scholarly journals NPP-ID: Non-Pollen Palynomorph Image Database as a research and educational platform

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lyudmila S. Shumilovskikh ◽  
Elena S. Shumilovskikh ◽  
Frank Schlütz ◽  
Bas van Geel
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Pollen Grains ◽  
Numerical Data ◽  
Image Database ◽  
Research Project ◽  
Resting Stages ◽  
Biological Objects ◽  
Open Research ◽  
Large Numbers ◽  
Diverse World

AbstractNon-pollen palynomorphs (NPPs) form a large group of biological objects found in palynological slides besides pollen grains. This includes various remains of algae and fungi, shells, resting stages and eggs of invertebrates, among others. Publications of NPP-types started in the 1970s with studies of BvG and colleagues, and large numbers of new types continue to be published every year. For an overview of this diverse world of “extra fossils”, we created the Non-Pollen Palynomorph Image Database (NPP-ID) to gather NPP knowledge, structured by acronyms and known taxonomy to assist identification and palaeoecological interpretation (https://nonpollenpalynomorphs.tsu.ru/). An integral part is a database of illustrations, descriptions and ecological background of NPPs. While numerical data are routinely stored in open access repositories, the NPP-ID enables the definitions, identification and interpretation of the NPP taxa to be shared. The NPP-ID operates as an open research project aiming to provide open access to descriptions and illustrations of NPPs. However, due to publication rights, access to some original images is restricted and registration by users is required. We encourage palynologists to contribute to the further growth of the database by uploading their own microphotographs or drawings under an open access license. Contributors will be acknowledged by co-authorship in publications on updates of the NPP-ID.

Author Processing Charges: Barriers to Open Research, Barriers to Progress

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin O’Hanlon
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Open Access ◽  
Open Research ◽  
The Future

Presentation slides from Metropolitan New York Library Council Open Access Symposium: "The Future Is Open Access, but How Do We Get There?: A Symposium." September 12-13, 2019. New York. NY.

scholarly journals Práticas e percepções dos pesquisadores brasileiros sobre serviços de acesso aberto a dados de pesquisa | Practices and perceptions of Brazilian researchers on open access to research data

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia Elisa Caregnato ◽  
Samile Andrea de Souza Vanz ◽  
Caterina Groposo Pavão ◽  
Paula Caroline Jardim Schifino Passos ◽  
Eduardo Borges ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Data Sharing ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Exploratory Analysis ◽  
Data Reuse ◽  
Institutional Repositories ◽  
Open Research

RESUMO O artigo apresenta análise exploratória das práticas e das percepções a respeito do acesso aberto a dados de pesquisa embasada em dados coletados por meio de survey, realizada com pesquisadores brasileiros. As 4.676 respostas obtidas demonstram que, apesar do grande interesse pelo tema, evidenciado pela prevalência de variáveis relacionadas ao compartilhamento e ao uso de dados e aos repositórios institucionais, não há clareza por parte dos sujeitos sobre os principais tópicos relacionados. Conclui-se que, apesar da maioria dos pesquisadores afirmar que compartilha dados de pesquisa, a disponibilização desses dados de forma aberta e irrestrita ainda não é amplamente aceita.Palavras-chave: Dados Abertos de Pesquisa; Compartilhamento de Dados; Reuso de Dados.ABSTRACT This article presents an exploratory analysis of the practices and perceptions regarding open access to research data based on information collected by a survey with Brazilian researchers. The 4,676 responses show that, despite the great interest in the topic, evidenced by the prevalence of variables related to data sharing and use and to institutional repositories, there is no clarity on the part of the subjects on the main related topics. We conclude that, although the majority of the researchers share research data, the availability of this data in an open and unrestricted way is not yet widely accepted.Keywords: Open Research Data; Data Sharing; Data Reuse.

scholarly journals Open Science in the Humanities, or: Open Humanities?

Publications ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcel Knöchelmann
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Scholarly Communication ◽  
Open Science ◽  
Essential Elements ◽  
Research Practices ◽  
Open Research ◽  
Scientific Disciplines ◽  
Communication Practices ◽  
Do So

Open science refers to both the practices and norms of more open and transparent communication and research in scientific disciplines and the discourse on these practices and norms. There is no such discourse dedicated to the humanities. Though the humanities appear to be less coherent as a cluster of scholarship than the sciences are, they do share unique characteristics which lead to distinct scholarly communication and research practices. A discourse on making these practices more open and transparent needs to take account of these characteristics. The prevalent scientific perspective in the discourse on more open practices does not do so, which confirms that the discourse’s name, open science, indeed excludes the humanities so that talking about open science in the humanities is incoherent. In this paper, I argue that there needs to be a dedicated discourse for more open research and communication practices in the humanities, one that integrates several elements currently fragmented into smaller, unconnected discourses (such as on open access, preprints, or peer review). I discuss three essential elements of open science—preprints, open peer review practices, and liberal open licences—in the realm of the humanities to demonstrate why a dedicated open humanities discourse is required.

