this type of regulation. This may imply that translational feedback control is not a general rule for modulating the expression ofE. colir-protein operons. Finally, we report that L13, a primary protein in 50S ribosomal subunit assembly, serves as a repressor ofrplM-rpsIexpressionin vivo, acting at a target within therplMtranslation initiation region. Thus, L13 represents a novel example of regulatory r-proteins in bacteria.IMPORTANCEIt is important to obtain a deeper understanding of the regulatory mechanisms responsible for coordinated and balanced synthesis of ribosomal components. In this paper, we highlight the major role of a stringent response in regulating transcription of three previously unexplored r-protein operons, and we show that only one of them is subject to feedback regulation at the translational level. Improved knowledge of the regulatory pathways controlling ribosome biogenesis may promote the development of novel antibacterial agents.

Download Full-text

Structure of the Bacterial Ribosome at 2 Å Resolution

10.1101/2020.06.26.174334 ◽

2020 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Zoe L. Watson ◽

Fred R. Ward ◽

Raphaël Méheust ◽

Omer Ad ◽

Alanna Schepartz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ribosomal Proteins ◽

Noncovalent Interactions ◽

Ribosomal Subunit ◽

E Coli ◽

Bacterial Ribosome ◽

Domains Of Life ◽

Chemical Resolution ◽

70S Ribosome ◽

A Site ◽

First Time

AbstractContinuing advances in cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) demonstrate the promise it holds for revealing biological structures at chemical resolution, in which noncovalent interactions, RNA and protein modifications, and solvation can be modeled accurately. At present, the best cryo-EM-derived models of the bacterial ribosome are of the large (50S) ribosomal subunit with effective global resolutions of 2.4-2.5 Å, based on map-to-model Fourier shell correlation (FSC). Here we present a model of the E. coli 70S ribosome with an effective global resolution of 2.0 Å, based on maps showcasing unambiguous positioning of residues, their detailed chemical interactions, and chemical modifications. These modifications include the first examples of isopeptide and thioamide backbone substitutions in ribosomal proteins, the former of which is likely conserved in all domains of life. The model also defines extensive solvation of the small (30S) ribosomal subunit for the first time, as well as interactions with A-site and P-site tRNAs, mRNA, and the antibiotic paromomycin. The high quality of the maps now allows a deeper phylogenetic analysis of ribosomal components, and identification of structural conservation to the level of solvation. The maps and models of the bacterial ribosome presented here should enable future structural analysis of the chemical basis for translation, and the development of robust tools for cryo-EM structure modeling and refinement.

Download Full-text

Effects of Ribosomal Protein S10 Flexible Loop Mutations on Tetracycline and Tigecycline Susceptibility of Escherichia coli

Frontiers in Microbiology ◽

10.3389/fmicb.2021.663835 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 12 ◽

Author(s):

Norbert Izghirean ◽

Claudia Waidacher ◽

Clemens Kittinger ◽

Miriam Chyba ◽

Günther Koraimann ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Escherichia Coli ◽

Ribosomal Proteins ◽

Parent Strain ◽

Ribosomal Subunit ◽

Tetracycline Resistance ◽

E Coli ◽

Growth Defects ◽

Flexible Loop ◽

Cold Sensitive ◽

High Level

Tigecycline is a tetracycline derivative that is being used as an antibiotic of last resort. Both tigecycline and tetracycline bind to the small (30S) ribosomal subunit and inhibit translation. Target mutations leading to resistance to these antibiotics have been identified both in the 16S ribosomal RNA and in ribosomal proteins S3 and S10 (encoded by the rpsJ gene). Several different mutations in the S10 flexible loop tip residue valine 57 (V57) have been observed in tigecycline-resistant Escherichia coli isolates. However, the role of these mutations in E. coli has not yet been characterized in a defined genetic background. In this study, we chromosomally integrated 10 different rpsJ mutations into E. coli, resulting in different exchanges or a deletion of S10 V57, and investigated the effects of the mutations on growth and tigecycline/tetracycline resistance. While one exchange, V57K, decreased the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) (Etest) to tetracycline to 0.75 μg/ml (compared to 2 μg/ml in the parent strain) and hence resulted in hypersensitivity to tetracycline, most exchanges, including the ones reported previously in resistant isolates (V57L, V57D, and V57I) resulted in slightly increased MICs to tigecycline and tetracycline. The strongest increase was observed for the V57L mutant, with a MIC (Etest) to tigecycline of 0.5 μg/ml (compared to 0.125 μg/ml in the parent strain) and a MIC to tetracycline of 4.0 μg/ml. Nevertheless, none of these exchanges increased the MIC to the extent observed in previously described clinical tigecycline-resistant isolates. We conclude that, next to S10 mutations, additional mutations are necessary in order to reach high-level tigecycline resistance in E. coli. In addition, our data reveal that mutants carrying S10 V57 exchanges or deletion display growth defects and, in most cases, also thermosensitivity. The defects are particularly strong in the V57 deletion mutant, which is additionally cold-sensitive. We hypothesize that the S10 loop tip residue is critical for the correct functioning of S10. Both the S10 flexible loop and tigecycline are in contact with helix h31 of the 16S rRNA. We speculate that exchanges or deletion of V57 alter the positioning of h31, thereby influencing both tigecycline binding and S10 function.

