The fate of labelled15N urea and ammonium nitrate applied to a winter wheat crop

1988 ◽  
Vol 112 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Recous ◽  
J. M. Machet ◽  
B. Mary
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Ammonium Nitrate ◽  
Wheat Crop ◽  
Winter Wheat Crop

scholarly journals The influence of different nitrogen forms and application time on winter wheat

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vita Smalstienė ◽  
Irena Pranckietienė ◽  
Rūta Dromantienė ◽  
Gvidas Šidlauskas
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Ammonium Nitrate ◽  
Triticum Aestivum L ◽  
Nitrogen Fertilizers ◽  
Wheat Crop ◽  
Nitrogen Form ◽  
Amide Nitrogen ◽  
Nitrogen Forms ◽  
Ammonium N ◽  
Winter Wheat Crop

The research was carried out at the Experimental Station of Aleksandras Stulginskis University during 2015–2016 on medium textured loamy carbonaceous leached soil – Cal(ca)ri-Epihypogleyic Luvisols. The soil of the experimental field was the following: pHKCl 6.8–7.2; phosphorus (P2O5) – 423– 429 mg kg–1; potassium (K2O) – 157–163 mg kg–1; humus – 2.47–2.82%. The researchers explored the winter wheat crop (Triticum aestivum L.) variety ‘Skagen’ fertilized with amide (N-NH2), ammonium (N-NH4) and nitrate (N-NO3) forms of nitrogen fertilizers in different tillering stages (BBCH 21–29). 7 days after winter wheat was fertilized, the level of mineral nitrogen in the soil was on average 23.9% higher using ammonium–nitrate nitrogen form fertilizers than using amide nitrogen form ones. The index of chlorophyll and the area of leafs were essentially higher when ammonium– nitrate and amide forms of nitrogen fertilizers were used. The biggest effect on the index of chlorophyll and the area of leafs was achieved 16 days after the start of vegetation when plants were fertilized with ammonium–nitrate fertilizers. Plants fertilized with ammonium–nitrate fertilizers gave the biggest yield 4 days after the start of vegetation. Data of the experiment showed strong and statistically reliable bonds of the correlation between the grain yield and the time of fertilization with nitrogen fertilizers (ήamide nitrogen fertilizers = 0.850* and ήammonium–nitrate fertilizers = 0.878*).

The fate of labelled15N urea and ammonium nitrate applied to a winter wheat crop

1988 ◽  
Vol 112 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Recous ◽  
C. Fresneau ◽  
G. Faurie ◽  
B. Mary
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Ammonium Nitrate ◽  
Wheat Crop ◽  
Winter Wheat Crop

scholarly journals Weed Control and Winter Wheat Crop Yield With the Application of Herbicides, Nitrogen Fertilizers, and Their Mixtures With Humic Growth Regulators

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irina Korotkova ◽  
Mykola Marenych ◽  
Volodymyr Hanhur ◽  
Oksana Laslo ◽  
Oksana Chetveryk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Ammonium Nitrate ◽  
Weed Control ◽  
Block Design ◽  
Nitrogen Fertilizers ◽  
Wheat Crop ◽  
Yield Increase ◽  
Physiologically Active Substances ◽  
Winter Wheat Cultivars ◽  
Winter Wheat Crop

Abstract The aim of the present study was to determine the efficacy of the application of mixtures containing various combinations of humic substances, with herbicides and nitrogen fertilizers, in weed control and optimizing the plant nutrition system. We also aimed to evaluate the influence of these substances on winter wheat productivity. Five Ukrainian winter wheat cultivars (‘Kryzhynka,’ ‘Smuhlyanka,’ ‘Slavna,’ ‘Kubus,’ and ‘Mulan’) were sown in a randomized complete block design, with three replications, in the years 2014–2019. The analysis of the effect of the compositions containing herbicides, with various physiologically active substances, in a mixture with humic preparations (Humifield, 4R Foliar concentrate) was performed by counting weeds per square meter in each experimental plot. The best performance in weed control, including perennial species, was obtained from using a mixture of Grodil Maxi herbicide with the humic preparation, Humifield. The crop treatment of this mixture resulted in a 23.6% reduction in weeds, compared to the treatment with the Grodil Maxi herbicide only. At the same time, the complex application of a number of herbicides in a mixture with the humic preparation, 4R Foliar concentrate led to the opposite effect. Various applications of mixtures of humates (4R Foliar concentrate, 5R SoilBoost) with nitrogen fertilizers (ammonium nitrate; carbamide-ammonium mixture) to optimize the winter wheat nutritional system and yield increases have been studied. The highest yield increase of 20%–22% was harvested in the plots treated with 5R SoilBoost and 4R Foliar concentrate plus ammonium nitrate. In addition, the efficacy of wheat crop foliar feeding with mixtures of humates, plus a carbamide-ammonia mixture, in different phases of vegetation has been established. A yield increase of 10.0%–21.4% resulting from the use of such compositions was obtained.

