Characteristics of Minority Members of the American Economic Association

1988 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 77-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur M. Diamond

Evidence from the data tape for the 1985 Directory of the American Economic Association indicates that blacks and women remain underrepresented compared to their numbers in the general population. Although we present some limited evidence of increased representation of these minorities, the finding of underrepresentation is robust when we look at other measures of career status such as rank achieved or status of institution of employment. A fuller understanding of the determinants of minority participation within the economics profession will require that the data presented here be combined with data from other sources on productivity, salaries, and labor market alternatives.

1998 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 175-176

The Committee on the Status of Women in the Economics Profession recently celebrated its 25th anniversary. Here, we republish the text of the resolution that created CSWEP, along with comments on the role of CSWEP in the economics profession from Robin L. Bartlett, Barbara R. Bergmann, Carolyn Shaw Bell, and Milton Friedman.


FEDS Notes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (2961) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen E. Meade ◽  
◽  
Martha Starr ◽  
Cynthia Bansak ◽  
◽  
...  

The shortage of women and historically underrepresented racial and ethnic groups in the economics profession has received considerable public attention in the past several years. The American Economic Association (AEA), the professional organization for economists, has been taking steps to address criticism that the economics discipline is unwelcoming to women and underrepresented minorities.


Author(s):  
Jessica Carrick-Hagenbarth ◽  
Gerald Epstein

Conflicts of interest in the economics profession received attention after the Great Financial Crisis of 2008. There is evidence that some academic economists hold one or more significant financial interests in addition to their university positions. We argue the economics profession must adopt and codify rules to deal with potential conflicts of interest. Economists should disclose all potential conflicts of interest in their publications, presentations, interviews, and in Congressional testimony. The economics profession must delineate situations when disclosure is not sufficient and complete avoidance of the conflict of interest must occur. For conflicts of interest policies to be effective, disclosure and avoidance requirements need to be monitored and enforced. In lieu of a licensing agency, this can be accomplished by a combination of university conflicts of interest policies, a professional conflict of interest policy, rules by journals, such as those published by the American Economic Association, and research organizations, such as the National Bureau for Economic Research.


2012 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 339-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
ROBERT W. DIMAND ◽  
GEOFFREY BLACK

The outspoken social reformer Mary Clare de Graffenreid (born 1849, died 1921) stood out among the handful of early women members of the American Economic Association (founded 1885) as the winner of two essay competitions. In 1889, Clare de Graffrenreid’s essay shared the $100 first prize in an AEA essay competition on child labor, and appeared the following year in the Publications of the American Economic Association (1st series, 5, 2, March 1890, pp. 194–271). In 1891 her essay “The Condition of Wage-Earning Women” (published in Forum 15, March 1893, pp. 68–82) won the $300 first prize in an AEA essay competition on women workers (the $200 second prize went to Helen Campbell’s “Women Wage Earners,” 1893). Her valedictory address at Wesleyan Female College in Macon, Georgia, in 1865 provided her first taste of public controversy, as the general commanding Union troops in the area responded by placing the college under guard and threatening to close it, but by far the most controversial of her twenty-seven publications was “The Georgia Cracker in the Cotton Mill” (Century Magazine, February 1891). This paper examines de Graffenreid’s career and contributions, and what her career reveals about the paths for women to participate in the AEA and the American economics profession in the late nineteenth century. After teaching Latin, literature, and mathematics for a decade at Georgetown Female Seminary, de Graffenreid had a non-academic career as an investigator with the Bureau of Labor (from 1888, Department of Labor) from 1886 until she retired in 1906. Despite her AEA prizes, her published lectures to other conferences (YWCA, National Conference of Charities and Correction), and her published testimony to the Industrial Commission on the Relations of Capital and Labor, she was never on the program of an AEA meeting. Like other women economists of her time, de Graffenreid crossed boundaries between scholarly research and social reform, and between different scholarly disciplines (e.g., publishing “Some Social Economic Problems” in American Journal of Sociology, 1896). The paper examines how essay competitions provided women such as de Graffenreid and Campbell (and Julie-Victoire Daubié and Clémence Royer in France) with a voice in the predominately male economics profession of the late nineteenth century.


2020 ◽  
Vol 110 ◽  
pp. 205-209
Author(s):  
Donna K. Ginther ◽  
Janet M. Currie ◽  
Francine D. Blau ◽  
Rachel T. A. Croson

Women continue to be underrepresented in academic ranks in the economics profession. The Committee on the Status of Women in the Economics Profession of the American Economic Association established the CeMENT mentoring workshop to support women in research careers. The program was designed as a randomized controlled trial. This study evaluates differences between the treatment and control groups in career outcomes. Results indicate that relative to women in the control group, treated women are more likely to stay in academia and more likely to have received tenure in an institution ranked in the top 30 or 50 in economics in the world.


2011 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 751-753 ◽  

John J. Siegfried of University of Adelaide and American Economic Association reviews “Big-Time Sports in American Universities” by Charles T. Clotfelter. The EconLit Abstract of the reviewed work begins “Examines the phenomenon of prominent, commercialized university-sponsored athletic enterprises and considers the consequences for the universities that operate them. Discusses strange bedfellows; priorities; the bigness of “big time;” consumer good, mass obsession; commercial enterprise; an institution builder; a beacon for campus culture; ends and means; and prospects for reform. Clotfelter is Z. Smith Reynolds Professor of Public Policy and Professor of Economic and Law at Duke University. Index.”


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document