Analyzing organizational ideology: A workplace assessment exercise

1996 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 237-257
Author(s):  
Albert S. King ◽  
Barbara Ehrhard
Keyword(s):  
2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 621-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic ◽  
Dave Winsborough ◽  
Ryne A. Sherman ◽  
Robert Hogan

Almost 20 years after McKinsey introduced the idea of a war for talent, technology is disrupting the talent identification industry. From smartphone profiling apps to workplace big data, the digital revolution has produced a wide range of new tools for making quick and cheap inferences about human potential and predicting future work performance. However, academic industrial–organizational (I-O) psychologists appear to be mostly spectators. Indeed, there is little scientific research on innovative assessment methods, leaving human resources (HR) practitioners with no credible evidence to evaluate the utility of such tools. To this end, this article provides an overview of new talent identification tools, using traditional workplace assessment methods as the organizing framework for classifying and evaluating new tools, which are largely technologically enhanced versions of traditional methods. We highlight some opportunities and challenges for I-O psychology practitioners interested in exploring and improving these innovations.


2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. S297-S298
Author(s):  
H. Al-Taiar

IntroductionA recent Royal College of Physicians’ (RCP) study on assessment raises serious questions for workplace assessment. To address these, a system that bridges the gap from competence to performance and integrates supervised learning events (SLEs) that are formative in purpose with summative assessment of performance by entrustable professional activities (EPAs) is recommended.Aims and objectivesAs a working group on assessment in psychiatry, we were interested in the RCP findings which represent a significant milestone in studies of workplace assessment. The RCP aims were to evaluate the feasibility, validity and educational value of using existing WPBA tools but for different assessment purposes and processes.ResultsThese were based on the General Medical Council (GMC) working party on assessment. The RCP revised its assessment processes to differentiate between assessments of development and performance. The former are formative and aim to identify a trainee's areas of strength and development; the latter are summative and aim to determine fitness to progress. Of note is that the same workplace based assessment (WPBA) tool can be used for each type of assessment; the assessment's purpose is the discriminating factor.ConclusionsInitial design of the requisite EPAs requires value judgments by trainers and trainees alike on what represent core units of work. EPAs can contribute directly and more meaningfully to ARCP progression decisions.RecommendationsInclusion of the required level of supervision as part of SLE feedback enables future decisions on meeting performance standards.Trainee/trainerInteraction in this educational process.Disclosure of interestThe author has not supplied his/her declaration of competing interest.


10.12737/110 ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. 46-54
Author(s):  
Федорец ◽  
Aleksandr Fedorets ◽  
Мишутинская ◽  
E. Mishutinskaya

The most significant innovations of workplace assessment procedure according to working conditions, characteristic mistakes and contradictions as well as some positive moments are noted in this article. It is the authors’ opinion that a new Order has provisions which practically exclude possibilities for legitimate carrying out of workplace assessment procedure by any certifying organizations and don’t allow the organizations to prove undoubtedly the need of compensations connected with working conditions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (Special1) ◽  
pp. 251-254
Author(s):  
Shaik Farid AW ◽  
Ahmad Rasdan lsmail ◽  
Rohayu O

Complaint of pain due to work related musculoskeletal disorder at workplace is nothing new.  Nevertheless, in Malaysia, the data leading to this is near to none, when healthcare industry is concerned.  The purpose of this article is to evaluate the current physical condition at red zone of accident and emergency department at selected hospitals and has the current condition contribute to the work-related musculoskeletal disorder among healthcare personnel. The study is conducted at five red zones of accident and emergency department of Malaysia tertiary hospitals. Before conducting the study, ethical approval has been obtained from ethical committee of Kementerian Kesihatan Malaysia.  Method used in this study is workplace assessment, which allows first-hand experienced to determine and evaluate the real condition of red zone at selected hospitals. Duration of twelve months is required to complete the assessment.  During the workplace assessment, the lighting at red zone (focusing on bed area), the bed space, arrangement of equipment and height of monitors are observed, measured and recorded.  Result show, every red zone is unique with its own layout and design.  There is no standardization among all the red zones involved. Existing guideline for physical condition of red zone of accident and emergency does not exist. Thus, relationship between physical condition of existing red zone and whether it causes work related musculoskeletal disorder must be discussed in length.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document