Dose-response relationship of the ?-adrenoceptor antagonist bisoprolol in patients with coronary heart disease and chronic obstructive bronchitis

1984 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Dorow ◽  
U. T�nnesmann
2022 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaoxiu Li ◽  
Wenying Wu ◽  
Yumeng Song ◽  
Shuang Xu ◽  
Xiaomei Wu

Background: Evidence suggests that the total bilirubin has a protective effect on coronary heart disease (CHD), but the dose-response relationship remains controversial, and there is no meta-analysis to assess the relationship.Methods: As of October 1, 2021, relevant literature was selected from four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase) by using a retrieval strategy. The dose-response curve between the total bilirubin and CHD was fitted by a restricted cubic spline. Stata 12.0 was used for statistical analysis.Results: A total of 170,209 (6,342 cases) participants from 7 prospective studies were analyzed in our meta-analysis. We calculated the pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs for the association between serum bilirubin level and risk of CHD using random-effects models. Compared with the first quantile, the bilirubin level in the third quantile had a protective effect on the risk of CHD (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82–0.99). The restricted cubic spline functions depicted a U-type curve relationship between bilirubin (3.42–49 μmol/L) and CHD (Plinear < 0.001). When the bilirubin level was in the range of 3.42–13μmol/L, the protective effect of bilirubin on CHD was enhanced with increasing bilirubin levels. When the bilirubin level exceeded 13μmol/L, the protective effect of bilirubin weakened, and a dangerous effect gradually appeared with further increases in bilirubin levels.Conclusions: Compared with a low bilirubin level, a high bilirubin level has a protective effect on the risk of CHD, and there was a U-shaped dose-response relationship between them.


1988 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.C. Sherlock ◽  
M.J. Quinn

Wide discrepancies have been observed between controlled and uncontrolled intake studies of the relationship of blood mercury concentration to intake of mercury. The probable reason for the apparent discrepancies is that the within-subject variation of mercury intake in the uncontrolled studies was almost certainly considerably larger than the within-subject variation in blood mercury concentration; in these circumstances, the apparent slope obtained from a linear regression of blood mercury on intake will invariably be much smaller than the true slope. Studies of the exposure or intake of any substance should therefore include a consideration of the likely within-subject variation in the exposure or intake relative to that in the effect.


2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 234-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saki Nakamura ◽  
Nao Watanabe ◽  
Naoki Yoshimura ◽  
Sayaka Ozawa ◽  
Keiichi Hirono ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 81 (SUPPLEMENT) ◽  
pp. A1351
Author(s):  
M. F. Watcha ◽  
P. J. Bras ◽  
J. Pennant ◽  
G. Cieslak ◽  
D. Burnette

2017 ◽  
Vol 91 (12) ◽  
pp. 3961-3989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steffen Schneider ◽  
Karma C. Fussell ◽  
Stephanie Melching-Kollmuss ◽  
Roland Buesen ◽  
Sibylle Gröters ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document