Response to ?Cervical artery dissection?clinical features, risk factors, therapy and outcome in 126 patients [1]?

2005 ◽  
Vol 252 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Wenban
2003 ◽  
Vol 250 (10) ◽  
pp. 1179-1184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rainer Dziewas ◽  
Carsten Konrad ◽  
Bianca Dr�ger ◽  
Stefan Evers ◽  
Michael Besselmann ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 110-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bettina von Sarnowski ◽  
Ulf Schminke ◽  
Ulrike Grittner ◽  
Franz Fazekas ◽  
Christian Tanislav ◽  
...  

Background: Patients with carotid artery dissection (CAD) have been reported to have different vascular risk factor profiles and clinical outcomes to those with vertebral artery dissection (VAD). However, there are limited data from recent, large international studies comparing risk factors and clinical features in patients with cervical artery dissection (CeAD) with other TIA or ischemic stroke (IS) patients of similar age and sex. Methods: We analysed demographic, clinical and risk factor profiles in TIA and IS patients ≤55 years of age with and without CeAD in the large European, multi-centre, Stroke In young FAbry Patients 1 (sifap1) study. Patients were further categorised according to age (younger: 18-44 years; middle-aged: 45-55 years), sex, and site of dissection. Results: Data on the presence of dissection were available in 4,208 TIA and IS patients of whom 439 (10.4%) had CeAD: 196 (50.1%) had CAD, 195 (49.9%) had VAD, and 48 had multiple artery dissections or no information regarding the dissected artery. The prevalence of CAD was higher in women than in men (5.9 vs. 3.8%, p < 0.01), whereas the prevalence of VAD was similar in women and men (4.6 vs. 4.7%, n.s.). Patients with VAD were younger than patients with CAD (median = 41 years (IQR = 35-47 years) versus median = 45 years (IQR = 39-49 years); p < 0.01). At stroke onset, about twice as many patients with either CAD (54.0 vs. 23.1%, p < 0.001) or VAD (63.4 vs. 36.6%, p < 0.001) had headache than patients without CeAD and stroke in the anterior or posterior circulation, respectively. Compared to patients without CeAD, hypertension, concomitant cardiovascular diseases and a patent foramen ovale were significantly less prevalent in both CAD and VAD patients, whereas tobacco smoking, physical inactivity, obesity and a family history of cerebrovascular diseases were found less frequently in CAD patients, but not in VAD patients. A history of migraine was observed at a similar frequency in patients with CAD (31%), VAD (27.8%) and in those without CeAD (25.8%). Conclusions: We identified clinical features and risk factor profiles that are specific to young patients with CeAD, and to subgroups with either CAD or VAD compared to patients without CeAD. Therefore, our data support the concept that certain vascular risk factors differentially affect the risk of CAD and VAD.


2019 ◽  
Vol 160 (22) ◽  
pp. 861-868
Author(s):  
Csilla Forró ◽  
Zsófia Mészáros ◽  
Márton Sipos ◽  
Rita Zsuzsanna Kerényi ◽  
Péter Barsi ◽  
...  

Abstract: Cervical artery dissection is a common cause of stroke in young adults. It might occur shortly after a forceful neck trauma or a minor injury. However, spontaneous dissection is also common, which is associated with genetic, anatomical or environmental risk factors. Cervical artery dissection can produce a broad spectrum of clinical presentation varying from local symptoms to focal neurological deficits determined by the arterial territory involved. Early recognition is important since immediate initiation of treatment can significantly improve patient outcomes. While clinical features may raise suspicion for dissection, the diagnosis has to be confirmed by neuroimaging findings. The purpose of this paper is to give an overview on cervical (carotid and vertebral) artery dissections while presenting 19 cases. During three years, we evaluated the clinical features, risk factors, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures of these patients admitted with extracranial artery dissection. The prognosis of the disease can vary, 42% of our patients became asymptomatic. Orv Hetil. 2019; 160(22): 861–868.


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Arnaud ◽  
Marion Boulanger ◽  
Aurélien Lorthioir ◽  
Laurence Amar ◽  
Arshid Azarine ◽  
...  

