scholarly journals Stress, sex hormones, inflammation, and major depressive disorder: Extending Social Signal Transduction Theory of Depression to account for sex differences in mood disorders

2019 ◽  
Vol 236 (10) ◽  
pp. 3063-3079 ◽  
Author(s):  
George M. Slavich ◽  
Julia Sacher
CNS Spectrums ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 231-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark J. Niciu ◽  
Dawn F. Ionescu ◽  
Daniel C. Mathews ◽  
Erica M. Richards ◽  
Carlos A. Zarate

The etiopathogenesis and treatment of major mood disorders have historically focused on modulation of monoaminergic (serotonin, norepinephrine, dopamine) and amino acid [γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), glutamate] receptors at the plasma membrane. Although the activation and inhibition of these receptors acutely alter local neurotransmitter levels, their neuropsychiatric effects are not immediately observed. This time lag implicates intracellular neuroplasticity as primary in the mechanism of action of antidepressants and mood stabilizers. The modulation of intracellular second messenger/signal transduction cascades affects neurotrophic pathways that are both necessary and sufficient for monoaminergic and amino acid–based treatments. In this review, we will discuss the evidence in support of intracellular mediators in the pathophysiology and treatment of preclinical models of despair and major depressive disorder (MDD). More specifically, we will focus on the following pathways: cAMP/PKA/CREB, neurotrophin-mediated (MAPK and others), p11, Wnt/Fz/Dvl/GSK3β, and NFκB/ΔFosB. We will also discuss recent discoveries with rapidly acting antidepressants, which activate the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and release of inhibition on local translation via elongation factor stimulation. Throughout this discourse, we will highlight potential intracellular targets for therapeutic intervention. Finally, future clinical implications are discussed.


2015 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Papmeyer ◽  
Stephen Giles ◽  
Jessica E. Sussmann ◽  
Shauna Kielty ◽  
Tiffany Stewart ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 1319-1323 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. MANGWETH ◽  
J. I. HUDSON ◽  
H. G. POPE ◽  
A. HAUSMANN ◽  
C. De COL ◽  
...  

Background. Family studies have suggested that eating disorders and mood disorders may coaggregate in families. To study further this question, data from a family interview study of probands with and without major depressive disorder was examined.Method. A bivariate proband predictive logistic regression model was applied to data from a family interview study, conducted in Innsbruck, Austria, of probands with (N=64) and without (N=58) major depressive disorder, together with 330 of their first-degree relatives.Results. The estimated odds ratio (OR) for the familial aggregation of eating disorders (anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa and binge-eating disorder) was 7·0 (95% CI 1·4, 28; P=0·006); the OR for the familial aggregation of mood disorders (major depression and bipolar disorder) was 2·2 (0·92, 5·4; P=0·076); and for the familial coaggregation of eating disorders with mood disorders the OR was 2·2 (1·1, 4·6; P=0·035).Conclusions. The familial coaggregation of eating disorders with mood disorders was significant and of the same magnitude as the aggregation of mood disorders alone – suggesting that eating disorders and mood disorders have common familial causal factors.


2013 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 733-739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lingtao Kong ◽  
Kaiyuan Chen ◽  
Fay Womer ◽  
Wenyan Jiang ◽  
Xingguang Luo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document