Download Full-text

cfrB, cfrC, and a potential new cfr-like gene in Clostridium difficile strains recovered across Latin America

10.1101/649020 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Vanja Stojković ◽

María Fernanda Ulate ◽

Fanny Hidalgo-Villeda ◽

Emmanuel Aguilar ◽

Camilo Monge-Cascante ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Latin America ◽

Ribosomal Proteins ◽

Functional Characterization ◽

Ribosomal Subunit ◽

23S Rrna ◽

Cross Resistance ◽

Protection Factor ◽

E Coli

ABSTRACTCfr is a radical S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM) enzyme that confers cross-resistance to all antibiotics targeting the large ribosomal subunit through hypermethylation of nucleotide A2503 of 23S rRNA. Of the four known cfr genes known to date, cfr(B) and cfr(C) have been sporadically found in C. difficile, yet functional characterization of cfr(C) is still lacking. We identified genes for putative Cfr-like enzymes among clinical C. difficile strains from Mexico, Honduras, Costa Rica, and Chile. To confirm their identity and activity, we obtained minimum inhibitory concentrations for ribosome-targeting antibiotics, annotated whole genome sequences, and performed a functional characterization of Cfr(C). The seven representative isolates analyzed displayed different levels of resistance to PhLOPSA antibiotics in the absence of the ribosome protection factor OptrA, and mutations in genes for 23S rRNAs or the ribosomal proteins L3 and L4. cfr(B) was detected in four isolates as part of a Tn6218-like transposon or an un-described mobile genetic element. In turn, cfr(C) was found integrated into an ICE-element. One isolate harbored a putative cfr-like gene that shows only 51-58% of sequence identity to Cfr and known Cfr-like enzymes. Moreover, our in vitro assays confirmed that Cfr(C) methylates E. coli and C. difficile 23S rRNA fragments. These results indicate selection of cfr-like genes in C. difficile from Latin America, suggest that the diversity of cfr-like resistance genes is larger than anticipated, and provide the first assessment of the methylation activity of Cfr(C).

Download Full-text

Structure of ribosomes

Canadian Journal of Biochemistry ◽

10.1139/o79-166 ◽

1979 ◽

Vol 57 (11) ◽

pp. 1251-1261 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

H. G. Wittmann

Keyword(s):

Escherichia Coli ◽

Ribosomal Proteins ◽

Tertiary Structure ◽

Protein Biosynthesis ◽

Ribosomal Subunit ◽

Immunological Methods ◽

Detailed Knowledge ◽

Essential Difference ◽

E Coli

Ribosomes are multicomponent particles on which biosynthesis of proteins occurs in all organisms. The best known ribosome, namely that of Escherichia coli, consists of three RNAs and 53 different proteins. All proteins have been isolated and characterized by chemical, physical, and immunological methods. The primary sequences of 47 E. coli ribosomal proteins have so far been determined. Studies of the shape, as well as the secondary and tertiary structure, of the proteins are in progress.Various techniques (e.g. immune electron microscopy and cross-linking of neighbouring components in situ) give information about the architecture of the ribosomal particle. The first technique resulted in illustrative and detailed knowledge not only on the shape of the ribosomal subunits but also about the location of many proteins on the surface of the particles. The analysis of cross-links between ribosomal proteins and (or) RNAs has in several cases been pursued to the level of elucidating which amino acids and (or) nucleotides are cross-linked together in situ. Reconstitution of a fully active E. coli 50S ribosomal subunit from its isolated RNA and protein components can be accomplished by means of a two-step incubation procedure. From the analysis of the intermediates occurring during the reconstitution process it has been concluded that the in vitro reconstitution process resembles the in vivo assembly of 50S subunits in many respects. Escherichia coli mutants with alterations in almost all ribosomal proteins have been isolated. Their biochemical and genetic analyses are very useful tools for obtaining information about the structure, function, and biosynthesis of ribosomes as well as about the location of the genes for these proteins on the chromosome. From comparative electrophoretic, immunological, protein–chemical, and reconstitution studies on ribosomes from various species it has become clear that there is little homology between ribosomes from prokaryotes and those from eukaryotes. This finding is surprising since there is no essential difference in the way in which pro- and eu-karyotic ribosomes function in protein biosynthesis.