The herbicide NordStrim on a winter wheat crop

2021 ◽  
pp. 21-22
Author(s):  
V.A. Nesterenko ◽  
T.S. Krylova
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Wheat Crop ◽  
Winter Wheat Crop

Characterisation of fungal diseases on winter wheat crop using proximal and remote multispectral imaging

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Bebronne ◽  
A. Michez ◽  
V. Leemans ◽  
P. Vermeulen ◽  
B. Dumont ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Multispectral Imaging ◽  
Fungal Diseases ◽  
Wheat Crop ◽  
Winter Wheat Crop

Effect of Winter Wheat Crop Residue on No-Till Corn Growth and Development

2007 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
pp. 549-555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anatoliy G. Kravchenko ◽  
Kurt D. Thelen
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Growth And Development ◽  
Crop Residue ◽  
Wheat Crop ◽  
No Till ◽  
Winter Wheat Crop

scholarly journals Winter wheat crop water consumption and its effect on yields in southern Romania, in the very dry 2019-2020 agricultural year

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 12309
Author(s):  
Mihai BERCA ◽  
Valentina-Ofelia ROBESCU ◽  
Roxana HOROIAS
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Water Consumption ◽  
Soil Depth ◽  
Vegetation Period ◽  
Early Summer ◽  
Wheat Crop ◽  
Soil Drought ◽  
Crop Water ◽  
Winter Wheat Crop ◽  
Crop Water Consumption

Researches on winter wheat in the south part of Romanian Plain during the dry years 2019 and 2020 have been focused on the crop water consumption issue in excessive conditions of air and soil drought. The wheat crop water consumption in the research sites (Calarasi and Teleorman counties), for the entire vegetation period, autumn – spring – summer, is between 1000 and 1050 m3 of water for each ton of wheat produced. Only in the spring-summer period, the wheat extracts a quantity of about 5960 m3 ha-1, i.e. 851 m3 t-1. The useful water reserve is normally located at about 1500 m3/ha-1, at a soil depth of 0-150 cm. In the spring of 2020, it has been below 400 m3 ha-1, so that at the beginning of May the soil moisture had almost reached the wilting coefficient (WC). Wheat plants have been able to survive the thermal and water shock of late spring - early summer, due to enhanced thermal alternation between air and soil. For a period of about 34 days, this alternation brought the plants 1-1.5 mm water, i.e. approximately 442 m3 ha-1, which allowed the prolongation of the plant’s agony until the rains of the second half of May. Yields have been, depending on the variety, between 1500 and 3000 kg ha-1, in average, covering only 60% of the crop costs. Other measures to save water in the soil have also been proposed in the paper.

Аgroclimatic conditions for formation of the winter wheat crop in the territory of the south federal district

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. F. Asaulyak ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Federal District ◽  
Meteorological Station ◽  
Wheat Crop ◽  
The South ◽  
Winter Wheat Crop

An assessment of the dynamics of the average regional yield and the climatic component of winter wheat yields in the territory of the Southern Federal District has been carried out. The dynamics of the duration of dry and dry periods was determined according to the data of the Krasnodar meteorological station.

scholarly journals Influence of Soil Background on Spectral Reflectance of Winter Wheat Crop Canopy

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (16) ◽  
pp. 1932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Prudnikova ◽  
Igor Savin ◽  
Gretelerika Vindeker ◽  
Praskovia Grubina ◽  
Ekaterina Shishkonakova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Winter Wheat ◽  
Soil Type ◽  
Spectral Reflectance ◽  
Vegetation Index ◽  
Vegetation Indices ◽  
Soil Surface ◽  
Wheat Crop ◽  
Crop Canopy ◽  
Winter Wheat Crop ◽  
Type Factor

The spectral reflectance of crop canopy is a spectral mixture, which includes soil background as one of the components. However, as soil is characterized by substantial spatial variability and temporal dynamics, its contribution to the spectral reflectance of crops will also vary. The aim of the research was to determine the impact of soil background on spectral reflectance of crop canopy in visible and near-infrared parts of the spectrum at different stages of crop development and how the soil type factor and the dynamics of soil surface affect vegetation indices calculated for crop assessment. The study was conducted on three test plots with winter wheat located in the Tula region of Russia and occupied by three contrasting types of soil. During field trips, information was collected on the spectral reflectance of winter wheat crop canopy, winter wheat leaves, weeds and open soil surface for three phenological phases (tillering, shooting stage, milky ripeness). The assessment of the soil contribution to the spectral reflectance of winter wheat crop canopy was based on a linear spectral mixture model constructed from field data. This showed that the soil background effect is most pronounced in the regions of 350–500 nm and 620–690 nm. In the shooting stage, the contribution of the soil prevails in the 620–690 nm range of the spectrum and the phase of milky ripeness in the region of 350–500 nm. The minimum contribution at all stages of winter wheat development was observed at wavelengths longer than 750 nm. The degree of soil influence varies with soil type. Analysis of variance showed that normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) was least affected by soil type factor, the influence of which was about 30%–50%, depending on the stage of winter wheat development. The influence of soil type on soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI) and enhanced vegetation index (EVI2) was approximately equal and varied from 60% (shooting phase) to 80% (tillering phase). According to the discriminant analysis, the ability of vegetation indices calculated for winter wheat crop canopy to distinguish between winter wheat crops growing on different soil types changed from the classification accuracy of 94.1% (EVI2) in the tillering stage to 75% (EVI2 and SAVI) in the shooting stage to 82.6% in the milky ripeness stage (EVI2, SAVI, NDVI). The range of the sensitivity of the vegetation indices to the soil background depended on soil type. The indices showed the greatest sensitivity on gray forest soil when the wheat was in the phase of milky ripeness, and on leached chernozem when the wheat was in the tillering phase. The observed patterns can be used to develop vegetation indices, invariant to second-type soil variations caused by soil type factor, which can be applied for the remote assessment of the state of winter wheat crops.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document