Performance of coated carbide tools when grooving wood-based materials: effect of work materials and coating materials on the wear resistance of coated carbide tools

2001 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wayan Darmawan ◽  
Chiaki Tanaka ◽  
Hiroshi Usuki ◽  
Tadashi Ohtani
Keyword(s):  
Wear Resistance ◽  
Coating Materials ◽  
Coated Carbide ◽  
Coated Carbide Tools

scholarly journals Efficiency of Application of (Mo, Al)N-Based Coatings with Inclusion of Ti, Zr or Cr during the Turning of Steel of Nickel-Based Alloy

Coatings ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1271
Author(s):  
Alexey Vereschaka ◽  
Filipp Milovich ◽  
Nikolay Andreev ◽  
Nikolay Sitnikov ◽  
Islam Alexandrov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Wear Resistance ◽  
Protective Properties ◽  
Wear Resistant Coatings ◽  
Composition And Structure ◽  
Nickel Based Alloy ◽  
Scratch Tests ◽  
1045 Steel ◽  
Coated Carbide ◽  
Coated Carbide Tools ◽  
Active Formation

The article compares the properties of multilayer composite wear-resistant coatings of Zr–ZrN–(Zr, Mo, Al)N, Ti–TiN–(Ti, Mo, Al)N, and Cr–CrN–(Cr, Mo, Al)N. The investigation was focused on hardness, resistance to fracture during scratch tests, elemental composition, and structure of the coatings. Experiments were carried out to study the wear resistance of coated carbide tools during the turning of 1045 steel and of NiCr20TiAl heat-resistant nickel alloy. With the elemental compositions identical in the content of molybdenum (Mo) and aluminium (Al), identical thicknesses and nanolayer periods of λ, the coatings being studied demonstrated a noticeable difference in wear resistance. Both during the turning of steel and nickel-based alloy, the highest wear resistance was detected for tools with the Zr–ZrN–(Zr, Mo, Al)N coating (the tool life was 3–5 times higher than for uncoated tools). The good wear resistance of the Zr–ZrN–(Zr, Mo, Al)N coating may be related to the optimal combination of hardness and plasticity and the active formation of molybdenum oxide (MoO3) on the coating surface during the cutting, with good tribological and protective properties.

Tool Wear Analysis on Multi-Layered Coated Carbide Tools in Face Milling of AISI 1045 Steel

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyung-Hee Park ◽  
Patrick Y. Kwon
Keyword(s):  
Tool Wear ◽  
Flank Wear ◽  
Face Milling ◽  
Coating Materials ◽  
Aisi 1045 Steel ◽  
Aisi 1045 ◽  
1045 Steel ◽  
Coated Carbide ◽  
Coated Carbide Tools ◽  
Layer Coating

Face milling tests on AISI 1045 steel were performed to study the flank wear of multilayered coated carbide tools. The cutting tools were dual (TiN/TiAlN) and triple (TiN/Al2O3/TiCN) layered, coated carbide inserts processed by PVD and CVD respectively. As expected, the depth of cut (DOC) did not play an important role on the development of flank wear while the cutting speed had a significant role in the development of flank wear. Using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and wavelet transform, the flank wear evolution was analyzed and abrasive wear was found to be a dominant tool wear mechanism. Adhesion of the work material was also observed after the carbide substrate was exposed. Edge chipping and micro-fracture were additional tool failure modes. After comparing the performance of the two inserts, we concluded that the dual layer coating was superior to the triple layer coating under various cutting conditions mainly due to the benefit coming from the coating processes themselves. It was claimed that the superior performance of the multilayer coating came from preventing the gross crack-induced removal of coating materials by propagating the fracture along the coating interfaces. However, no such observations were found in our milling experiment. Therefore, the hardness of the coating materials is the most important criteria for the development of flank wear.

