On the origin of equatorial Atlantic biases in coupled general circulation models

2008 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 587-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingo Richter ◽  
Shang-Ping Xie
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Equatorial Atlantic ◽  
Coupled General Circulation Models

Why is the AMOC Monostable in Coupled General Circulation Models?

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 2427-2443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Liu ◽  
Zhengyu Liu ◽  
Esther C. Brady
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Meridional Overturning Circulation ◽  
Surface Salinity ◽  
Sensitivity Experiment ◽  
Climate System Model ◽  
Control Simulation ◽  
Coupled General Circulation Models ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Flux Adjustment

Abstract This paper is concerned with the question: why do coupled general circulation models (CGCM) seem to be biased toward a monostable Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC)? In particular, the authors investigate whether the monostable behavior of the CGCMs is caused by a bias of model surface climatology. First observational literature is reviewed, and it is suggested that the AMOC is likely to be bistable in the real world in the past and present. Then the stability of the AMOC in the NCAR Community Climate System Model, version 3 (CCSM3) is studied by comparing the present-day control simulation (without flux adjustment) with a sensitivity experiment with flux adjustment. It is found that the monostable AMOC in the control simulation is altered to a bistable AMOC in the flux-adjustment experiment because a reduction of the surface salinity biases in the tropical and northern North Atlantic leads to a reduction of the bias of freshwater transport in the Atlantic. In particular, the tropical bias associated with the double ITCZ reduces salinity in the upper South Atlantic Ocean and, in turn, the AMOC freshwater export, which tends to overstabilize the AMOC and therefore biases the AMOC from bistable toward monostable state. This conclusion is consistent with a further analysis of the stability indicator of two groups of IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) CGCMs: one without and the other with flux adjustment. Because the tropical bias is a common feature among all CGCMs without flux adjustment, the authors propose that the surface climate bias, notably the tropical bias in the Atlantic, may contribute significantly to the monostability of AMOC behavior in current CGCMs.

scholarly journals A double ITCZ phenomenology of wind errors in the equatorial Atlantic in seasonal forecasts with ECMWF models

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (17) ◽  
pp. 11383-11399
Author(s):  
Jonathan K. P. Shonk ◽  
Teferi D. Demissie ◽  
Thomas Toniazzo
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
General Circulation ◽  
Marine Boundary Layer ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Equatorial Atlantic ◽  
Seasonal Forecasts ◽  
Coupled Models ◽  
Trade Winds ◽  
Double Itcz ◽  
Rapid Transition

Abstract. Modern coupled general circulation models produce systematic biases in the tropical Atlantic that hamper the reliability of long-range predictions. This study focuses on a common springtime westerly wind bias in the equatorial Atlantic in seasonal hindcasts from two coupled models – ECMWF System 4 and EC-Earth v2.3 – and in hindcasts also based on System 4, but with prescribed sea-surface temperatures. The development of the equatorial westerly bias in early April is marked by a rapid transition from a wintertime easterly, cold tongue bias to a springtime westerly bias regime that displays a marked double intertropical convergence zone (ITCZ). The transition is a seasonal feature of the model climatology (independent of initialisation date) and is associated with a seasonal increase in rainfall where a second branch of the ITCZ is produced south of the Equator. Excess off-equatorial convergence redirects the trade winds away from the Equator. Based on arguments of temporal coincidence, the results of our analysis contrast with those from previous work, and alleged causes hereto identified as the likely cause of the equatorial westerly bias in other models must be discarded. Quite in general, we find no evidence of remote influences on the development of the springtime equatorial bias in the Atlantic in the IFS-based models. Limited evidence however is presented that supports the hypothesis of an incorrect representation of the meridional equatorward flow in the marine boundary layer of the southern Atlantic as a contributing factor. Erroneous dynamical constraints on the flow upstream of the Equator may generate convergence and associated rainfall south of the Equator. This directs attention to the representation of the properties of the subtropical boundary layer as a potential source for the double ITCZ bias.