scholarly journals How open science helps researchers succeed

eLife ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin C McKiernan ◽  
Philip E Bourne ◽  
C Titus Brown ◽  
Stuart Buck ◽  
Amye Kenall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Open Source ◽  
Open Data ◽  
Open Science ◽  
Review Literature ◽  
Research Practices ◽  
Media Attention ◽  
Open Research ◽  
Job Opportunities ◽  
Funding Opportunities

Open access, open data, open source and other open scholarship practices are growing in popularity and necessity. However, widespread adoption of these practices has not yet been achieved. One reason is that researchers are uncertain about how sharing their work will affect their careers. We review literature demonstrating that open research is associated with increases in citations, media attention, potential collaborators, job opportunities and funding opportunities. These findings are evidence that open research practices bring significant benefits to researchers relative to more traditional closed practices.

scholarly journals Novel Computed Tomography-based tools reliably quantify plant reproductive investment

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yannick M. Staedler ◽  
Thomas Kreisberger ◽  
Sara Manafzadeh ◽  
Marion Chartier ◽  
Stephan Handschuh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Reproductive Investment ◽  
Pollen Grains ◽  
New Techniques ◽  
Pollen Counts ◽  
Fertilization Rates ◽  
Broad Applicability ◽  
Large Numbers ◽  
Reproductive Unit ◽  
Difficult Cases

AbstractThe flower is a bisexual reproductive unit where both genders compete for resources. Counting pollen and ovules in flowers is essential to understand how much is invested in each gender. Classical methods to count very numerous pollen grains and ovules are inefficient when pollen grains are tightly aggregated, and when fertilization rates of ovules are unknown. We thus established novel, Computed-Tomography-based counting techniques. In order to display the potential of our methods in very difficult cases, we counted pollen and ovules across inflorescences of deceptive and rewarding species of European orchids, which possess both very large numbers of pollen grains (tightly aggregated) and ovules. Pollen counts did not significantly vary across inflorescences and pollination strategies, whereas deceptive flowers had significantly more ovules than rewarding flowers. The within inflorescence variance of pollen to ovule ratios in rewarding flowers was four times higher than in deceptive flowers, possibly demonstrating differences in the constraints acting on both pollination strategies. We demonstrate the inaccuracies and limitations of previously established methods, and the broad applicability of our new techniques: they allow measurement of reproductive investment without restriction on object number or aggregation, and without specimen destruction.

scholarly journals Open Access University Press | A Research Project at the Leipzig University of Applied Sciences, Germany

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonia Schrader ◽  
Alexander Grossmann ◽  
Michael Reiche ◽  
David Bohm
Keyword(s):  
Applied Sciences ◽  
Open Access ◽  
Book Publishing ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Ministry Of Education ◽  
Research Project ◽  
Research Journal ◽  
University Of Applied Sciences ◽  
University Presses ◽  
First Results

The poster is an overview of the research project Open-Access-Hochschulverlag (in english Open Access University Press), that is funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, Germany) for 23 months (Start in May 2018). Open Access (OA) book publishing is still in relatively early stages, leading to academic books being much less frequently published OA than research journal articles. This has various effects on the publication landscape, which are described here. Despite established publishers meanwhile also offer the publication of OA monographs, only certain researchers can actually publish, because of high Book Processing Charges (BPCs) up to 10,000 USD and more. In contrast, university presses have started to publish monographs as OA without any or at significantly lower charges; however, university presses often do not have the technical know-how of the state-of-the-art publishing of OA books possessed by academic publishers. This is why, our research project aims to develop an sustainable and easy-to-adopt publication workflow for OA monographs, which is media-neutral as well as both cost-effective and personnel-efficient. Universities shall be enabled to publish their book publications as OA by adopting this workflow. In addition, first results and an outlook ahead to the further steps of the research project are depicted on the poster.

scholarly journals OpenMethods: A Compass for a More Open Digital Humanities

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gimena del Rio Riande ◽  
Erzsébet Tóth-Czifra ◽  
Ulrike Wuttke ◽  
Yoann Moranville
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Paradigm Shift ◽  
Digital Humanities ◽  
Scholarly Communication ◽  
Digital Transformation ◽  
Open Research ◽  
Communication Practices ◽  
Opening Up

