scholarly journals Osteoporotic mid-thoracic vertebral body fractures: what are the differences compared to fractures of the lumbar spine?—a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich Josef Spiegl ◽  
Max Joseph Scheyerer ◽  
Georg Osterhoff ◽  
Sebastian Grüninger ◽  
Klaus John Schnake
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Vertebral Body ◽  
Thoracic Spine ◽  
Regional Blood Flow ◽  
Thoracolumbar Spine ◽  
Osteoporotic Fractures ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Vertebral Body Fractures

Abstract Purpose The aim of this systematically review is to detect differences between fractures located at the mid-thoracic spine compared to fractures of the thoracolumbar junction (TLJ) and the lumbar spine in osteoporotic vertebral body fractures. Methods This review is based on articles retrieved by a systematic search in the PubMed and Web of Science database for publications regarding osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine with respect to the fracture location. Differences in prevalence, cause of fracture, fracture healing, and outcomes between the mid-thoracic spine and the TLJ and the lumbar spine were considered. Results Altogether, 238 articles could be retrieved from the literature search. A total of 222 articles were excluded. Thus, 16 remaining original articles were included in this systematic review comprising the topics prevalence, bone mineral density and regional blood flow, biomechanics, subsequent fractures, and outcome, respectively. The overall level of evidence of the vast majority of studies was moderate to low. Conclusion Several differences between osteoporotic fractures of the mid-thoracic spine compared to the TLJ and the lumbar spine could be identified. Thereby, osteoporotic mid-thoracic fractures seem to be particularly more related to frailty without a history of traumatic injury compared to osteoporotic fractures of the TLJ and the lumbar spine. Additionally, the presence of severe mid-thoracic fractures predicts subsequent fractures of the hip. In contrast, subsequent fractures of the spine are less likely.

scholarly journals MDCT-Based Finite Element Analyses: Are Measurements at the Lumbar Spine Associated with the Biomechanical Strength of Functional Spinal Units of Incidental Osteoporotic Fractures along the Thoracolumbar Spine?

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 455
Author(s):  
Nico Sollmann ◽  
Nithin Manohar Rayudu ◽  
Long Yu Yeung ◽  
Anjany Sekuboyina ◽  
Egon Burian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element ◽  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Fracture Risk ◽  
Thoracolumbar Spine ◽  
Areal Bone Mineral Density ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Biomechanical Strength

Assessment of osteoporosis-associated fracture risk during clinical routine is based on the evaluation of clinical risk factors and T-scores, as derived from measurements of areal bone mineral density (aBMD). However, these parameters are limited in their ability to identify patients at high fracture risk. Finite element models (FEMs) have shown to improve bone strength prediction beyond aBMD. This study aims to investigate whether FEM measurements at the lumbar spine can predict the biomechanical strength of functional spinal units (FSUs) with incidental osteoporotic vertebral fractures (VFs) along the thoracolumbar spine. Multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) data of 11 patients (5 females and 6 males, median age: 67 years) who underwent MDCT twice (median interval between baseline and follow-up MDCT: 18 months) and sustained an incidental osteoporotic VF between baseline and follow-up scanning were used. Based on baseline MDCT data, two FSUs consisting of vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs (IVDs) were modeled: one standardly capturing L1-IVD–L2-IVD–L3 (FSU_L1–L3) and one modeling the incidentally fractured vertebral body at the center of the FSU (FSU_F). Furthermore, volumetric BMD (vBMD) derived from MDCT, FEM-based displacement, and FEM-based load of the single vertebrae L1 to L3 were determined. Statistically significant correlations (adjusted for a BMD ratio of fracture/L1–L3 segments) were revealed between the FSU_F and mean load of L1 to L3 (r = 0.814, p = 0.004) and the mean vBMD of L1 to L3 (r = 0.745, p = 0.013), whereas there was no statistically significant association between the FSU_F and FSU_L1–L3 or between FSU_F and the mean displacement of L1 to L3 (p > 0.05). In conclusion, FEM measurements of single vertebrae at the lumbar spine may be able to predict the biomechanical strength of incidentally fractured vertebral segments along the thoracolumbar spine, while FSUs seem to predict only segment-specific fracture risk.