The Double-ITCZ Syndrome in Coupled General Circulation Models: The Role of Large-Scale Vertical Circulation Regimes

2010 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 1127-1145 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Bellucci ◽  
S. Gualdi ◽  
A. Navarra
Keyword(s):  
Surface Temperature ◽  
Systematic Error ◽  
General Circulation ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Deep Convection ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Intertropical Convergence Zone ◽  
Convergence Zone ◽  
Vertical Circulation ◽  
Coupled General Circulation Models

Abstract The double–intertropical convergence zone (DI) systematic error, affecting state-of-the-art coupled general circulation models (CGCMs), is examined in the multimodel Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) ensemble of simulations of the twentieth-century climate. The aim of this study is to quantify the DI error on precipitation in the tropical Pacific, with a specific focus on the relationship between the DI error and the representation of large-scale vertical circulation regimes in climate models. The DI rainfall signal is analyzed using a regime-sorting approach for the vertical circulation regimes. Through the use of this compositing technique, precipitation events are regime sorted based on the large-scale vertical motions, as represented by the midtropospheric Lagrangian pressure tendency ω500 dynamical proxy. This methodology allows partition of the precipitation signal into deep and shallow convective components. Following the regime-sorting diagnosis, the total DI bias is split into an error affecting the magnitude of precipitation associated with individual convective events and an error affecting the frequency of occurrence of single convective regimes. It is shown that, despite the existing large intramodel differences, CGCMs can be ultimately grouped into a few homogenous clusters, each featuring a well-defined rainfall–vertical circulation relationship in the DI region. Three major behavioral clusters are identified within the AR4 models ensemble: two unimodal distributions, featuring maximum precipitation under subsidence and deep convection regimes, respectively, and one bimodal distribution, displaying both components. Extending this analysis to both coupled and uncoupled (atmosphere only) AR4 simulations reveals that the DI bias in CGCMs is mainly due to the overly frequent occurrence of deep convection regimes, whereas the error on rainfall magnitude associated with individual convective events is overall consistent with errors already present in the corresponding atmosphere stand-alone simulations. A critical parameter controlling the strength of the DI systematic error is identified in the model-dependent sea surface temperature (SST) threshold leading to the onset of deep convection (THR), combined with the average SST in the southeastern Pacific. The models featuring a THR that is systematically colder (warmer) than their mean surface temperature are more (less) prone to exhibit a spurious southern intertropical convergence zone.

scholarly journals Ocean mixed layer processes in the Pacific Decadal Oscillation in coupled general circulation models

2012 ◽  
Vol 41 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 1407-1417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Young Yim ◽  
Yign Noh ◽  
Sang-Wook Yeh ◽  
Jong-Seong Kug ◽  
Hong Sik Min ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Layer ◽  
Pacific Decadal Oscillation ◽  
General Circulation ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Ocean Mixed Layer ◽  
The Pacific ◽  
Coupled General Circulation Models

Investigating quasi-resonant Rossby waves with an idealized general circulation model

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Todd Mooring ◽  
Marianna Linz
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation Model ◽  
General Circulation ◽  
Rossby Waves ◽  
Circulation Model ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Weather Extremes ◽  
Dynamical Mechanism ◽  
Atmospheric Physics ◽  
Coupled General Circulation Models ◽  
Mean State

<p>Petoukhov et al.’s (2013, PNAS) hypothesis of quasi-resonant Rossby waves as a mechanism for destructive weather extremes—both heat- and rain-related, observed and projected—has received a great deal of attention in recent years.  Most notably, it has been used for diagnostic studies of reanalysis products and full-physics atmospheric or coupled general circulation models. However, studies of this sort essentially assume (rather than test) the validity of the underlying theory.</p><p>Since the quasi-resonance theoretical arguments do not explicitly involve the full complexity of atmospheric physics, it ought to be possible to test them within the much simpler framework of an idealized general circulation model. By carefully constructing the forcing fields for such a model, we will achieve control of its zonal mean state and thus the waveguide properties of the zonal jet. We will explore the properties of the quasi-stationary Rossby waves in such simulations to test whether they have the properties predicted by Petoukhov et al. By testing this dynamical mechanism in a simplified model, we can better understand its applicability and limitations for investigations of future climate.</p>

Evaluating the performance of CMIP6 models in the tropical Atlantic: mean state, variability, and remote impacts

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingo Richter ◽  
Hiroki Tokinaga
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Tropical Pacific ◽  
Boreal Summer ◽  
Tropical Atlantic ◽  
Westerly Wind ◽  
Equatorial Atlantic ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Mean State ◽  
The Tropical Pacific