Background: Cervical artery dissection (CeAD) is one of the most frequent manifestations of fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD). However, the risk factors for CeAD are unknown. We investigated factors associated with CeAD in the ARCADIA (Assessment of Renal and Cervical Artery Dysplasia) registry and performed a pooled analysis of published and unpublished data. Methods: Patients included were women and men ≥18 years, diagnosed with renal, cervical, or intracranial artery FMD, prospectively recruited at 16 university hospitals in France and Belgium. Diagnosis of CeAD was established by stroke specialists in each participating center, according to standard diagnostic criteria. Associations between CeAD and potential determinants were assessed by calculations of crude and adjusted odds ratios. Results: Among 469 patients (415 women) with FMD, 68 (14.5%) had CeAD. CeAD patients were younger, more likely to be men and to have a history of migraine, and less likely to have a history of hypertension, than non-CeAD patients. In the multivariate analysis, male sex (OR=2.75 ; CI95% 1.39-5.46), history of migraine (OR=1.93 ; 1.08-3.44), age >50 years (OR=0.41 ; 0.23-0.74), history of hypertension (OR=0.35 ; 0.19-0.63), and the number of vascular beds involved by FMD >=3 (OR=2.46 ; 1.13-5.35) remained significantly associated with CeAD. We collected data from 2 published studies and unpublished data from the US and the European Registries. There was no overlap between studies. In a pooled analysis (289 CeAD in 1933 patients), male sex was significantly associated with CeAD (pooled OR=2.04 ; 1.41-2.95, I2=0%, Figure). Conclusion: In patients with FMD, male sex and multisite involvement are associated with of CeAD, in addition to other previous known risk factors.


Neurology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 88 (14) ◽  
pp. 1313-1320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Traenka ◽  
Daphne Dougoud ◽  
Barbara Goeggel Simonetti ◽  
Tiina M. Metso ◽  
Stéphanie Debette ◽  
...  

Objective:In a cohort of patients diagnosed with cervical artery dissection (CeAD), to determine the proportion of patients aged ≥60 years and compare the frequency of characteristics (presenting symptoms, risk factors, and outcome) in patients aged <60 vs ≥60 years.Methods:We combined data from 3 large cohorts of consecutive patients diagnosed with CeAD (i.e., Cervical Artery Dissection and Ischemic Stroke Patients–Plus consortium). We dichotomized cases into 2 groups, age ≥60 and <60 years, and compared clinical characteristics, risk factors, vascular features, and 3-month outcome between the groups. First, we performed a combined analysis of pooled individual patient data. Secondary analyses were done within each cohort and across cohorts. Crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR [95% confidence interval]) were calculated.Results:Among 2,391 patients diagnosed with CeAD, we identified 177 patients (7.4%) aged ≥60 years. In this age group, cervical pain (ORadjusted 0.47 [0.33–0.66]), headache (ORadjusted 0.58 [0.42–0.79]), mechanical trigger events (ORadjusted 0.53 [0.36–0.77]), and migraine (ORadjusted 0.58 [0.39–0.85]) were less frequent than in younger patients. In turn, hypercholesterolemia (ORadjusted 1.52 [1.1–2.10]) and hypertension (ORadjusted 3.08 [2.25–4.22]) were more frequent in older patients. Key differences between age groups were confirmed in secondary analyses. In multivariable, adjusted analyses, favorable outcome (i.e., modified Rankin Scale score 0–2) was less frequent in the older age group (ORadjusted 0.45 [0.25, 0.83]).Conclusion:In our study population of patients diagnosed with CeAD, 1 in 14 was aged ≥60 years. In these patients, pain and mechanical triggers might be missing, rendering the diagnosis more challenging and increasing the risk of missed CeAD diagnosis in older patients.


Author(s):  
Lucija Jazbec ◽  
Marija Menih ◽  
Rok Arh

Abstract Background Ischemic stroke is one of the most common causes of death and disability. The most common independent cause is cervical artery dissection, which represents around 20% of all cases of ischemic stroke in young adults. Risk factors for dissection include male gender, migraine (particularly with aura), hyperhomocysteinemia, recent infection, recent history of minor cervical trauma, young age, current smoking status, increased leucocyte count, and shortened activated partial thromboplastin time, whereas hypercholesterolemia and being overweight appear protective. Patients and Methods This retrospective study was based on data of all patients aged 18 to 49 who were hospitalized in the University Medical Centre Maribor for ischemic stroke between 2010 and 2019 inclusive. The results of the research were analyzed by IBM SPSS Statistics 28 software. For statistical significance, a cut-off value of p < 0.05 was used. Results The study includes 196 patients with 198 events of ischemic stroke. Dissection of cervical arteries was presented in 16 (8.2%) cases. The presence of arterial hypertension proved to have a relation with the presence of a dissection; patients with dissection are less likely to suffer from arterial hypertension. Duration of hospitalization in the group with dissection lasted significantly longer than in the group without dissection. Conclusions Dissection of cervical or intracranial artery is an important cause of ischemic stroke, especially in young adults. Therefore, it should be considered in young adults with presentation of stroke who lack traditional and modifiable risk factors.


Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens Witsch ◽  
Saad Mir ◽  
Neal S Parikh ◽  
Santosh Murthy ◽  
Hooman Kamel ◽  
...  

Background: Cervical artery dissection (CAD) often affects young, otherwise healthy people. Few data exist on whether patients with CAD face an increased vulnerability to aortic dissection. Herein we tested the hypothesis that CAD is associated with an increased risk of aortic dissection. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using statewide administrative claims data from all Emergency Department visits and admissions at nonfederal hospitals in Florida from 2005 to 2015 and New York from 2006 to 2015. We used previously validated International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes (ICD-9-CM) to identify patients with CAD and aortic dissection. Patients with prevalent aortic dissection were excluded. Our exposure variable was CAD and the outcome was incident aortic dissection after discharge from CAD hospitalization. Survival statistics were used to calculate incidence rates and Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to determine the association between CAD and aortic dissection while adjusting for demographics and vascular risk factors. In a secondary analysis, we excluded patients who had a traumatic CAD, defined as having concomitant ICD-9-CM codes for head or neck trauma at the time of CAD. Results: Among 19,715,114 patients, 4,537 (0.02%) had a CAD. The mean age of patients with CAD was 52.3±16.4 years. During 4.2±3.1 years of follow up, 16,571 patients were diagnosed with an aortic dissection (0.08%). The incidence of aortic dissection was 2.5 (95% CI, 1.7-3.7) per 1,000 patients per year in those with CAD versus 0.2 (95% CI, 0.2-0.2) per 1,000 patients per year in those without CAD. After adjustment for demographics and vascular risk factors, we found that CAD was associated with subsequent aortic dissection (HR 3.0, 95% CI, 2.1-4.5). Our results were similar in a secondary analysis excluding patients with traumatic CAD (HR 3.3, 95% CI, 2.2-4.8). Conclusions: In a large population-based cohort, we found that CAD was associated with a 3-fold increased risk of aortic dissection. Future studies should evaluate the utility of performing screening aortic imaging in patients with CAD.


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aayushi Garg ◽  
Vaelan Molian ◽  
Kaustubh Limaye ◽  
David Hasan ◽  
Enrique C Leira ◽  
...  

Introduction: Cervical artery dissection (CeAD) is a major cause of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in young adults. Its pathophysiology is distinct from the other etiologies of AIS and is determined by both genetic and environmental factors. In this study, we sought to determine the risk factors for and outcomes of AIS due to CeAD in young adults, in the era of increasing utilization of neuroimaging and neuro-intervention procedures. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all cases of AIS between 15-45 years of age admitted to our comprehensive stroke center between January 2010 - November 2016. Risk factors and outcomes were compared between patients with and without CeAD using univariate analysis. Multivariable generalized linear and logistic regression models were used to adjust for confounding variables. Results: Of the total 333 patients with AIS included in the study (mean±SD age: 36.4±7.1 years; females 50.8%), CeAD was identified in 84 (25.2%) patients. When compared to the non-CeAD group, patients with CeAD were younger in age and more likely to have a history of migraine and recent chiropractic neck manipulation (p<0.05). Risk factors including hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia and obesity were more prevalent in the non-CeAD group (p<0.05). Patients with CeAD had shorter hospital stay by an average of 1.8 days (95% CI=0.3-3.4, p<0.05), however, this difference was not statistically significant after adjustment for initial NIHSS score, age, gender, and comorbidities. Patients with CeAD were more likely to have worse functional outcome at discharge, defined as modified Rankin scale score (mRS) ≥3, independent of the above confounding variables (adjusted odds ratio 3.6, 95% CI=1.6-8.1). The in-hospital mortality rate, discharge disposition, mRS score and recurrence rates at follow-up (mean time 4.2 months) were similar between the two groups. Conclusions: While history of migraine and recent chiropractic neck manipulation are significantly associated with CeAD; most of the traditional vascular risk factors are less prevalent in this group. In comparison with AIS due to other etiologies, patients with CeAD have worse functional outcomes at the time of discharge but similar outcomes at follow up, which suggests a propensity for better recovery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document