Wear resistance of coating materials under the frictional heating conditions

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 265-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. B. Zelentsov ◽  
B. I. Mitrin ◽  
I. A. Lubyagin
Keyword(s):  
Wear Resistance ◽  
Frictional Heating ◽  
Coating Materials

Optimum Cutting Speed for Machining Stainless Steel with Coated Carbide Tools

2006 ◽  
Vol 7 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 201-206
Author(s):  
Ahsan Ali Khan, ◽  
Roshaliza Bt Hamidon, ◽  
Muhariyanti Bt Che Mat,
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Cutting Speed ◽  
Optimum Cutting ◽  
Coated Carbide ◽  
Coated Carbide Tools

Comparative assessment between AlTiN and AlTiSiN coated carbide tools towards machinability improvement of AISI D6 steel in dry hard turning

2021 ◽  
pp. 095440622110373
Author(s):  
Anshuman Das ◽  
Miyaz Kamal ◽  
Sudhansu Ranjan Das ◽  
Saroj Kumar Patel ◽  
Asutosh Panda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cutting Force ◽  
Tool Life ◽  
Hard Turning ◽  
Flank Wear ◽  
Chip Morphology ◽  
Comparative Assessment ◽  
Carbide Tool ◽  
Crater Wear ◽  
Coated Carbide ◽  
Coated Carbide Tools

AISI D6 (hardness 65 HRC) is one of the hard-to-cut steel alloys and commonly used in mould and die making industries. In general, CBN and PCBN tools are used for machining hardened steel but its higher cost makes the use for limited applications. However, the usefulness of carbide tool with selective coatings is the best substitute having comparable tool life, and in terms of cost is approximately one-tenth of CBN tool. The present study highlights a detailed analysis on machinability investigation of hardened AISI D6 alloy die steel using newly developed SPPP-AlTiSiN coated carbide tools in finish dry turning operation. In addition, a comparative assessment has been performed based on the effectiveness of cutting tool performance of nanocomposite coating of AlTiN deposited by hyperlox PVD technique and a coating of AlTiSiN deposited by scalable pulsed power plasma (SPPP) technique. The required number of machining trials under varied cutting conditions (speed, depth of cut, feed) were based on L16 orthogonal array design which investigated the crater wear, flank wear, surface roughness, chip morphology, and cutting force in hard turning. Out of the two cutting tools, newly-developed nanocomposite (SPPP-AlTiSiN) coated carbide tool promises an improved surface finish, minimum cutting force, longer tool life due to lower value of crater & flank wears, and considerable improvement in tool life (i.e., by 47.83%). At higher cutting speeds, the crater wear length and flank wear increases whereas the surface roughness, crater wear width and cutting force decreases. Chip morphology confirmed the formation of serrated type saw tooth chips.

scholarly journals Wear Resistance and Titanium Adhesion of Cathodic Arc Deposited Multi-Component Coatings for Carbide End Mills at the Trochoidal Milling of Titanium Alloy

Technologies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina A. Volosova ◽  
Sergey V. Fyodorov ◽  
Stepan Opleshin ◽  
Mikhail Mosyanov
Keyword(s):  
Wear Resistance ◽  
Titanium Alloy ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Maximum Effect ◽  
Time To Failure ◽  
Trochoidal Milling ◽  
Cathodic Arc Deposition ◽  
End Mills ◽  
Coated Carbide ◽  
Cathodic Arc

The work was devoted to the study of the effectiveness of the application of multi-component coatings, TiN–Al/TiN, TiN–AlTiN/SiN, and CrTiN–AlTiN–AlTiCrN/SiN, obtained by cathodic arc deposition to increase the wear resistance of 6WH10F carbide end mills in trochoidal milling of titanium alloy. The surface morphology of the tool with coatings was studied using scanning electron microscopy, and surface roughness texture was estimated. Microhardness and elastic modulus of the coated carbide tool surface layer were determined by nanoindentation. The process of sticking titanium to the working surface of the tool and quantitative evaluation of end mill wear with multi-component coatings at the trochoidal strategy of milling titanium alloy was studied. The CrTiN–AlTiN–AlTiCrN/SiN coating showed the maximum value of the plasticity index at the level of 0.12. The maximum effect of reducing the wear rate was achieved when using a tool with a CrTiN –AlTiN–AlTiCrN/SiN coating when the operating time to failure of end mills was increased by 4.6 times compared to samples without coating, by 1.4 times compared with TiN–Al/TiN coating and 1.15 times compared with TiN–AlTiN/SiN coating.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document