<p>General circulation models of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) are examined with respect to their ability to simulate the mean state and variability of the tropical Atlantic, as well as its linkage to the tropical Pacific. While, on average, mean state biases have improved little relative to the previous intercomparison (CMIP5), there are now a few models with very small biases. In particular the equatorial Atlantic warm SST and westerly wind biases are mostly eliminated in these models. Furthermore, interannual variability in the equatorial and subtropical Atlantic is quite realistic in a number of CMIP6 models, which suggests that they should be useful tools for understanding and predicting variability patterns. The evolution of equatorial Atlantic biases follows the same pattern as in previous model generations, with westerly wind biases during boreal spring preceding warm sea-surface temperature (SST) biases in the east during boreal summer. A substantial portion of the westerly wind bias exists already in atmosphere-only simulations forced with observed SST, suggesting an atmospheric origin. While variability is relatively realistic in many models, SSTs seem less responsive to wind forcing than observed, both on the equator and in the subtropics, possibly due to an excessively deep mixed layer originating in the oceanic component. Thus models with realistic SST amplitude tend to have excessive wind amplitude. The models with the smallest mean state biases all have relatively high resolution but there are also a few low-resolution models that perform similarly well, indicating that resolution is not the only way toward reducing tropical Atlantic biases. The results also show a relatively weak link between mean state biases and the quality of the simulated variability. The linkage to the tropical Pacific shows a wide range of behaviors across models, indicating the need for further model improvement.</p>

scholarly journals Multidecadal to Centennial Variability of the AMOC: HadCM3 and a Perturbed Physics Ensemble

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 2390-2407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Jackson ◽  
Michael Vellinga
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Meridional Overturning Circulation ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Equatorial Atlantic ◽  
Small Ensemble ◽  
Background Climate ◽  
Perturbed Physics

Abstract Multidecadal to centennial variability of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) is investigated in a multi-thousand-year simulation of the third version of the Hadley Centre Coupled Model (HadCM3) and in an ensemble of general circulation models (GCMs) based on HadCM3 with perturbed physics. Large changes in the AMOC in the standard HadCM3 are strongly related to salinity anomalies in the deep-water formation regions, with anomalies arriving via two pathways. The first is from a coupled feedback in the equatorial Atlantic Ocean, described previously by Vellinga and Wu, and the second is from variability in the Arctic Ocean, possibly driven by stochastic sea level pressure. The low-frequency variability of the AMOC in HadCM3 is well predicted from salinity anomalies from these two pathways. The sensitivity of these processes to model physics is investigated using a small ensemble based on HadCM3 where parameters relating to physical processes are varied. The AMOC responds consistently to the salinity anomalies in the ensemble members. However, 1) the timing of the response depends on the background climate state and 2) some ensemble members have significantly larger AMOC and salinity variability than in standard HadCM3 simulations. In this small ensemble, the presence and strength of multidecadal to centennial AMOC variability is associated with the variability of salinity exported from the Arctic, with little multidecadal to centennial variability of either in the coldest members. This demonstrates how the background climate state can alter the frequency and strength of AMOC variability and is a first step toward understanding how AMOC variability differs within a multimodel context.

Global Coupled General Circulation Models

1995 ◽  
Vol 76 (6) ◽  
pp. 951-957 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald A. Meehl
Keyword(s):  
General Circulation ◽  
Research Programme ◽  
General Circulation Models ◽  
Coupled Modeling ◽  
Coupled Modelling ◽  
Climate Research ◽  
The World ◽  
The Status ◽  
Coupled General Circulation Models ◽  
La Jolla

Major conclusions and recommendations regarding the status of global coupled general circulation models are presented here from a workshop convened by the World Climate Research Programme Steering Group on Global Coupled Modelling that was held from 10 to 12 October 1994 at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, California. The purpose of the workshop was to assess the current state of the art of global coupled modeling on the decadal and longer timescales in terms of methodology and results to identify the major issues and problems facing this activity and to discuss possible alternatives for making progress in light of these problems. This workshop brought together representatives from nearly every group in the world actively involved in formulating and running such models. After presentations by workshop participants, four working groups identified key issues involving 1) initialization and model spinup, 2) strategies and techniques for coupling of model components, 3) flux correction/adjustment, and 4) secular drift and systematic errors. The participants concluded that improved communication between those engaged in this activity will be important to enhance further progress. Consequently, the World Climate Research Programme intends to continue the support of internationally coordinated activities in global coupled modeling.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document