The digital transformation has initiated a paradigm shift in research and scholarly communication practices towards a more open scholarly culture. Although this transformation is slowly happening in the Digital Humanities field, open is not yet default. The article introduces the OpenMethods metablog, a community platform that highlights open research methods, tools, and practices within the context of the Digital Humanities by republishing open access content around methods and tools in various formats and languages. It also describes the platform’s technical infrastructure based on its requirements and main functionalities, and especially the collaborative content sourcing and editorial workflows. The article concludes with a discussion of the potentials of the OpenMethods metablog to overcome barriers towards open practices by focusing on inclusive, community sourced information based around opening up research processes and the challenges that need to be overcome to achieve its goals.

scholarly journals D8.1 Data Management Plan

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Soriano ◽  
R. Rossi ◽  
Q. Ayoul-Guilmard
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Data Management ◽  
European Commission ◽  
Management Plan ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Scientific Publications ◽  
Horizon 2020 ◽  
Open Research ◽  
Data Program

The ExaQUte project participates in the Pilot on Open Research Data launched by the European Commission (EC) along with the H2020 program. This pilot is part of the Open Access to Scientific Publications and Research Data program in H2020. The goal of the program is to foster access to research data generated in H2020 projects. The use of a Data anagement Plan (DMP) is required for all projects participating in the Open Research Data Pilot, in which they will specify what data will be kept for the longer term. The underpinning idea is that Horizon 2020 beneficiaries have to make their research data findable, accessible, interoperable and re-usable (FAIR), to ensure it is soundly managed.

scholarly journals Towards a sustainable Open Access monograph publishing workflow for academic institutions

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonia Schrader ◽  
Alexander Grossmann ◽  
Michael Reiche
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Book Publishing ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Journal Articles ◽  
Research Project ◽  
University Presses ◽  
The University ◽  
Publication Workflow ◽  
Publishing Workflow

Across the world, there is a growing interest in Open Access (OA) publishing. Therefore, OA publishing has become a trend and is of key importance to the scientific community. However, observing the publication landscape in Germany leads to a striking finding of very different approaches. In particular, OA book publishing is still in relatively early stages, leading to OA books being much less frequently published than OA journal articles. However, although well-established publishers offer the publication of OA books, only certain researchers can actually publish, because of high Book Processing Charges (BPCs). In contrast to such publishers, university presses publish books as OA without any or at significantly lower charges; however, university presses are often inadequately staffed and do not have the technical know-how of the state-of-the-art publishing of OA books possessed by well-established publishers. For these reasons, our research project aims to develop an ideal and transferable publication workflow for OA books that is both cost-effective and personnel-efficient as well as media-neutral to enable universities to publish their publications as OA. To this end, a one-day meeting with stakeholders of the publication landscape was held in June 2018 at the University of Applied Science in Leipzig, Germany. During the meeting, the stakeholders were asked to present their views on the current situation and also the lessons learned and the shortcomings of the existing approaches. As a result, the observation was confirmed that the publication landscape is very heterogeneous and that there are no standardised interfaces and no harmonised practices for publishing OA books. Furthermore, in a discussion with the stakeholders during the second part of the meeting, further various issues of OA book publishing were revealed that have to be considered. Additionally, the various challenges and wishes of the stakeholders could be classified into five topic areas. These findings illustrate that the primary task of the research project has to be the analysis of the existing publishing workflows and abstracting generally valid processes that are needed to publish OA books. Additionally, the further issues of OA book publishing, mentioned by the stakeholders, have to be addressed during the development. The five topic areas will help reduce the complexity of this project.

scholarly journals JATS Blue Lite

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerrit Imsieke ◽  
Nina Linn Reinhardt
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Green Is ◽  
Large Numbers ◽  
In The Wild ◽  
Over Time

A JATS customization with a restricted vocabulary that is suitable for publishing metadata has been a desideratum in the JATS community. For some members, the JATS publishing customization (“Blue”) has acquired too many JATS archiving (“Green”) vocabulary items over time. Others want to have a straightforward editing schema without too many alternatives, similar to the authoring (“Pumpkin”) customization, but with support for publishing metadata. This work is an attempt to identify a commonly used subset of Blue (goal: 60% of its elements and attributes) that is able to support at least 90% of the JATS articles found in the wild, where “wild” means several hundred thousand articles sourced from publishers directly and from PubMed Central’s vast collections. In addition, this subset should also support the elements and attributes that have been added to JATS only recently and that are therefore unlikely to be found in large numbers within the articles analyzed. An attempt has been made to scrutinize vocabulary items that have been adopted from Green: Is the adoption merely a sign of the creeping “aquafication” of Blue that some suspect, or have these items really been missing in a more prescriptive and widely applicable journal tag set? Items that are considered important to modern publishing for several reasons – accessibility, open access, machine processability – have been included in this proposed subset. Also items that were underrepresented in the analyzed set of articles, but are considered fundamental to JATS, have been retained.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document