COPD: Health Care Utilisation Patterns with Different Disease Management Interventions

Lung ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 195 (4) ◽  
pp. 455-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edwin K. Luk ◽  
Anastasia F. Hutchinson ◽  
Mark Tacey ◽  
Louis Irving ◽  
Fary Khan
2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A. Scuffham ◽  
Joshua M. Byrnes ◽  
Christine Pollicino ◽  
David Cross ◽  
Stan Goldstein ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 118 (4) ◽  
pp. A678
Author(s):  
Paul Moayyedi ◽  
Richard Feltbower ◽  
Sara Duffett ◽  
Will Crocombe ◽  
David Forman ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 453-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gisela Hostenkamp ◽  
Jan Sørensen

AbstractObjectiveRegular dietary intake of fish is associated with reduced risk of developing cardiovascular and other chronic diseases, and may improve general well-being. If fish eaters are healthier, they may use fewer health-care resources. The present study aimed to describe the reported intake of fish and fish products in a Danish general population, and to investigate whether fish consumption is associated with generic measures of self-reported health and consumption of health-care resources.DesignData on eating patterns and health status for 3422 Danish adults were obtained by telephone interview in the Funen County Health Survey. These data were merged with individual-level register data on health-care utilisation. Survey respondents were categorised into those consuming fish at least once weekly (fish eaters) and those consuming fish less frequently (non-fish eaters).ResultsPeople who reported eating fish twice monthly or once weekly had significantly better overall self-reported health than those who rarely eat fish, even after adjustment for age, gender, social characteristics and lifestyle factors. Fish eaters did not have significantly lower aggregated health-care costs, although their hospital utilisation was significantly lower than that for non-fish eaters.ConclusionsModerate fish consumption was associated with better self-reported general health even after controlling for possible confounding variables. Overall, fish eaters appeared to use the same amount of health-care resources as non-eaters, although fish eaters used more medicine but were less likely to be admitted to a hospital.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document