The Effect of Calcium or Calcium and Vitamin D Supplementation on Bone Mineral Density in Healthy Males: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 510-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie N. Silk ◽  
David A. Greene ◽  
Michael K. Baker
Keyword(s):  
Bone Mineral Density ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Vitamin D ◽  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Calcium Supplementation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Vitamin D Supplementation ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Total Body ◽  
Healthy Males

Research examining the preventative effects of calcium and vitamin D supplementation has focused on children and females, leaving the effects on male bone mineral density (BMD) largely unexplored. Thus, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to examine the efficacy of calcium supplementation, with or without vitamin D for improving BMD in healthy males. Medline, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, Academic Search Complete, CINHAHL Plus and PubMed databases were searched for studies including healthy males which provided participants calcium supplementation with or without vitamin D and used changes to BMD as the primary outcome measure. Between trial standardized mean differences of percentage change from baseline in BMD of femoral neck, lumbar spine, total body and total hip sites were calculated. Nine studies were included in the systematic review with six references totaling 867 participants contributing to the meta-analysis. Significant pooled effects size (ES) for comparison between supplementation and control groups were found at all sites included in the meta-analysis. The largest effect was found in total body (ES = 0.644; 95% CI = 0.406–0.883; p < .001), followed by total hip (ES = 0.483, 95% CI= 0.255–0.711, p < .001), femoral neck (ES = 0.402, 95% CI = 0.233–0.570, p = .000) and lumbar spine (ES = 0.306, 95% CI = 0.173–0.440, p < .001). Limited evidence appears to support the use of calcium and vitamin D supplementation for improving BMD in older males. There is a need for high quality randomized controlled trials, especially in younger and middle-aged male cohorts and athletic populations to determine whether supplementation provides a preventative benefit.

scholarly journals Effect of Bisphosphonates on Bone Health in Adult Renal Transplant Patients: Beyond the First Year Posttransplant—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 205435811985801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alyssa Lip ◽  
Ashley Warias ◽  
M. Khaled Shamseddin ◽  
Benjamin Thomson ◽  
D. Thiwanka Wijeratne
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Renal Transplant ◽  
Bone Health ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
First Year ◽  
Bisphosphonate Treatment ◽  
Mineral Density

Background: Bone mineral density (BMD) decreases postrenal transplantation. Evidence demonstrating the effects of bisphosphonates on BMD and fracture risk beyond 1-year posttransplant is sparse in existing literature, but remains essential to enhance clinical outcomes in this population. Objective: Our study aimed to systematically review and meta-analyze the current literature on the use of any bisphosphonate in the adult renal transplant population beyond the first year of renal transplant to determine its effect on BMD and fracture incidence. Design: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of primary research literature that included full-text, English-language, original randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies. Setting: Patient data were primarily captured in an outpatient setting across various studies. Patients: Our population of interest was patients older than 18 years who received deceased/living donor kidney transplantation and any bisphosphonate with a follow-up greater than 12 months posttransplantation. Measurements: The primary outcome was change in BMD from baseline. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of fractures and effects of other confounders on bone health. Methods: We included RCTs and observational studies that satisfied our inclusion criteria. Each study was analyzed for risk of bias and data were extrapolated to analyze for overall statistical significance accounting for heterogeneity of studies. Results: Sixteen studies (N = 1762) were analyzed. The follow-up ranged from 12 to 98 months. There was a nonsignificant improvement in BMD with bisphosphonate treatment persisting into the second and third years posttransplant at the lumbar spine. The calculated standardized mean BMD difference was −0.29 (−0.75 to 0.17), P = .22. Only 5 studies reported a total of 43 new fractures. Prednisone ( P < .01), low body weight ( P < .001), low body mass index ( P < .01), and male gender ( P < .05) correlated with reduced lumbar and femoral BMD. Limitations: Limitations of this review include the use of BMD as a surrogate outcome, the bias of the included studies, and the incomplete reporting data in numerous analyzed studies. Conclusions: We demonstrate no statistically significant benefit of bisphosphonate treatment on BMD beyond the first year postrenal transplantation. Despite heterogeneity of treatment, a differential nonsignificant improvement in lumbar spine BMD was consistent and may be clinically relevant. Trial Registration: PROSPERO CRD42019125593

scholarly journals A Systematic Review of Treatment Strategies for the Prevention of Junctional Complications After Long-Segment Fusions in the Osteoporotic Spine

2020 ◽  
pp. 219256822093990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murray Echt ◽  
William Ranson ◽  
Jeremy Steinberger ◽  
Reza Yassari ◽  
Samuel K. Cho
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Thoracolumbar Spine ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Compression Fracture ◽  
Deformity Correction ◽  
Preventive Treatment ◽  
Cement Augmentation ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Junctional Kyphosis