Download Full-text

Structural organization of escherichia coli ribosomes as determined by immuno electron microscopy

Proceedings, annual meeting, Electron Microscopy Society of America ◽

10.1017/s0424820100081693 ◽

1978 ◽

Vol 36 (2) ◽

pp. 166-167 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

G. Stöffler ◽

R.W. Bald ◽

J. Dieckhoff ◽

H. Eckhard ◽

R. Lührmann ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Electron Microscopy ◽

Escherichia Coli ◽

Ribosomal Proteins ◽

Structural Organization ◽

Three Dimensional ◽

Ribosomal Subunit ◽

Spatial Arrangement ◽

Small Subunit ◽

Antibody Binding ◽

Immuno Electron Microscopy

A central step towards an understanding of the structure and function of the Escherichia coli ribosome, a large multicomponent assembly, is the elucidation of the spatial arrangement of its 54 proteins and its three rRNA molecules. The structural organization of ribosomal components has been investigated by a number of experimental approaches. Specific antibodies directed against each of the 54 ribosomal proteins of Escherichia coli have been performed to examine antibody-subunit complexes by electron microscopy. The position of the bound antibody, specific for a particular protein, can be determined; it indicates the location of the corresponding protein on the ribosomal surface.The three-dimensional distribution of each of the 21 small subunit proteins on the ribosomal surface has been determined by immuno electron microscopy: the 21 proteins have been found exposed with altogether 43 antibody binding sites. Each one of 12 proteins showed antibody binding at remote positions on the subunit surface, indicating highly extended conformations of the proteins concerned within the 30S ribosomal subunit; the remaining proteins are, however, not necessarily globular in shape (Fig. 1).

Download Full-text

Ribosome Structural Organization

Proceedings, annual meeting, Electron Microscopy Society of America ◽

10.1017/s0424820100051670 ◽

1974 ◽

Vol 32 ◽

pp. 332-333

Author(s):

James A. Lake

Keyword(s):

Ribosomal Proteins ◽

Structural Organization ◽

Three Dimensional ◽

Small Subunit ◽

Structural Studies ◽

X Ray Diffraction ◽

Specific Antibodies ◽

X Ray ◽

E Coli ◽

Complete Sequences

The understanding of ribosome structure has advanced considerably in the last several years. Biochemists have characterized the constituent proteins and rRNA's of ribosomes. Complete sequences have been determined for some ribosomal proteins and specific antibodies have been prepared against all E. coli small subunit proteins. In addition, a number of naturally occuring systems of three dimensional ribosome crystals which are suitable for structural studies have been observed in eukaryotes. Although the crystals are, in general, too small for X-ray diffraction, their size is ideal for electron microscopy.

Download Full-text

Structural similarity of ribosomes from E. coli and A. salina

Proceedings, annual meeting, Electron Microscopy Society of America ◽

10.1017/s0424820100082078 ◽

1978 ◽

Vol 36 (2) ◽

pp. 242-243

Author(s):

M. Boublik ◽

R.M. Wydro ◽

W. Hellmann ◽

F. Jenkins

Keyword(s):

Ribosomal Proteins ◽

Direct Evidence ◽

Structural Similarity ◽

Carbon Support ◽

Artemia Salina ◽

Uranyl Acetate ◽

Biological Assays ◽

E Coli ◽

And Function ◽

Fine Carbon

Ribosomes are ribonucleoprotein particles necessary for processing the genetic information of mRNA into proteins. Analogy in composition and function of ribosomes from diverse species, established by biochemical and biological assays, implies their structural similarity. Direct evidence obtained by electron microscopy seems to be of increasing relevance in understanding the structure of ribosomes and the mechanism of their role in protein synthesis.The extent of the structural homology between prokaryotic and eukaryotic ribosomes has been studied on ribosomes of Escherichia coli (E.c.) and Artemia salina (A.s.). Despite the established differences in size and in the amount and proportion of ribosomal proteins and RNAs both types of ribosomes show an overall similarity. The monosomes (stained with 0.5% aqueous uranyl acetate and deposited on a fine carbon support) appear in the electron micrographs as round particles with a diameter of approximately 225Å for the 70S E.c. (Fig. 1) and 260Å for the 80S A.s. monosome (Fig. 2).

Download Full-text