Study Design: Systematic review Objectives: Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and proximal junctional failure (PJF) are well-known complications after long-segment fusions in the thoracolumbar spine of osteoporotic patients. Recent advances in anti-resorptive and anabolic medications, instrumentation, surgical technique, and cement augmentation have all aided in the avoidance of junctional kyphosis. In this article, current literature on the prevention of PJK and PJF in the osteoporotic spine is reviewed. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted using the PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase databases in order to search for the current preventive treatment methods for PJK and PJF published in the literature (1985 to present). Inclusion criteria included (1) published in English, (2) at least 1-year mean and median follow-up, (3) preoperative diagnosis of osteoporosis, (4) at least 3 levels instrumented, and (5) studies of medical treatment or surgical techniques for prevention of junctional kyphosis. Results: The review of the literature yielded 7 studies with low levels of evidence ranging from level II to IV. Treatment strategies reviewed addressed prophylaxis against ligamentous failure, adjacent vertebral compression fracture, and/or bone-implant interface failure. This includes studies on the effect of osteoporosis medication, cement augmentation, multi-rod constructs, and posterior-tension band supplementation. The role of perioperative teriparatide therapy maintains the highest level of evidence. Conclusions: Perioperative teriparatide therapy represents the strongest evidence for preventive treatment, and further clinical trials are warranted. Use of cement augmentation, sublaminar tethers, and multi-rod constructs have low or insufficient evidence for recommendations. Future guidelines for adult spinal deformity correction may consider bone mineral density–adjusted alignment goals.

scholarly journals HYPOVITAMINOSIS D AND MENOPAUSE: STILL AN ISSUE IN 2016?

2016 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-210
Author(s):  
Adina Ghemigian ◽  
◽  
Otilia Radu ◽  
Ana Valea ◽  
Nicoleta Dumitru ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Vitamin D ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Osteoporotic Fractures ◽  
Hypovitaminosis D ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Knowing That ◽  
Risk Increase ◽  
Risk Of Falls

Vitamin D in menopause is essential for skeleton and metabolic involvement. Our purpose is to introduce the level of evidence regarding menopause – related hypovitaminosis D through a brief review of papers published on PubMed in 2016. The correlation between low vitamin D and risk of falls is a traditional observation. Lack of vitamin D remains one of the major contributors to osteoporotic fractures which have an annual incidence of 8.9 million worldwide. Yale FIT trial referring to menopausal cancer survivors after 12 months of aerobic physical exercise confirmed the bone loss under aromatase inhibitors opposite to tamoxifen is significant, a bone loss that is lower if vitamin D ranges are low. Arzoxifene Generations Trial followed for 5 years menopausal women treated only with vitamin D and calcium and found a fracture risk increase by 46% for each unit of lumbar T-score that decreases. A meta-analysis of 34 studies on 11,090 patients treated with ibandronate showed that hypovitaminosis D at baseline is a predictor of bone mineral density improvement only at lumbar spine. Another study revealed that 77% of menopausal females have 25-hydoxyvitamin D (25-OH D) less than 30 ng/mL while a negative correlation between 25-OH D and waist circumference was found knowing that android fat disposition in women with hipovitaminosis D is a hallmark of metabolic syndrome. Overall, in 2016, PubMed published papers regarding vitamin D in menopause still reflect its deficiency and associated metabolic risk.

scholarly journals Iatrogenic lesions of the skeleton

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 19-25
Author(s):  
Galina A. Melnichenko ◽  
Elizaveta O. Mamedova
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Fracture Risk ◽  
Bone Metabolism ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
Osteoporotic Fractures ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Important Public Health Problem

Osteoporotic fractures are an important public health problem due to their negative impact on the quality of life and life expectancy, as well as high cost of treatment and rehabilitation. Along with the major risk factors for osteoporotic fractures, such as low bone mineral density (BMD), age, low body weight, frequent falls and previous fractures, an important secondary risk factor, especially among susceptible individuals, is taking certain medications. The difficulty in assessing fracture risk when taking various drugs, as well as the development of appropriate methods of prevention and treatment, is often due to the absence of large randomized trials with a sufficient level of evidence, as well as the heterogeneity of the main risk factors for fractures in studied groups of patients. We focus on the main groups of drugs for which there is evidence of a negative impact on bone metabolism, BMD and fracture risk. In addition to drugs, bone metabolism is also influenced by bariatric surgery, transplantation of solid organs, gonadectomy for various diseases. This article is the RePrint from the original publication in Obesity and Metabolism 2016; 13(2); pp. 41-47. doi: 10.14341/omet2016241-47

scholarly journals Age-related changes in bone tissue in men

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 62-69
Author(s):  
A.S. Musiienko ◽  
N.V. Zaverukha
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Bone Tissue ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Osteoporotic Fractures ◽  
State Institution ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Healthy Men ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Age Related Changes

The purpose of the study was to establish age-related changes of male bone tissue. Materials and methods. The study was conducted by the Department of Clinical Physiology and Pathology of the Musculoskeletal System of the State Institution “D.F. Chebotarev Institute of Gerontology by the National Aca­demy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine”. It involved 342 healthy men aged 20 to 89 years without osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures or any pathology with a confirmed impact on bone tissue, as well as any somatic pathology in the sub- and decompensation. The following methods of examination were used: questionnaire, anthropometric measurements, clinical and instrumental examination. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry machine “Prodigy, GEНС Lunar” at the level of the entire skeleton, lumbar spine (L1-L4), proximal femur and femoral neck, distal and ultra-distal forearm bones. Results. We have detected a significant 14.8 % decrease of BMD at the level of femoral neck in the group of men aged 60–69 years, by 20 % in the group of men aged 70–79 years, and by 24.1 % in the group of men aged 80–89 years compared to the men aged 20–29 years; at the same time, at the lumbar spine there was re­gistered a decrease of this parameter by 1.6 % in men aged 60–69 years, by 1.9 % in men of 70–79 years and by 0.8 % in men of 80–89 years, respectively. Among the examined practically healthy men, the bone tissue remained at the normal level relative to age in 67.8 %; osteopenia was detected in 27.8 %, and osteoporosis in 4.4 %. Conclusions. An age-associated BMD reduction was registered at various skeletal sites in the practically healthy men wi­thout any clinically significant factors affecting bone tissue metabolism. The most pronounced BMD loss was observed at the level of fe­moral neck. At the same time, 4.4 % of examined had osteoporosis without any clinical signs.

scholarly journals Dorsal instrumentation with and without vertebral body replacement in patients with thoracolumbar osteoporotic fractures shows comparable outcome measures

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maximilian Schwendner ◽  
Stefan Motov ◽  
Yu-Mi Ryang ◽  
Bernhard Meyer ◽  
Sandro M. Krieg
Keyword(s):  
Vertebral Body ◽  
Thoracolumbar Spine ◽  
Osteoporotic Fractures ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Vertebral Body Replacement ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Dorsal Instrumentation ◽  
The Individual

Abstract Purpose In the surgical treatment of osteoporotic spine fractures, there is no clear recommendation, which treatment is best for the individual patient with vertebra plana and/or neurological deficit requiring instrumentation. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes after dorsal or 360° instrumentation of osteoporotic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine in a cohort of patients representing clinical reality. Methods A total of 116 consecutive patients were operated on between 2008 and 2020. Inclusion criteria were osteoporotic fracture, thoracolumbar location, and dorsal instrumentation. In 79 cases, vertebral body replacement (VBR) was performed additionally. Patient outcomes including complications, EQ-5D at follow-up, and sagittal correction were analyzed. Results Medical and surgical complications occurred in 59.5% of patients with 360° instrumentation compared to 64.9% of patients with dorsal instrumentation only (p = 0.684). Dorsal instrumentation plus VBR resulted in a sagittal correction of 9.3 ± 7.4° (0.1–31.6°) compared to 6.0 ± 5.6° (0.2–22.8°) after dorsal instrumentation only, respectively (p = 0.0065). EQ-5D was completed by 79 patients after 4.00 ± 2.88 years (0.1–11.8 years) and was 0.56 ± 0.32 (− 0.21–1.00) for VBR compared to 0.56 ± 0.34 (− 0.08–1.00) without VBR after dorsal instrumentation (p = 0.994). Conclusion 360° instrumentation represents a legitimate surgical technique with no additional morbidity even for the elderly and multimorbid osteoporotic population. Particularly, if sufficient long-term construct stability is in doubt or ventral stenosis is present, there is no need to abstain from additional ventral reinforcement and decompression.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document